Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Trump democracy ‘is work in progress’

Trump democracy  ‘is work in progress’
Donald Trump.
Getty Images

DONALD TRUMP, the Republican candidate running against Democrat president Joe Biden in the US presidential election due on November 5, has warned: “Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s gonna be a bloodbath. That’s going to be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country.” 

 Nevertheless, some papers in the UK are rooting for a Trump victory.  


Meanwhile, the Indian general election will be held in seven phases between April 19 and June 1, with the result declared on June 4. Some 968 million people – 150 million more than the last elections in 2019 – are eligible to vote. Turnout in 2019 was 67 per cent.  

Will prime minister Narendra Modi win? Probably, but Indian elections are unpredictable because of the differences between north and south and the distinctive political factors in each state. West Bengal, for example, ruled by Mamata Banerjee’s Trinamul Congress, is very different from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Rajasthan or Tamil Nadu.  

In the United States, in marked contrast, there were 161.42 million people registered to vote in 2022. This is a fall from the previous election, when 168.31 million people were on electoral rolls. 

 The US president is not chosen by a popular mandate, but indirectly through an electoral college, which makes that country’s system of democracy – especially the brand favoured by Trump when he has to win – work in progress. 

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

An anti-migrant protest in Glasgow’s Possilpark on July 11, 2026, amid rising tensions and violence over migration across parts of UK

Getty Images

When protest becomes a pogrom: The Home Office must draw a clearer line

Sunder Katwala

IT TOOK three nights of violence in Thetford, Norfolk for the police to restore order. A crowd chanted “get them out” and “deport, deport, deport” as they pelted a house with eggs and smashed the windows. Several dozen people tried to break down the door, hoping to confront the people inside, violently attacking the police who blocked them.

This violent criminality was not political protest, but an attempt at a xenophobic pogrom to drive out asylum seekers housed in the property. The police relocated them elsewhere for their own safety. That felt like ‘mission accomplished’ for the angry crowd. Online, extremists suggested other places could target asylum seekers’ homes to emulate Thetford’s success. Disorder in Belfast and Epping had seen a crime, committed by an asylum seeker, used to mobilise collective punishment against migrants and other ethnic minorities. Nobody involved in the Thetford disorder suggested those in the house targeted had caused any trouble. The mere presence of asylum seekers in the town was perceived as a threat – from “illegals” or “invaders”.

Keep Reading Show less