Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Advantage Truss unless Sunak springs surprise’

If foreign secretary wins, will she include ex-chancellor in her top team?

‘Advantage Truss unless Sunak springs surprise’

LIZ TRUSS has all the momentum in the race to be the next British prime minister.

In theory, Rishi Sunak has five weeks and 10 more candidate debates before voting closes. In practice, this fortnight is crucial. Ballot papers drop through letterboxes from this week. Half of members may send them straight back.


The system allows for second thoughts – a later online vote can overturn a postal ballot – but that may be rare. So the candidates are seeking to meet as many members as possible early in the campaign.

The main evidence that it is advantage Truss comes from a few polls of Conservative members. Accurate membership polling has methodological challenges, though the 2019 surveys were close to the result, with a mild skew to Boris Johnson over Jeremy Hunt. Those polls shift the campaign narrative by influencing what MPs and the media do and say. The defence secretary Ben Wallace and former candidate Tom Tugendhat have both endorsed Truss.

GettyImages 1241895255 (L-R) Penny Mordaunt, Liz Truss, Kemi Badenoch, Rishi Sunak, Tom Tugendhat (Photo by Getty Images)

Major figures who lean more towards Sunak have stayed neutral. The sense of being behind has seen the Sunak campaign wobble over their campaign choices on tax. Sunak could have been bolder in defending his resignation from Johnson’s government – arguing that stabbing him not in the back, but in the front, was leadership. The third of members who wanted Johnson to stay have been more vocal than the majority who thought Johnson’s time was up.

In hindsight, Sunak’s strategic error may have been not acting sooner. He was much more popular than the government – or Truss – six months ago. They now run neck and neck among the wider public, dampening his key claim: greater electability.

Unless Sunak springs a summer surprise, Truss looks the most likely prime minister in September. Her first task – to choose her top team – is more difficult after the Johnson meltdown saw 69 ministers, including six of the cabinet, resign in July. There will be more reshuffle disappointments than usual, given the hopes of ministers old and new, and rising stars too.

GettyImages 1241852258 Simon Clarke (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

Truss will want a close ally as chancellor, willing to challenge Treasury caution. Simon Clarke, currently chief secretary, might win promotion to chancellor, or form a Treasury team under Kwasi Kwarteng, one of whose many books as an author is on the economic battles of 1981 that shaped the Thatcher government.

Would Truss find a role for Sunak? Their policy and personal clashes may suggest not. Yet both have said – on camera – that they would want their rival in their team. If Truss needs to honour the pledge, foreign secretary may be the only role that might be both offered and accepted.

The India media’s fascination with this leadership campaign has booted Sunak’s profile there. There will be disappointment in Delhi if Sunak does not win the contest, but appointing the first British Asian foreign secretary could give Truss an ambassador for Global Britain able to emulate her own energy in the role.

Kemi Badenoch is tipped for culture or education secretary. Tugendhat may join the cabinet too. Penny Mordaunt’s bitter battle with Truss may provide another high-profile headache about who to have in the team. Michael Gove could be asked to return to show that Levelling Up remains the mission of the government – or be asked to bring his reforming instincts to getting a grip on the Home Office.

Sunder sml 1  c center Sunder Katwala

The leadership candidates have campaigned as if they were in opposition, not government. That reflects the national mood. By 57 per cent to 16, people think the country is on the wrong track. Pessimism about the economy is where it was during the 2008 crisis.

The public will give any new prime minister a chance. Even a brief honeymoon would generate intense speculation about a general election this year. Johnson and Theresa May each called early elections – after six and 12 months respectively – while Gordon Brown damaged his short premiership. Truss is clear she has no intention of holding a snap election. That would give her two years as prime minister to deliver. Truss is often compared to Johnson, because both are optimistic, blond and politically flexible. Yet Truss has a much more serious interest in policy than Johnson ever did – the difference between being a think-tanker, not a journalist, before entering parliament.

Her instincts are to be bold, though Truss’s personal, smaller-state instincts are sometimes in tension with Conservative electoral strategy. The public are more sceptical of tax cuts if they mean less spending too. Truss’s ability to pursue her long-term interests in a reformed and slimmer state would depend on how she could navigate the immediate crises – on energy bills, inflation and the NHS.

Whoever wins the contest, they face perhaps the most daunting inheritance that any modern peacetime prime minister has had.

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less