Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Alok Sharma criticises government's oil and gas bill

The bill, which garnered 293 votes for and 211 against, saw no opposition from Tory MPs, with Sharma choosing to abstain

Alok Sharma criticises government's oil and gas bill

Alok Sharma, former business secretary and president of the Cop26 climate talks, has voiced his concerns that the government's new oil and gas bill, which recently passed its second reading in the Commons on Monday (22), neither reduces household energy costs nor generates employment.

Instead, he argues, it contradicts the UK's commitment to phasing out fossil fuels, The Guardian reported.


The bill, which garnered 293 votes for and 211 against, saw no opposition from Tory MPs, with Sharma choosing to abstain. It mandates the North Sea Transition Authority to conduct annual calls for new offshore oil and gas license applications.

This move comes despite warnings from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, consisting of hundreds of experts, who have clearly stated that awarding new oil and gas licenses is incompatible with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels.

Exceeding this threshold could lead to a climate disaster, adversely affecting the lives of millions.

Furthermore, this legislation seems to be at odds with the promises made by UK ministers at the previous year’s Cop28 conference in Dubai, where they committed to phasing out oil and gas production.

Addressing the inconsistency between the UK's climate commitments and current legislative actions, Sharma highlighted the contradiction in minister Graham Stuart's position at the Cop28 conference.

Sharma recalled Stuart's tweet from the conference, emphasising the need for an unabated phase-out of fossil fuels to achieve climate goals.

However, Sharma pointed out, the bill under consideration solely aims to increase oil and gas production licenses, a move he believes does not align with the commitment to transition away from fossil fuels.

Sharma expressed his skepticism about the bill's ability to reduce energy bills or create jobs, countering the assertions made by Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho.

He emphasised that the bill is intended to enhance domestic energy security, but raised concerns over the practical impact.

Sharma explained that the North Sea's oil and gas, owned by private companies, are not under government control regarding their sale, implying that this may not lead to lower energy bills.

He also highlighted the loss of 200,000 jobs in the oil and gas sector over the past decade, despite the issuance of hundreds of new drilling licenses, questioning the bill's potential for job creation.

Sharma further argued that the expertise and skills prevalent in the oil and gas sector could be effectively redirected towards renewable energy sources. He advocated for the government to shift its focus towards the development of more wind and solar power, as well as nuclear energy.

Ed Miliband highlighted that Sharma's criticism of the bill was echoed by several prominent Tories, including former net zero tsar Chris Skidmore, who resigned as an MP in protest of the government's plans, and former prime minister Theresa May.

The shadow energy secretary condemned the bill as "climate vandalism," addressing the Commons with a critique of its inadequacy.

“We face massive challenges as a country but it isn’t the scale of our problems that is apparent today, it’s the smallness of their response.” He said the bill was “risible” and ineffective in enhancing Britain's energy security.

However, Coutinho defended the bill, arguing that it would bolster energy security in both the UK and Europe. She acknowledged the practical constraints, stating, "We do not live in a world where we can simply turn off oil and gas." Coutinho highlighted the North Sea's resources, describing the UK as "blessed" for its access to these fossil fuels.

Some Tory MPs voiced reservations about the bill. Vicky Ford, representing Chelmsford, expressed concerns about the bill's global perception, suggesting, that by approving these licenses, the UK risks being seen as backing away from promises made on climate change.

Ford, alongside Jerome Mayhew, another member of the Conservative Environment Network, indicated their intent to support the bill initially, but planned to later endorse amendments aimed at compelling the UK's oil and gas sector to adopt more carbon-efficient practices.

May, known for signing net zero targets into law, was also speculated to oppose the bill. However, her absence from the Commons led to her abstaining from the vote.

Skidmore strongly opposed the bill, urging his former colleagues to reject it.

He said, “As I stated in my resignation letter, the future will judge harshly any MP that votes for new additional fossil fuels. Today’s legislation makes no economic sense, will deliver no additional energy security, and breaks the UK’s international commitments on climate action.”

Ami McCarthy, a political campaigner for Greenpeace UK, also criticised the government's decision, stating, though the government has secured a victory in this vote, it's a loss for the planet and all its inhabitants.

She said, “Literally no one benefits from this nonsensical, climate-wrecking bill except the oil and gas industry and its shareholders.”

Adding to the critique, Alasdair Johnstone from the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit remarked that the North Sea's oil and gas reserves are dwindling, and this bill merely distracts from genuine solutions for the UK's energy independence.

Johnstone said that the key to achieving UK's energy independence is to lessen the country's reliance on gas.

He suggested that the focus should be on developing renewable energy sources and enhancing insulation in homes, particularly those that are cold and damp.

He noted, however, that the government's performance in these critical areas has been a matter of some concern.

More For You

uk-railways-iStock

The package includes £415 million to upgrade the rail line between Manchester, Huddersfield, Leeds, and York, a route affected by delays and disruptions. (Representational image: iStock)

iStock

Government announces £1.7 bn transport investment for the North

THE GOVERNMENT has announced a £1.7 billion investment to improve transport infrastructure across the North, focusing on buses, roads, and rail.

The funding aims to upgrade key routes and improve connectivity across the region.

Keep ReadingShow less
Keir-Starmer-Getty

Keir Starmer’s communications chief has resigned after nine months in Downing Street. (Photo: Getty Images)

Getty Images

Starmer’s communications chief Matthew Doyle resigns after nine months

KEIR STARMER’s communications chief, Matthew Doyle, has resigned after nine months in Downing Street. Doyle, a Labour veteran who previously worked for Tony Blair, joined Starmer’s team as communications director four years ago when the party was in opposition.

His departure follows that of Sue Gray, Starmer’s former chief of staff, who left in the autumn. Doyle’s exit is expected to lead to the promotions of James Lyons to director of communications (strategy) and Steph Driver to director of communications (delivery), according to the BBC.

Keep ReadingShow less
Leicester leaders push for major expansion amid local government shake-up

Leicester’s population is expected to grow from 372,000 now to just over 600,000 by 2028

Leicester leaders push for major expansion amid local government shake-up

Hannah Richardson

LEICESTER leaders have named the areas they want to be incorporated into the city amid a shake-up of local government structures. The massive expansion plan would see a number of towns and villages at the city’s edges brought inside Leicester’s boundary.

Leicester City Council is looking to take part of Blaby and Harborough districts, and part of Oadby and Wigston and Charnwood boroughs. Among the communities being eyed up are Glenfield, Oadby, Wigston, Blaby, Whetstone, Syston, Anstey, Leicester Forest East, Birstall, Kirby Muxloe, Thurmaston and Countesthorpe.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lakshmi-Mittal-Getty

Mittal, who built his steel business over five decades, moved to the UK in 1995. (Photo: Getty Images)

Getty Images

Lakshmi Mittal may leave UK after non-dom tax abolition: report

STEEL tycoon Lakshmi Mittal is considering leaving the UK following the government’s decision to abolish the non-domiciled tax status. The move would make him one of the most prominent entrepreneurs to leave due to the tax reform.

Mittal, who has lived in the UK for three decades, has informed associates that his departure is likely due to Labour’s decision to end the non-dom regime, which allowed certain residents to avoid paying UK tax on foreign income.

Keep ReadingShow less
King Charles

The palace said in a statement that after receiving scheduled treatment in the morning, the king had 'temporary side effects that required a short period of observation in hospital.' (Photo: Getty Images)

Getty Images

King Charles cancels engagements after cancer treatment side effects

KING CHARLES has postponed his engagements for Thursday and Friday after experiencing side effects from his ongoing cancer treatment, Buckingham Palace announced.

The palace said in a statement that after receiving scheduled treatment in the morning, the king had "temporary side effects that required a short period of observation in hospital."

Keep ReadingShow less