An anti-racism campaigner has won Miss Wales 2022 title, becoming the first woman of colour to achieve the feat in more than two decades.
The crowning moment came for Darcey Corria, from Barry, Vale of Glamorgan, at the finale of the annual pageant held in Newport over the weekend.
Having been an advocate of zero- tolerance for racism, the daughter of a white mother and a father of Jamaican heritage, called upon girls to "embrace their ethnicity".
"I think it's extremely important for young women living in Wales who are of mixed ethnicity or black or Asian to feel like they are represented in every aspect of life. Young women, especially younger girls, will feel that there is somebody that they can relate to in the media which is something that I really struggled with when I was growing up. I really couldn't relate to anybody," she told BBC.
Corria, 21, also volunteers for the Race Equality First charity and helps women from black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds with fitness classes free of charge.
She also took part in the Black Lives Matter march a couple of years ago and helped shape the anti-racism plans in Wales.
“I am proud of my mixed heritage and I represent the diversity that Wales has to offer,” Corria said in her profile.
“Winning the title of Miss Vale of Glamorgan 2019 was a pivotal moment in my life and lit the fire in my stomach to push for change.
“I am extremely passionate about working towards equality for people of all ethnicities in Wales. Having been a victim of racism myself, I was pleased to be invited to go through the Criminal Justice in Wales Anti-Racism Delivery Plan called Together Stronger”, she said.
Corria will represent Wales at the Miss World pageant.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
More For You
Ambanis set to acquire minority stake in Hundred’s Oval Invincibles
Jan 31, 2025
THE OWNERS of the Indian Premier League (IPL) team Mumbai Indians have reportedly secured a deal to acquire a 49 per cent stake in Oval Invincibles, a franchise in England’s Hundred competition.
Reports on Thursday stated that Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), which owns Mumbai Indians, emerged as the successful bidder.
All eight city-based teams in the Hundred, each with a men’s and women’s side, are expected to be paired with preferred investors over the next week.
The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) aims to attract private investment to remain competitive in the global market and secure top international players.
According to ESPNCricinfo, RIL won a virtual auction for the minority stake, valued at around £60 million. The company will now enter an exclusivity period to negotiate terms with county club Surrey and the ECB.
Oval Invincibles, based at the Oval in London, are the reigning champions in the men’s Hundred competition.
Mumbai Indians are considered one of the most influential franchises in the IPL. Mukesh Ambani, chairman and managing director of RIL, is among India’s leading business figures.
Surrey chairman Oli Slipper had previously assured club members that Surrey "must and will retain the controlling stake" in the Invincibles.
The ECB has not commented on the deal and is expected to announce the results of all eight tenders once the process concludes in the coming days.
The Hundred has drawn criticism from some English county cricket supporters who argue that the tournament takes key players away from their teams during the domestic season.
However, the ECB has stated that proceeds from selling stakes in the eight franchises will help fund the 18 county clubs.
(With inputs from AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
Exclusive: How will UK and India woo Trump?
Jan 31, 2025
DONALD TRUMP’S second term as US president will call for a pragmatic approach by the UK, experts have said, adding that India may yet benefit from the America-China “power struggle”.
V Muraleedharan served as former junior foreign minister in India from 2019 to 2024. He told Eastern Eye India wants to sustain a “strong and healthy” relationship with the US under Trump.
“India’s foreign policy is not tied to the individuals in power in a particular country. We always aim to protect India’s interests, and changes in administration in any country do not alter that approach,” he said.
“Recently, there have been changes in administration in countries such as the UK, Sri Lanka and Japan. However, we continue to maintain strong diplomatic relations with them.
“India’s prime minister Narendra Modi has a good relationship with the US president. This rapport might prove beneficial for the country.”
Muraleedharan was the minister of state for external affairs when Trump visited India in 2020.
He said, “India always wants to maintain a country-to-country and peopleto-people connection.”
Trump and India’s prime minister spoke on a call on Monday (27), when the US president pressed Modi for “fair” trading ties and also discussed plans for a visit to the White House, a readout of the call said.
US secretary of state Marco Rubio with India’s foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in Washington DC last Tuesday (21)
It came a day after British prime minister Sir Keir Starmer spoke to Trump last Sunday (26) in a wide-ranging conversation on Gaza and the economy.
“The two leaders stressed the importance of the close and warm ties between the UK and the US, and the president spoke of his respect and affection for the royal family,” a Downing Street statement said. “They agreed to meet soon and looked forward to further discussions then.”
Trump began the call by offering condolences for the death of Starmer’s brother Nick last month.
The US president praised Starmer last Saturday (25) for doing “a very good job”.
“I think he’s done a very good job thus far,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. “I like him a lot”.
Alice Copland, policy and parliamentary affairs manager at the UK’s Foreign Policy Centre, told Eastern Eye, “Keir Starmer and his colleagues have been clear in their intention to pursue good relationships with Trump and his allies and develop the US-UK relationship.
Anit Mukherjee
“Trump’s positive remarks about Starmer and their call over the weekend will be seen as a boost. However, the future remains ambiguous, particularly as the UK government also prioritises its manifesto commitment to ‘reset relationships’ with Europe and deliver steadfast support for NATO.
“What this means for the ‘special relationship’ remains to be seen.”
“The raft of executive orders signed by Trump in his first few days in office provide an indication of future challenges that could impact the UK’s relationship with the US. Withdrawal from the World Health Organisation and the Paris Climate Agreement are prominent examples, and these breaks from international norms and institutions could provide a point of tension for Starmer and his cabinet as they attempt to build productive relationships with US counterparts.
V Muraleedharan
“Looking forward, there will be no moment where the USUK relationship is ‘secured’. What often appears to be impulsive policymaking by Trump and an increased use of social media to outline priorities will mean that uncertainty will always remain. It’s going to be an ongoing balancing act for Starmer, when at any moment Trump, and his officials and allies, might suddenly upset the apple cart.”
Starmer last Sunday praised Trump for his “role in securing the landmark ceasefire and hostages deal in Gaza,” as they discussed the “importance of working together for security in the Middle East”.
Trump, meanwhile welcomed the release of BritishIsraeli dual national Emily Damari, who was freed a week ago by Hamas.
Trump also “expressed his well wishes for the King and the royal family”.
The two leaders discussed “how both countries can promote a fair bilateral economic relationship,” with Downing Street highlighting the UK’s efforts at “deregulating to boost growth.”
Dr Sasikumar S Sundaram
Starmer is keen to promote Britain to Trump and big US companies as the Labour government seeks new sources of investment to try to breathe life into a stagnant British economy.
“There are some real tensions between the Trump administration and the UK, particularly regarding how the UK government, under Starmer, supported Kamala Harris’s run for presidency,” Dr Sasikumar S Sundaram, senior lecturer at the department of international politics at City, University of London, and vicechair of the Global South Caucus, told Eastern Eye.
He added, “[Billionaire businessman] Elon Musk really does not like this because he believes it’s a far-left government which is engaged in woke politics. Having said that, the current UK government is also very pragmatic about trying to ensure they achieve the deal without creating a lot of performances, public appearances, and media frenzy.
“The biggest debate will be on tariffs and whether the UK will be affected by Trump’s tariff plan. The government has already made plans to establish proper mechanisms to avoid the sort of ‘tariff bite’.”
Sundaram dwelt on Britain and America’s ties with Asia. “The US also wants to have trade deals with India. There will be a lot of competition between these two countries as to how to approach India for new trade deals,” he said.
“We know that Narendra Modi and Trump are good friends, and they want to use their personal charisma to create more trade deals.
“However, the UK would also try to appeal to Indian industries and try to create a more favourable investment climate.” In his view, India will play the role of a “swing state” in global geopolitics, in terms of placing its central role between the US and the UK. Sundaram said, “Whether those deals can be delivered by the Indian industry is an entirely different question. India still wants to protect domestic industry that resonates with Hindu nationalism. But the real politics is not in focusing on Hindu nationalism, but on being pragmatic to leverage the role of state in global geopolitics. For this, India should reduce its emphasis on Hindu nationalism versus the liberal international order, and focus on what is in India’s best interest in a decade from now. The resolution of tensions with China is a right step in that direction.”
Trump on Monday stressed the importance of India buying more American-made security equipment and moving toward a fair bilateral trading relationship in his phone call with Modi. Both leaders also spoke about immigration. It is anticipated that Modi will visit the US some time in February.
Modi and Trump enjoyed warm relations during the president’s first term, but during his re-election campaign last year, he called India a “very big abuser” on trade and vowed to use tariffs on global imports into the US to correct imbalances.
The US is India’s largest trading partner. Two-way trade surpassed $118 billion (£93.4bn) in 2023-2024, with India posting a surplus of $32bn (£25.4bn).
Trump has also threatened the BRICS group of nations, of which India is a part, with tariffs if they did not accept his demand of committing to not creating a new currency.
Anit Mukherjee, senior lecturer at Kings College, London, said he expected continuity rather than change in Trump’s relations with both the UK and India.
“The UK understands the importance of its partnership with the US, and the Americans also understand it. While there are apprehensions about the role of Elon Musk and his understanding with Keir Starmer, overall I do not see a big shift in UK-US relations,” Mukherjee told Eastern Eye.
He said the comments by some in the Trump administration were just part of a “social media storm”.
“In the world of diplomacy, people don’t get swayed by that. I think that’s just something you will see more in the X world than in the real world.
“While those concerns may have been expressed by some people close to Trump, eventually the president will not be swayed by such arguments and will actually look for what’s in it for America,” the academic said.
He believes the US will be looking at India to buy more American goods of all kinds, especially in the defence sector.
“Apart from that, there shouldn’t much change, since US-India ties enjoy bipartisan support. Moreover, the current form of the Quad came about during the first Trump administration and so there should be more continuity than change,” Mukherjee added.
Dr Uma Purushothaman, an assistant professor in the department of international relations and politics at the Central University of Kerala, said Trump was likely to pursue a more active policy of managing China’s rise by focusing on the Indo-Pacific.
India is also an important strategic partner in US efforts to counter China.
“Trump’s conciliatory approach towards Russia would give India more flexibility in its foreign policy. However, concerns over tariffs and illegal and legal immigration from India would remain, meaning it’s not going to be a totally smooth ride for IndoUS relations,” she said.
There was also likely to be less pressure on concerns over human rights from the US, she added.
D Dhanuraj, founder and chairman of Centre for Public Policy Research, an India-based thinktank, said India should work to strengthen the institutional mechanisms in mutually beneficial areas, instead of falling into sensitive matters that the new administration is focusing on in its early days.
“India must wait and watch the administration’s approach to India and south Asia, for some time. Continuous engagement with the administration and focusing on the commitments from both sides on the deliverables is the way to go, at this stage,” he said.
Keep ReadingShow less
Trump blames diversity policies for Washington air collision
Jan 31, 2025
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump on Thursday blamed diversity hiring policies for a mid-air collision between an airliner and a military helicopter over Washington’s Potomac River, which left 67 people dead.
Speaking at a press conference, Trump confirmed that all those aboard both aircraft had died and cited pilot error on the military helicopter as a factor in the crash. However, he focused on diversity policies under former presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama, claiming they prevented qualified employees from being hired at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
"I put safety first. Obama, Biden and the Democrats put policy first," Trump said. "They actually came out with a directive: 'too white.' And we want the people that are competent."
As Trump spoke, police divers searched for more bodies in the river.
The wreckage of the Bombardier jet, operated by an American Airlines subsidiary, remained partially above water, surrounded by emergency vessels. The jet had been carrying 64 people. The Black Hawk helicopter, with three soldiers on board, was also in the river.
"We are now at a point where we are switching from a rescue operation to a recovery operation," Washington Fire Chief John Donnelly said, confirming that 28 bodies had been found so far.
The crash took place late Wednesday evening as the airliner approached Reagan National Airport after a routine flight from Wichita, Kansas. It was the first major air accident in the US since 2009, when 49 people died in a crash near Buffalo, New York.
Reagan National is located near downtown Washington and the Pentagon, with heavy air traffic from both civilian and military aircraft.
Air traffic control audio recorded controllers repeatedly asking the helicopter if it had the passenger jet "in sight" before instructing it to "pass behind" the plane just before the collision.
At the press conference, Trump expressed sympathy for the victims before criticising diversity, equity, and inclusion policies.
He also singled out Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, saying, "He's run it right into the ground with his diversity."
Vice president JD Vance and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also spoke, claiming that diversity hiring practices had led to unqualified personnel in key positions. When asked by reporters whether he blamed diversity for the crash, Trump responded, "It could have been."
Rescue teams worked through the night in freezing conditions, searching for debris and bodies. Some wreckage was found a mile downriver.
Among the passengers were several US figure skaters and coaches, according to US Figure Skating. Russian officials confirmed that former world pairs champions Evgenia Shishkova and Vadim Naumov were also on board.
Air traffic controllers monitoring the situation at the time of the collision reported seeing a fireball before losing contact with the helicopter. "I just saw a fireball and it was gone," one controller was heard saying.
Transport officials said both aircraft were following standard flight paths under clear weather conditions.
Defence secretary Hegseth said the Black Hawk crew was conducting a routine night evaluation.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said, "Do I think this was preventable? Absolutely."
Trump also commented on the flight paths, saying the helicopter was "going at an angle that was unbelievably bad."
He referred to the air traffic controller’s final instructions, adding, "There was very little time left when that was stated," and blamed a "confluence of bad decisions."
Keep ReadingShow less
Crackdown on ‘fake news’ sparks dissent in Pakistan
Jan 31, 2025
PAKISTAN criminalised online disinformation on Tuesday (28), passing legislation dictating punishments of up to three years in jail and prompting journalist protests accusing the government of quashing dissent.
The law targets anyone who “intentionally disseminates” information online that they have “reason to believe to be false or fake and likely to cause or create a sense of fear, panic or disorder or unrest”.
It was rushed through the National Assembly with little warning last week before being approved by the Senate on Tuesday as reporters walked out of the gallery in protest.
Facebook, TikTok and WhatsApp are among the most popular social media platforms in Pakistan, where low digital literacy fuels the spread of false information, conspiracy theories and deepfakes.
Some YouTube journalists blur the line between reporting and heavily partisan commentary tailored to their millions of followers. Many lack fact-checking skills and contribute to spreading false information, garnering thousands of views.
“I am sure that in the future, the anarchy caused in society through social media will be controlled,” government minister Tanveer Hussain said as the bill was approved.
It will now be passed to the president to be rubber-stamped.
The new law says social media platforms must register with a newly established regulatory body, with non-compliance leading to temporary or permanent bans.
It also grants Pakistan’s intelligence agencies the authority to investigate disinformation and allows any citizen to file a case.
Senior journalist Asif Bashir Chaudhry, a member of the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists, said the government had assured reporters they would be consulted, but they were “betrayed and backstabbed”.
“We genuinely wanted a law against misinformation, but if it’s not being done through open discussion but rather through fear and coercion, we will challenge it on every available platform,” Chaudhry said.
“Even under dictatorships, legislation was not forcefully rammed through parliament the way this government is doing now.”
Pakistan media workers have reported rising state censorship in recent years and the public has shifted to consuming much of its news from social media.
“The mainstream media is already compromised. That’s the reason why many journalists turned to YouTube,” YouTube journalist Asad Ali Toor said in the capital Islamabad, where more than 150 journalists rallied against the bill.
“The state wants the same control of social media as it is controlling the mainstream media,” Toor said.
Around 50 journalists also protested the bill outside the press club of the southern city of Karachi on Tuesday afternoon.
Analysts said the government is struggling with legitimacy after elections last February plagued by rigging allegations, and with former prime minister Imran Khan jailed on corruption charges he insists are politically motivated.
Khan’s supporters and senior lieutenants in his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party have faced a crackdown, with thousands rounded up and Khan’s name censored from television.
Much of PTI’s campaigning has moved online where the party’s young tech-savvy base has continually called for protests.
PTI senator Syed Shibli Faraz called the new law “highly undemocratic” and said it would “fuel the political victimisation” of their supporters.
Digital rights activist Nighat Dad said there has been “one restrictive law after another, introduced under the guise of public interest or national security”.
The real intent is “consolidating power and controlling the narrative,” she said.
Social media site X was shut down in the wake of February’s election, as posts alleging vote tampering spread on the platform.
Pakistan is ranked 152 out of 180 countries in a press freedom index compiled by Reporters Without Borders.
At least 239 cases against journalists accused of spreading “fake news” have been recorded in south and southeast Asia since 2018, according to the Anti-Fake News Lawfare online database.
In Pakistan, even before the new legislation, journalists have faced arrest under terrorism legislation which civil rights monitors said is used as a cudgel on dissent.
Keep ReadingShow less
India shifts defence strategy while balancing western ties and Russian legacy
Jan 31, 2025
INDIA’S efforts to pare back its reliance on Russian military hardware are bearing fruit after the courting of new Western allies and a rapidly growing domestic arms industry, analysts said.
At a time when Moscow’s military-industrial complex is occupied with the ongoing war in Ukraine, India has made the modernisation of its armed forces a top priority.
That urgency has risen in tandem with tensions between the world’s most populous nation and its northern neighbour China, especially since a deadly 2020 clash between their troops.
“India’s perception of its security environment vis-a-vis China has been dramatically altered,” Harsh V Pant, of the New Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation think-tank, said.
Relations between the neighbours went into freefall after the clash on their shared frontier, which killed 20 Indian and at least four Chinese soldiers.
“It has sort of shaken the system and there’s a realisation that we have to do whatever is best now, and very fast,” Pant said of the incident.
India has become the world’s largest arms importer with purchases steadily rising to account for nearly 10 per cent of all imports globally in 2019-23, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said last year.
Workers clean communication equipment aboard INS Surat on January 11
More is in the pipeline, with orders worth tens of billions of dollars from the United States, France, Israel and Germany in coming years.
Modi will be in France next month where he is expected to sign deals worth about $10 billion (£8.03bn) for Rafale fighter jets and Scorpene-class submarines, Indian media reports say.
Defence minister Rajnath Singh has also promised at least $100bn (£80.3bn) in fresh domestic military hardware contracts by 2033 to spur local arms production.
“India has been traditionally an importer for decades and only switched to emphasising on indigenous manufacturing... in the last decade,” strategic affairs analyst Nitin Gokhale said.
“It is not easy to switch, not everything can be manufactured or produced here,” he said, saying the country lacked the ability to manufacture “highend technology” weapons systems.
But its efforts have still seen numerous impressive milestones.
This decade India has opened an expansive new helicopter factory, launched its first homemade aircraft carrier, and conducted a successful longrange hypersonic missile test. That in turn has fostered a growing arms export market which saw sales last year worth $2.63bn (£2.1bn) – still a tiny amount compared to established players, but a 30-fold increase in a decade.
India is expected in the coming weeks to announce a landmark deal to supply Indonesia’s military with supersonic cruise missiles in a deal worth nearly $450 million (£361.7m).
The government aims to treble this figure by 2029, with a significant chunk of the $75bn (£6.02bn) it spent on defence last year aimed at boosting local production and innovation.
India has deepened defence cooperation with Western countries in recent years, including in the much-feted Quad alliance with the United States, Japan and Australia.
This reorientation has helped India sign various deals to import and locally co-produce military drones, naval ships, fighter jets and other hardware with suppliers from Western countries.
It has also led to a precipitous drop in India’s share of arms from longstanding ally Russia, which supplied 76 per cent of its military imports in 2009- 2013, but only 36 per cent in 2019-2023, according to SIPRI data.
New Delhi has nonetheless sought to maintain the delicate balance between India’s historically warm ties with Moscow while courting closer partnerships with Western nations.
Modi’s government has resisted pressure from Washington and elsewhere to explicitly condemn Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, instead urging both sides to the negotiating table.
Gokhale said India was not in the position to abandon its relationship with Russia, which still plays an important role as a supplier of advanced weaponry including cruise missiles and nuclear submarine technology.
“India has certainly spread its risks by sourcing from other countries,” he said. “But Russia remains a very important and dependable partner.”
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More
© Copyright 2025 Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd & Asian Media Group USA Inc