Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Barnie Choudhury: ‘I believe we all have a right to offend, but race should be left out of it’

IT TOOK me all of one second to conclude that Danny Baker would be sacked.

That’s not because I’m a paid-up member of the politically correct brigade. Look at my record, and you’ll see that I have a habit of speaking unpalatable truths.


The experienced broadcaster tweeted a photograph of a couple with a chimpanzee in the middle, with the words “Royal baby leaves hospital”. It was racist. Full stop. Forget the intention. Forget stupidity. Forget momentary loss of common sense. It was racist. And the BBC’s head of Five Live, Jonathan Wall, had no option but to sack him.

What made Baker’s stance worse was his defence in a follow-up tweet. Anyone thinking it was racist had a “diseased mind”, he said. To his credit, once he had taken the emotion out of his dismissal, Baker admitted on Twitter that he had “f****d up badly”.

What this shows me is how, in the age of sharing our every thought on social media, we have forgotten to take a breath and think before we post. Unlike unrecorded words said in haste, cyberspace mean everything we say is there in perpetuity. You can’t take it back, no matter how young or inexperienced you were when you first said it.

Hamza Choudhury (no relation), the Leicester City player, knows that. Last week, the Football Association fined him £5,000 and ordered him to attend a course for offensive – some would say homophobic and racist – tweets he posted six years ago when he 15.

Look, I believe that we all have a right to offend. If we force people to say and do things in dark corners, like poisonous fungi they will thrive, infest and infect things around them. I was castigated by some Asian colleagues in the BBC for giving the then leader of the British National Party, Nick Griffin, airtime after he revealed that a Sikh group wanted to join him to fight against Muslims. But to this day, I believe you have to face racists and those with whom you have ideological differences head-on. You beat them with reasoned argument.

That’s what we do in a democracy.

So what I am about to say next may offend some diversity practitioners and readers. I believe the Macpherson definition of institutional racism is fundamentally flawed. He defined it as “the collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. ... which amounts to discrimination through unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness and racist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people.”

It is flawed because of one word, ‘unwitting’, which hands racists a free get-out-of-jail-card. We need to be honest and admit to ourselves that we all have prejudices, and some cause more harm than others. If you do not like someone, act differently with or disadvantage someone because they have a different skin colour or are from a different race, then you are racist, whether you want to hide behind your ‘unwitting prejudice’.

And racism is not exclusively a white problem. We Asians are just as racist as those about whom we often complain.

The unpalatable and uncomfortable truth is that despite living together for more than 50 years in the UK, there are some Asian families who have disowned, and will continue to disown, their child if they marry someone from a different race, religion or caste.

Further, some will hire bounty hunters to track down their errant offspring and force them into marriage. And in extreme cases, some will kill their son or daughter, brother or sister, or intended bride or groom in the name of honour.

Let’s get real. We are masters at pointing the finger at others while turning a blind eye to our faults. Despite all the progress that has been made, the UK is still divided along racial lines. We have far to go to break down racial taboos, thoughts and traditions. There are UK communities which have never seen a brown face or tasted an authentic home-made curry or an English roast.

So, what now for Baker who tweeted he had one of the worst days of his life? A national newspaper or independent radio station is sure to snap him up. Who says unwitting stupidity doesn’t pay?

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less