Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Barnie Choudhury: ‘I believe we all have a right to offend, but race should be left out of it’

IT TOOK me all of one second to conclude that Danny Baker would be sacked.

That’s not because I’m a paid-up member of the politically correct brigade. Look at my record, and you’ll see that I have a habit of speaking unpalatable truths.


The experienced broadcaster tweeted a photograph of a couple with a chimpanzee in the middle, with the words “Royal baby leaves hospital”. It was racist. Full stop. Forget the intention. Forget stupidity. Forget momentary loss of common sense. It was racist. And the BBC’s head of Five Live, Jonathan Wall, had no option but to sack him.

What made Baker’s stance worse was his defence in a follow-up tweet. Anyone thinking it was racist had a “diseased mind”, he said. To his credit, once he had taken the emotion out of his dismissal, Baker admitted on Twitter that he had “f****d up badly”.

What this shows me is how, in the age of sharing our every thought on social media, we have forgotten to take a breath and think before we post. Unlike unrecorded words said in haste, cyberspace mean everything we say is there in perpetuity. You can’t take it back, no matter how young or inexperienced you were when you first said it.

Hamza Choudhury (no relation), the Leicester City player, knows that. Last week, the Football Association fined him £5,000 and ordered him to attend a course for offensive – some would say homophobic and racist – tweets he posted six years ago when he 15.

Look, I believe that we all have a right to offend. If we force people to say and do things in dark corners, like poisonous fungi they will thrive, infest and infect things around them. I was castigated by some Asian colleagues in the BBC for giving the then leader of the British National Party, Nick Griffin, airtime after he revealed that a Sikh group wanted to join him to fight against Muslims. But to this day, I believe you have to face racists and those with whom you have ideological differences head-on. You beat them with reasoned argument.

That’s what we do in a democracy.

So what I am about to say next may offend some diversity practitioners and readers. I believe the Macpherson definition of institutional racism is fundamentally flawed. He defined it as “the collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. ... which amounts to discrimination through unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness and racist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people.”

It is flawed because of one word, ‘unwitting’, which hands racists a free get-out-of-jail-card. We need to be honest and admit to ourselves that we all have prejudices, and some cause more harm than others. If you do not like someone, act differently with or disadvantage someone because they have a different skin colour or are from a different race, then you are racist, whether you want to hide behind your ‘unwitting prejudice’.

And racism is not exclusively a white problem. We Asians are just as racist as those about whom we often complain.

The unpalatable and uncomfortable truth is that despite living together for more than 50 years in the UK, there are some Asian families who have disowned, and will continue to disown, their child if they marry someone from a different race, religion or caste.

Further, some will hire bounty hunters to track down their errant offspring and force them into marriage. And in extreme cases, some will kill their son or daughter, brother or sister, or intended bride or groom in the name of honour.

Let’s get real. We are masters at pointing the finger at others while turning a blind eye to our faults. Despite all the progress that has been made, the UK is still divided along racial lines. We have far to go to break down racial taboos, thoughts and traditions. There are UK communities which have never seen a brown face or tasted an authentic home-made curry or an English roast.

So, what now for Baker who tweeted he had one of the worst days of his life? A national newspaper or independent radio station is sure to snap him up. Who says unwitting stupidity doesn’t pay?

More For You

Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’
Kanishka Narayan (centre) with fellow visiting British MPs, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma (left) and other officials

‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’

Kanishka Narayan

FOUR months since my election to parliament, I had the opportunity to join my parliamentary colleagues on a delegation to India, visiting Delhi and Jaipur for conversations with our Indian counterparts, business leaders and academics.

I went to make the case for Indian investment in my constituency and across the UK.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’
(From left) Professor Ted Cantle, Sunder Katwala, Sara Khan and John Denham at the event

‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’

Sunder Katwala

“SOCIAL cohesion is not the absence of riots.”

John Denham put that central point pithily at the ‘After the Riots’ cohesion summit last week.

Keep ReadingShow less