Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Barnie Choudhury: Voters want someone to resolve this Eton mess

by BARNIE CHOUDHURY

Former BBC journalist


“I AM completely party-less,” were the words of my friend Ashish as we met for lunch last week.

In the turmoil of Brexit, I dismissed it as hyperbole. He continued, “I hate the Tories, can’t stand Corbyn, and I know I am liberal and a democrat, but am a leaver, even now.”

Not only does he feel that he has no party, he also feels that his vote does not count. Ashish lives in an area where if you put a red rosette on a dog, it would get in. Then it hit me. Up and down the country there are thousands of people like Ashish. South Asians who have voted all their lives for Labour, would never vote for ‘the racist party’ and believe in a fair, supportive and democratic society where we offer a hand up and not handouts. So how have we come to this?

Former prime minister David Cameron is how. If only he had not promised a referendum on a binary issue of in or out of Europe. Indeed, if he had done what countless Tories have been doing for years, burying their heads in the sand and ignored the trap that is EU membership, we would not be in this mess.

I interviewed Cameron for the BBC when he was the opposition leader during the 2005 elections. As I spoke to him, I realised the power of an independent school education and someone moulded to think his destiny was to lead his country, as countless Etonians have done over the centuries.

When I met him years later, when he was no longer the prime minister, he was kind enough to pretend he remembered me.

The snippets of Cameron’s memoirs I have read reveal his thinking leading up to that fateful decision. His chancellor, George Osborne, advised him against calling a referendum. But hubris won the day. After all, he had won the Scottish independence referendum, and, in his words, he was ‘lucky’. How could he lose?

The thing about autobiographies is that you get to write the version of history you wish you had. It is your perception, it is your reality, and therefore it is true, no matter what others say or experienced. But Cameron has forgotten the most telling axiom: history is written by the victor and losers can be as Vicky Pollard (Little Britain ‘yes but, no but...’ character) as they like, no one will believe them.

What Cameron has done is to be expected. He has had to come up with a reason, for his own sanity, for making a terrible mistake, rather than own up to a human failing that none of us is perfect. The most honest thing he has said thus far is, ‘I failed’.

Few will disagree with that. Cameron failed himself, and he failed the country. His lack of thinking through the implications of what would happen if, heaven forbid, he lost, or that in politics you don’t have friends, or that the other side would lie and cheat to win, meant failure.

The former prime minister relied too much on his ‘luck’ and forgot that the best lawyers never ask a question to which they do not know the answer. It is easy for me to chastise Cameron. I am not an ego-driven politician who believes his destiny is to run his country.

Speaking of ego-driven politicians with this belief, in the next few weeks we are likely to have to choose our next prime minister. It will be the third general election in four years, and Asians will hold the key in several key marginal seats. It is our best chance of getting the law makers we deserve.

There is a new generation of south Asians who will be voting for the first time. They will not care one jot about Cameron or history or how we came to be where we are today. They will vote for the party which promises them a better and safer world, free from the existential threat of climate change, free from racism and class prejudice, and free from unfairness which strangles hope and opportunities.

At least that is how I felt when I first voted. Speaking to a group at the University of Buckingham, where I am a professor, I distinctly felt the audience wanting something basic – someone to deliver us from this Eton mess.

For my friend Ashish, the pessimism is gut-wrenching. He cannot see a way out of his quandary. At this time in our history, perhaps we simply need a leap of faith and believe that, no matter what, Britain, a former superpower, can find its mojo once again. Or is that too Cameron-esque?

More For You

Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’
Kanishka Narayan (centre) with fellow visiting British MPs, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma (left) and other officials

‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’

Kanishka Narayan

FOUR months since my election to parliament, I had the opportunity to join my parliamentary colleagues on a delegation to India, visiting Delhi and Jaipur for conversations with our Indian counterparts, business leaders and academics.

I went to make the case for Indian investment in my constituency and across the UK.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’
(From left) Professor Ted Cantle, Sunder Katwala, Sara Khan and John Denham at the event

‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’

Sunder Katwala

“SOCIAL cohesion is not the absence of riots.”

John Denham put that central point pithily at the ‘After the Riots’ cohesion summit last week.

Keep ReadingShow less