Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Barnie Choudhury: 'We must stop the politics of religion division in Britain'

by BARNIE CHOUDHURY

Former BBC journalist


I LOVE general election night, and to be more precise, I love being in the thick of it.

So, I was super-excited to be at an election count for the first time in 15 years last Thursday (12). It was Leicester, my home city, and unlike the rest of the country, this part of the red wall was expected to stay intact. Apart from Leicester East, despite its mammoth near-22,500 Labour majority, the rest was a forgone conclusion.

But as it turned out, it was a close call. Let us look at why this was.

Every south Asian I spoke to thought that Labour’s Claudia Webbe was parachuted into this

constituency after the incumbent MP, Keith Vaz, stood down in disgrace. They were angry

that one of their own was not considered, never mind make it to the shortlist.

But that was not the only reason for their anger. Webbe had the misfortune to preside over

an ill-thought out, ill-executed and illegitimate motion at the Labour party’s annual conference condemning the Indian prime minister Narendra Modi’s decision to keep an election pledge to support Kashmiri Hindus who felt they had been driven out of the state.

My sources tell me that Webbe was the unwitting victim in all this. They say the former deputy leader, Tom Watson, was supposed to chair the motion but was ill, so Webbe was asked to take his place. If true, then she was wrongly labelled the villain and requires an apology.

I believe it was unwise for Labour to criticise Modi. The Conservative party was clever

enough to see this as the trap it was and avoided mentioning it. I bet Labour supporters wished their party was just as politically astute.

Modi’s influence spreads across the UK. The Hindu-Indian diaspora is massive here and

their votes can make, break and send a message to politicians. Economically they contribute to political parties and their campaigns. In under six weeks, a majority of 22,000-plus in Leicester East was reduced to just over 6,000. Unthinkable, even with the ‘Corbyn factor’ because Vaz, for all his faults, was recognised as a top-notch constituency MP. ‘Mess with us at our peril’ was their message.

But it was not just Leicester East which was targeted. I have written before about the WhatsApp group set up by BJP supporters saying any Hindu who votes for Labour is a traitor. Well, that group’s fingerprints were all over other Hindu-rich constituencies.

Take Brent North, whose MP is the shadow international trade secretary, Barry Gardiner.

Sources tell me that on the doorstep, Hindus said to Gardiner they would not be voting for

him because of the party’s stance on Kashmir. Gardiner is a decent man who loves India,

has watched more Bollywood movies than me, and can speak Hindi better than I can. He

won with a slightly reduced majority.

This cannot be good. The politics of the Indian subcontinent has always played a part in

our elections – when our parents first arrived in the UK, Labour made sure it was the party for them, and former Wolverhamp on South West MP, Enoch Powell, made the job easier.

But this time, what played out on social media was nothing more than south Asian coun-

tries interfering in our politics. A deep-dive analysis of south Asian voting in the 2019 election by a reputable organisation will, I believe, show that what began as a small

problem is now a major headache with malevolent consequences.

But it is more than interference. Lest we forget, India was founded on the principles of a

secular state. Its first prime minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru promised that non-Hindus

were not only welcome in the country of their birth, but they would also be safe and have the same rights as the Hindu majority. What we are seeing now is the final destruction of that dream, and what is worse is that it has made its way to the UK.

This cancer needs to be eviscerated because we south Asians forget at our peril that we are a minority. The greater our divisions the smaller our voice becomes. Indian history tells us Empire flourished on divide and rule, and we allowed that to happen. Unless we learn from history, we British south Asians are sleep-walking towards a politics of malignant religious division. And that will not help us gain the democratic rights we expect, deserve and need.

More For You

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’
Kanishka Narayan (centre) with fellow visiting British MPs, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma (left) and other officials

‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’

Kanishka Narayan

FOUR months since my election to parliament, I had the opportunity to join my parliamentary colleagues on a delegation to India, visiting Delhi and Jaipur for conversations with our Indian counterparts, business leaders and academics.

I went to make the case for Indian investment in my constituency and across the UK.

Keep ReadingShow less