Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Barry Gardiner: MPs must stand firm to prevent Britain crashing out of the EU

by BARRY GARDINER

Labour MP for Brent North and shadow international trade secretary


IT HAS been widely reported that when asked what he wanted to be when he grew up, a young Boris Johnson answered, “world king!”

It is less widely reported that when US president Donald Trump heard this story he simply asked, “But how could there be two of us?”

Last Saturday (1), as tens of thousands of ordinary citizens demonstrated opposite Downing Street in a packed Whitehall, my eyes kept flicking to a small balcony of Banqueting House where on January 30, 370 years ago, a previous “world king” had been executed. His crime? Proroguing parliament.

The chant last Saturday was “Stop the Coup”. And it was important that the very first speaker was a Brexiteer – a paid-up Leaver. His eloquent point was simply this: “I voted leave to bring back sovereignty to the British parliament, not to have that parliament silenced and sidelined by an unelected prime minister.”

No deal was not an option at the time of the referendum, and this prime minister has no mandate for a no-deal Brexit. And prorogation is simply a technical manoeuvre to prevent parliament legislating to ensure the government does not take the UK out of the EU without a deal.

Cabinet ministers, embarrassed by their previous dismissal of the very idea of prorogation, now try to claim this is really only an extended conference recess. But here is the difference – parliament can be recalled in the recess. In prorogation, it can’t. Prorogation normally lasts eight days. This one lasts five weeks.

In fact, the last time we had an extended prorogation was just before the 1997 general election when the Conservative prime minister, John Major, wanted to prevent parliament scrutinising the cash-for-questions scandal before the country went to the polls. Ironic then, that even he has now joined the legal challenge to the prime minister to stop prorogation.

This paper’s print deadline, as parliament meets on Tuesday (3), means that any prediction that you read here requires a very bold judgement call. But  what is clear is we are closer now to leaving the EU without a deal than ever before; the meeting last week by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn shows that opposition party leaders are now united and resolute in their determination to legislate to avoid no deal; and proroguing parliament is an attempt to ensure that this cannot be done before the EU Summit on October 17-18.

This week we will find out whether there are sufficient MPs who – regardless of whether they wanted to leave or remain – are ready to stake their political career on saying that ‘leaving without a deal is unacceptable’.  Tremendous pressure is being put on Conservative MPs. They are told to vote with their party rather than for what they believe to be the interest of the country. In truth, their party no longer exists. It has been captured and turned into the right-wing Brexit Party.

If enough MPs hold firm and put the country first, then an act of parliament could be passed this week that would compel the government to prevent prorogation and rule out leaving without a deal.

At prorogation, all bills that have passed through parliament then receive royal assent and such an act would become binding upon the government. How extraordinary then, on the BBC’s The Andrew Marr Show last Sunday (1), to hear Lord chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Michael Gove, refuse several times to accept that the government would implement such legislation.

This is a government that is shredding our constitutional norms and conventions. Were the opposition leader to have done this, one can scarcely imagine the media outrage. How different it seems is the response when this constitutional coup is perpetrated by a group of old Etonians!

Many suspect that the government is trying to precipitate a general election, an election which they will try to frame as the people versus parliament. But the demonstrations in Whitehall and up and down the country have shown that the real struggle is between an unelected prime minister and the people of Britain who still believe in democracy and parliamentary sovereignty.

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less