Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Channel 4 reality show criticised for recreating refugee journeys

Titled Go Back to Where You Came From, the part-documentary, part-reality TV show by Channel 4 follows the group of six, who hold strong views both for and against immigration.

Channel 4 reality show criticised for recreating refugee journeys

A poster of the show

BRITAIN’S newest reality TV show has been slammed as “insensitive”, “voyeuristic” and even “nauseating” for recreating with six Britons the often fatal journeys made by thousands of refugees to the UK.

Titled Go Back to Where You Came From, the part-documentary, part-reality TV show by Channel 4 follows the group of six, who hold strong views both for and against immigration.


They are divided into two teams, with one dropped into one war-ravaged Raqqa in Syria and the other sent to Mogadishu in Somalia.

Over four episodes which launched last Monday (3), they “experience some of the most perilous parts of the refugee journeys” according to Channel 4 – although they travel largely in armoured vehicles.

The outspoken views of some participants, as well as the show’s format, have been criticised by viewers, charities and some media.

Amnesty International UK called it “deeply disappointing” and “sensational”.

Participant and chef Dave Marshall, 35, opens the series standing on the cliffs of Dover, calling for immigrants crossing the Channel to be “blown up”.

Moments later, political commentator Chloe Dobbs, 24, says that unless immigration is reined in, “Britain will be a hellhole full of people wearing burqas”.

In the first episode, the six are taken to markets where they meet families, play football with kids and accompany them as they search through litter for scraps.

At one point, when they visit a bombed-out family home in Raqqa, Marshall and two others are invited to stay the night.

“Very kind of you for offering your house to us,” replied Marshall, the irony perhaps lost on him. “The series explores the varied and sometimes polarised opinions in our society in a fresh way,” a series spokesperson said.

In upcoming episodes, both groups undertake “challenges”, including a boat crossing and trekking through a Libyan desert. There is no winner of the series, though. Dobbs defended it as a “really fun show that lots of people will tune into”. “More so than just some bog-standard, boring documentary,” she said.

Go Back to Where You Came From is based on a popular Australian series which first ran in the early 2010s.

At around that time, politicians in Australia were campaigning to “stop the boats” of irregular migrants reaching the country. A decade later, the same catchphrase has been seized upon by politicians opposing asylum seekers crossing the Channel to reach Britain.

Some viewers praised Channel 4 for giving a rare primetime spot to the hot-button immigration debate, with British charity Refugee Council “welcoming” the show’s premise.

“Television shows have huge potential to highlight the human stories behind the headlines,” Refugee Council CEO Enver Solomon said.

In one heavily criticised “challenge”, the group get into a dinghy in a simulation of the often fatal Channel crossings.

For Dobbs, who has previously said small boats were made out to be “fun” by some refugees, getting into a flimsy vessel in the middle of the night was a turning point. “It was that moment for me that it really hit me. Gosh, people must be really desperate to get on these boats,” she acknowledged.

However, clips of the simulation sparked outrage across the Channel, with French politician Xavier Bertrand calling for the “nauseating” show to be cancelled. “Hundreds of people have died in the Channel in recent years. This situation is a humanitarian tragedy, not the subject of a game,” Bertrand said on X.

The number of asylum seekers arriving in Britain on small boats after crossing the Channel rose to more than 36,800 in 2024, according to official data.

It was also the deadliest year for migrant crossings, with at least 76 deaths recorded.

According to Dobbs, the show wanted to do something “different”. “Rather than just talking to a migrant about what the boat crossing they did was like, wouldn’t it be even better to simulate it and feel all those emotions for yourself?” (AFP)

More For You

uk-jail-inmate-iStock

At HMP Whitemoor, where Muslims were 43 per cent of inmates, 55 per cent of the use of handcuffs and pain-inducing methods involved Muslim prisoners. (Representational image: iStock)

Muslim prisoners in England more likely to face use of force, charity finds

MUSLIM prisoners in England are more likely to be subjected to force by prison staff, including the use of pain-inducing techniques, according to data obtained by social justice charity Maslaha.

Freedom of information requests filed by Maslaha revealed that in eight out of nine prisons with higher-than-average Muslim populations, Muslim inmates were more likely than other prisoners to face the use of batons, rigid bar handcuffs, or painful restraint methods, reported The Guardian.

Keep ReadingShow less
Asylum seekers' mental health worsened after riots, study finds

FILE PHOTO: Protestors hold placards as they demonstrate in front of members of the media outside of The Queen Elizabeth II Law Courts in Liverpool, north west England on January 23, 2025, ahead of the sentencing Southport attacker Axel Rudakubana.(Photo by DARREN STAPLES/AFP via Getty Images)

Asylum seekers' mental health worsened after riots, study finds

LAST summer's civil unrest harmed the mental wellbeing of asylum seekers across the country, a new study has revealed.

The riots, which followed the killing of three young girls at a dance class in Southport, left many too frightened to leave their accommodation.

Keep ReadingShow less
EY London

The FRC said the probe will look into EY’s audits of the Post Office’s financial statements between 2015 and 2018.

Reuters

FRC launches probe into EY audits of post office

THE Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has launched an investigation into EY’s audit of Post Office Limited, the regulator said on Wednesday.

The move comes as inquiries continue into one of the country’s most serious miscarriages of justice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jonathan Reynolds to visit China despite 'steel tensions'

Jonathan Reynolds reacts during his visit to one of the Blast Furnaces at British Steel's steelworks site in Scunthorpe, northern England, on April 15, 2025. (Photo by DARREN STAPLES/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Jonathan Reynolds to visit China despite 'steel tensions'

BUSINESS and trade secretary Jonathan Reynolds is planning a trip to China later this year aimed at reviving trade relations, despite recent tensions over Chinese investment in the UK's steel sector.

The visit will focus on restarting the UK-China Joint Economic and Trade Commission (JETCO), which has not met since 2018, reported the Guardian. China currently ranks as Britain's fifth-largest trading partner

Keep ReadingShow less
uk-supreme-court

Susan Smith (L) and Marion Calder, directors of 'For Women Scotland' cheer as they leave the Supreme Court on April 16, 2025 in London.

Getty Images

UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of woman means biological sex

THE UNITED KINGDOM's Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that the term "woman" in equality legislation refers to biological sex. However, the court said the ruling would not disadvantage transgender people.

The case centred on whether a transgender woman with a gender recognition certificate is considered a woman under the Equality Act and protected from discrimination on that basis.

Keep ReadingShow less