Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

COMMENT: Lib Dems are fighting to close ethnicity pay gap

By Jo Swinson,

East Dunbartonshire parliamentary candidate and former Lib Dem business minister


THE last two years have illustrated what happens without us. A Conservative-only government showing its true colours: reckless, divisive and uncaring; targeting the working poor, the BBC and junior doctors.

Last autumn saw prime minister Theresa May’s government propose new rules that would force companies to record how many foreign workers they employed – a plan that even UKIP found distasteful.

This week they continued their reckless obsession with overall migration numbers, instead of standing up for what’s best for Britain.

And through Brexit, they have allowed all the good work we did to rescue the economy to be undone.

With our country facing huge challenges, from inequality and injustice to an NHS in crisis and an economy in jeopardy, we are left with a reckless, divisive and uncaring Conservative government that has taken on the vile rhetoric of UKIP.

Politicians must be clear that the referendum result was not a green light to racism and xenophobia. It must have no impact on the multicultural, multi-ethnic and multi-faith society that Britain is and will remain.

That is why policies like mandatory reporting of ethnic pay gaps are so important.

Transparent data on the BAME pay gap will help employers focus on what they need to do to ensure equal opportunities at work for people of all ethnic backgrounds – as well as create awareness and militate against unconscious bias.

This is so important against the rising tide of discrimination.

As a Lib Dem business minister in the coalition, I was successful in fighting an uphill struggle against the Conservatives to get gender pay gap reporting into law, but the fight doesn’t stop there.

It is so sad that in 21st century Britain inequality that comes down to race still persists.

The McGregor-Smith review conducted in the last parliament argued that many companies would only take positive action when targets are set. Monitoring and reporting on the ethnicity pay gap will, first, help inform business and government and, second, motivate businesses to address pay gaps where they are found.

This legislation would not be intended as a stick. We hope organisations would use this as an opportunity to take stock, after all closing the pay gap is not only morally right, but it makes good business sense.

Change won’t happen overnight, but we have to start to address the problem now.

We hope costs like the reputation of their business and implications for staff attraction and retention will encourage the relevant organisations not only to comply but go on to address issues that come to the surface.

Of course, some of the media will choose to concentrate on naming-and-shaming but this is about making progress together. That is why we would consult extensively first to make sure the monitoring and reporting requirements work for business.

With the hardest and most divisive form of Brexit pursued by the Conservatives damaging business, organisations should be encouraged by the McGregor-Smith review’s findings that ending ethnic minority inequality would boost the economy by £24 billion a year.

Gender pay gap reporting is already making employers look again at how they attract, retain, promote and pay women and men.

Transparent data on the BAME pay gap will therefore help employers focus on what they need to do to ensure equal opportunities for people of all ethnic backgrounds.

Against the UKIP-style rhetoric of a likely Conservative government, this is so important.

Every Liberal Democrat vote and every Liberal Democrat MP elected is a therefore a challenge to Theresa May’s hard Brexit and economically reckless agenda.

We are the only party that can challenge Theresa May and provide the strong opposition Britain needs.

More For You

Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’
Kanishka Narayan (centre) with fellow visiting British MPs, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma (left) and other officials

‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’

Kanishka Narayan

FOUR months since my election to parliament, I had the opportunity to join my parliamentary colleagues on a delegation to India, visiting Delhi and Jaipur for conversations with our Indian counterparts, business leaders and academics.

I went to make the case for Indian investment in my constituency and across the UK.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’
(From left) Professor Ted Cantle, Sunder Katwala, Sara Khan and John Denham at the event

‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’

Sunder Katwala

“SOCIAL cohesion is not the absence of riots.”

John Denham put that central point pithily at the ‘After the Riots’ cohesion summit last week.

Keep ReadingShow less