LONDON'S Court of Appeal will rule on Thursday (29) if a British plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is lawful, in a verdict that could make or break prime minister Rishi Sunak's pledge to stop migrants from arriving by boat.
Under a deal struck last year, Britain's government plans to send tens of thousands of asylum seekers who arrive on its shores more than 4,000 miles (6,400 km) to the East African country.
The first planned deportation flight was blocked a year ago in a last-minute ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), which imposed an injunction preventing any deportations until the conclusion of legal action in Britain.
In December, the High Court in London ruled the policy was lawful, but that decision is being challenged by asylum seekers from several countries along with human rights organisations.
The Court of Appeal is due to deliver its verdict at about 10 am local time.
A victory for the government will not mean immediate flights because there may be a further court appeal, and the ECHR injunction prevents any deportations until three weeks after the conclusion of British legal action.
If the judges rule the plan is lawful, a government official said the flights could begin later this year if the courts reject any applications for further legal challenges.
Sunak sees the deportation plan as central to deterring asylum seekers arriving from Europe.
He has made "stop the boats" one of five priorities, and is hoping a fall in arrivals might help his Conservative Party pull off an unexpected win at the next national election.
A spokesman for Sunak would not comment on when the flights could begin.
Sending each asylum seeker to Rwanda will cost on average £169,000, the government said this week in the first detailed economic assessment of the policy.
The main opposition Labour Party called the assessment a "complete joke", and the Scottish National Party accused the government of spending an "astronomical" sum on deportations while failing to help Britons with the rising costs of mortgages and food bills.
The deportation policy is based loosely on Australia's programme of sending migrants to Papua New Guinea and Nauru for processing.
Opponents of the legislation say that the government’s policies are about driving political support and will not solve underlying issues.
There say they are currently no legal routes for most asylum seekers fleeing war or persecution to apply for refugee status to enter Britain, so many see the dangerous small boat crossings as their only option.
Last year, a record 45,755 people came to Britain in small boats across the Channel, mainly from France. More than 11,000 have arrived so far this year, a similar rate to the first half of 2022.
(Reuters)
Court of Appeal to rule on Rwanda plan today
Victory for government will not mean immediate flights as there may be a further court appeal
The investigation has identified Pankaj Lamba as the prime suspect, and Brella’s family in Delhi believe he is in India. (Photo: Northamptonshire Police)
Amrit S Maan OBE JP, an Asian solicitor and businessman has set up a fund in memory of Harshita Brella. (Photo: X/@amritmaanldn)
A protestor is detained by the police during a demonstration against the proposed site of the new Chinese Embassy, outside Royal Mint Court, in London. REUTERS/Carlos Jasso. 
