Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Defending diversity in the Tory party

Defending diversity in the Tory party

ALLEGATIONS of Islamophobia within the Conservative party have been deeply damaging.

They go against the fundamental social fabric of what the party stands for – to promote equality of opportunity to all for a better life, regardless of colour, background or creed.


Such allegations must quite rightly be investigated. There is no room for prejudice within our society, let alone in government.

To date, I have been proud of the Conservative party’s efforts to stamp out prejudice of any kind. This led to Professor Swaran Singh’s review on anti-Muslim prejudice, which found no evidence of institutional Islamophobia within the party.

When it comes to inclusion, the Conservative party has always championed diversity. This is something I have personally championed in my affiliation with the party for more than 40 years.

LEAD Tories Lord Dolar Popat Lord Dolar Popat

The Conservative party that I joined in the 1970s is very different to the one of today. I remember being the only person of colour in local association meetings and annual Conservative party events.

Our cabinet is undoubtedly the most diverse in history. More diverse than the board of any FTSE 100 company. There are more people who are black or brown within the Conservative party today, than the Labour party has ever had in all their cabinets combined. No one can dispute this, and this should be rightly remembered when questioning the party.

I have tears of joy when I see the diversity of our frontbench when I watch Prime Minister’s Questions every week. Never in my lifetime did I envisage this country having a British Indian chancellor, let alone the sheer diversity of the cabinet it reflects.

Aside from Rishi Sunak, we have Priti Patel as the helm of the Home Office. Alok Sharma led the country’s most important political role this year as president of COP26. The country’s topmost legal authority, the attorney general, is Suella Braverman.

DP Comment Dolar Popat INSET GettyImages 1235308153 Kwasi Kwarteng and Priti Patel (Photo by Ben Stansall - WPA Pool/Getty Images)

Sajid Javid and Nadhim Zahawi have led us through the country’s health crisis exceptionally at the most unprecedented time in our history. And we have Kwasi Kwarteng, the first Tory cabinet member of African descent, looking after the face of business.

If this isn’t diversity, I don’t know what is. There are, of course, other incredibly talented and diverse parliamentarians, including long-standing champion Shailesh Vara, Nus Ghani, Claire Coutinho, and Gagan Mahindra, who remain an inspiration to us all.

This isn’t just token diversity. It shows that we are finally respected and trusted by the wider community to represent the United Kingdom nationally and on the international stage.

This diversity is reflected across public life too. We have Bina Mehta as KPMG’s first UK chair. Then there is Tushar Morzaria – like me, a fellow refugee from Uganda, who is group finance director of Barclays and recently a non-executive director at BP.

Others include Nikhil Rathi, the chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Oscar nominee and award-winning actor Riz Ahmed, and Nikita Kanani, medical director of NHS England.

British Asians are making their mark across all sectors of society. Nus Ghani’s claims last week were particularly alarming, as they threatened the incredible progress we have made in championing diversity.

All allegations should be investigated. I salute anyone who stands up against prejudice, but intolerance cannot be fought with more intolerance.

While it is important to investigate any complaints, unfortunately, it often comes down to one person’s word against another. What is needed is a wideranging dialogue encompassing the parliamentary party.

However, in addressing prejudice, it is important the debate isn’t hijacked and used as a political football from either side of the argument. Not only does it weaken our ability to stamp out prejudice, but it also leads to more division.

While there may be more work to do in addressing prejudice, we should never forget the tremendous improvement we have made in society over the last 40 years to get to where we are today.

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less