Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Devas Multimedia hires Jay Newman to fight the Indian government

Devas Multimedia hires Jay Newman to fight the Indian government

AN Indian satellite and telecoms company has hired a former US hedge fund executive to fight against the Indian government in connection with $1.3 billion arbitration ruling, The Financial Times reported.

Jay Newman, 69, who led Elliott Management’s 15-year battle to force the Argentine government to pay out on its defaulted debt, has been hired by a group of shareholders of Devas Multimedia, which includes Columbia Capital and Telcom Ventures as well as Deutsche Telekom, the report added.


According to the Financial Times report, Devas was awarded about $1.3bn in arbitration rulings after a contract with state-owned firm Antrix to develop broadband, was cancelled a decade ago. Interest on the amount owed is accumulating at about $350,000 per day.

India has refused to pay, alleging the original competition for the contract was mired in fraud and has launched legal proceedings to shut down Devas, the report added.

Following the campaign by Newman in Argentina, the country agreed to settle the $2.4bn dispute in 2016 in one of the greatest hedge fund trades.

"India is trying to “bully its way through” the dispute. It rivals the behaviour of Russia and Argentina combined," Newman was quoted as saying by The Financial Times. 

Scottish oil producer Cairn Energy has for months been trying to force the country to pay $1.2bn awarded by a tribunal in a stand-off over tax, echoing earlier disputes with telecoms group Vodafone and French drugmaker Sanofi.

There was a breakthrough in August when New Delhi moved to scrap the retrospective tax that had ensnared Cairn Energy and Vodafone, paving the way for a $1bn refund to Cairn.

According to Newman, the government’s decision to ditch the tax law did not affect Devas and that the group’s shareholders would continue legal fights.

He added that Devas is sizing up Indian government assets and it could try to seize them abroad.

In 2012, Elliott seized an Argentine naval vessel in Ghana, during a campaign that set new and controversial precedents for pursuing financial claims against sovereign states.

In June, Devas shareholders filed a lawsuit in the southern district of New York trying to establish that the state-owned airline Air India is “the alter ego” of India and therefore also liable, following a similar move by Cairn.

A judge in Seattle in August ordered Antrix to reveal details of its assets to Devas shareholders.

The dispute between Devas and New Delhi, which dates back to 2005, has included lawsuits in India, the US, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the UK and France and rulings by three arbitration panels, The Financial Times report added.

Devas agreed in 2005 to lease satellite spectrum from Antrix to develop a broadband network and to pay more than $300m, according to a Chennai court filing this year.

But in early 2011, after an investigation by India’s official auditor into the alleged underpricing of internet licences by the space ministry, state-owned Antrix cancelled the contract with Devas, citing force majeure.

Reports said that Devas already paid about $130m for the satellite spectrum. In 2015, the International Chamber of Commerce found Antrix had “unlawfully” annulled the contract and ordered it to pay $562m in damages plus $100m in pre-award interest. With additional interest running at 18 per cent a year, the award is worth about $1.2bn. Two further tribunals have also found in Devas’s favour, taking the total awarded to about $1.3bn.

However, in November the Indian Supreme Court halted the collection of the $1.2bn ICC award after the attorney-general said India had discovered “a serious fraud”.

Antrix filed a winding up petition against Devas earlier this year, claiming the award of the contract was “mired in fraud and corruption”, and in May India’s National Company Law Tribunal appointed a liquidator for Devas.

“It is surprising for Antrix as to how a stayed award is being attempted to be enforced by Devas across the globe,” Antrix told the Financial Times.

It said the original agreement that Devas entered into with then-officials of Antrix was “fraudulent”, adding that the company lacked the technical competence to fulfil their obligation.

More For You

UK retailers

For many retailers, this has meant closing stores, cutting jobs, and focusing on more profitable business segments

Getty

6 UK retailers facing major store closures in 2025

In 2025, several UK retailers are experiencing major store closures as they struggle to navigate financial pressures, rising operational costs, and changing consumer behaviours. These closures reflect the ongoing challenges faced by traditional brick-and-mortar stores in an increasingly digital world. While some closures are part of larger restructuring efforts, others have been driven by financial instability or market shifts that have forced retailers to rethink their business strategies. Let’s take a closer look at six major UK retailers affected by these trends.

1. Morrisons

Morrisons, one of the UK's largest supermarket chains, is undergoing a significant restructuring in 2025. The company has announced the closure of several in-store services, including 52 cafés, 18 Market Kitchens, 17 convenience stores, and various other departments. This move is part of a larger strategy to streamline operations and address rising costs. Morrisons’ parent company, CD&R, has been focusing on reducing overheads and refocusing on core services.

Keep ReadingShow less
Starmer Trump

The UK is seeking an agreement with the US to remove Trump’s 10 per cent general tariff on goods and the 25 per cent tariff on steel and cars.

Getty Images

Industry warns Starmer: Strike deal with US or face factory job losses

FACTORY owners could begin laying off workers within months unless prime minister Keir Starmer secures a trade agreement with US president Donald Trump, MPs have been told.

Make UK, an industry lobby group, told the business and trade select committee that tariffs on British exports were reducing demand for UK-manufactured goods.

Keep ReadingShow less
British Steel halts layoffs after government rescue plan

Chancellor Rachel Reeves in the rail and sections hot end rolling mill during her visit to the British Steel site on April 17, 2025 in Scunthorpe, England. (Photo by Danny Lawson - WPA Pool/Getty Images)

British Steel halts layoffs after government rescue plan

BRITISH STEEL announced on Tuesday (22) it has halted plans to lay off thousands of workers after the government secured the raw materials necessary to keep the country's last steelmaking blast furnaces running.

The future of the plant was thrown into jeopardy in March when its Chinese owners Jingye said it was no longer financially viable to keep the blast furnaces burning, putting 2,700 jobs at risk.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sainsbury’s

The decision to cut jobs at head office will likely have a significant impact on the workforce

Getty

Sainsbury’s to cut 3,000 jobs and close 3 in-store services

Sainsbury’s has announced plans to cut 3,000 jobs across its operations, along with the closure of three key in-store services. The UK supermarket giant confirmed that the closures will impact its larger stores, with the patisserie, hot food, and pizza counters set to shut down by early summer.

As part of the changes, the most popular items previously sold at these counters will be relocated to other sections of the stores, ensuring customers can still purchase these products despite the closure of the dedicated counters. Additionally, Sainsbury’s will introduce new ‘On The Go’ hubs by autumn, offering hot food options to meet customer demand for convenience.

Keep ReadingShow less
Unsafe ‘energy-saving’ plugs still sold online despite safety concerns

Warnings about similar devices have existed for over a decade

iStock

Unsafe ‘energy-saving’ plugs still sold online despite safety concerns

Plug-in devices marketed as “energy-saving” products are still being sold across online marketplaces in the UK, despite being illegal and failing basic safety tests, according to a new investigation by consumer group Which?.

The study found that several of these cheap devices, often called “eco plugs” or “energy-saving plugs”, not only failed to deliver any energy-saving benefits but also posed potential risks such as fire or electric shock. Some of the products, priced as low as £5, were tested and found to be unsafe for household use.

Keep ReadingShow less