Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Doctor faces inquiry for circumcising boy without adequate consent

The boy’s parents are separated. But his mother allegedly had signed two disclaimer forms, claiming she had sole parental responsibility

Doctor faces inquiry for circumcising boy without adequate consent

AN Asian-origin doctor based in Nottingham, who was previously suspended for circumcising a baby without his mother’s consent, will again face inquiry after he circumcised a boy without his father’s agreement.

The General Medical Council (GMC) will launch a new inquiry into the procedure carried out by Balvinder Mehat, of the Bakersfield Medical Centre in Nottingham, BBC reports.


In the latest case, the boy - who was seven at the time - was circumcised on October 19, 2022, when his mother took him to the doctor.

The boy's parents are separated and his father was not aware. His mother allegedly had signed two disclaimer forms, claiming she had sole parental responsibility.

BBC reports that there is a mismatch between the date metioned in the disclaimer forms and the day circumcision was done.

His father got to know only when the boy went to stay with him during a half-term break, a few days after the procedure.

The boy experienced deep pain and was taken to the Royal Derby Hospital.

He had undergone Plastibell circumcision, where a plastic ring is inserted between the foreskin and the head of the penis.

Royal Derby Hospital carried out an emergency procedure to remove the Plastibell ring and also his foreskin as it had become infected.

The father approached the GMC, which had investigated but closed the complaint as there was no "realistic prospect of proving that Dr Mehat's fitness to practice was impaired".

When he sought a review, the GMC found that its earlier decision may have been flawed and decided to revisit the case.

Mehat has said he will cooperate with the review and claimed the procedure was carried out correctly after taking appropriate consent.

In the earlier case, Mehat was suspended for one month in 2019 after circumcising a baby boy in 2013 without his mother’s consent.

The child was taken to the hospital by his paternal grandmother without his mother being aware.

Mehat did not, however, lose his job as a medical practitioners tribunal decided that he was “no risk to patients”.

More For You

asylum seekers

Members of the public in the council meeting hold up signs during Cllr Amos's questions

Via LDRS

Worcester asylum seekers fleeing death penalty and religious persecution, charity reveals

Phil Wilkinson Jones

Highlights

  • Young men at Worcester hotel fled countries like Iran and Nigeria where homosexuality carries death penalty.
  • Summer protests outside Fownes Hotel left asylum seekers feeling "very vulnerable".
  • Charity challenges "harmful rhetoric" of labelling asylum seekers as "illegal immigrants".
Asylum seekers staying at a Worcester hotel are fleeing religious persecution and the death penalty for being gay in their home countries, a local charity has revealed.
Simon Cottingham, co-founder of Worcester City Welcomes Refugees, made the disclosure at Worcester City Council's full meeting on Tuesday.

Speaking about residents at the city's asylum seeker accommodation, Mr Cottingham said "A lot of young men who are in that hotel actually are fleeing because they are gay."

He explained that in countries like Iran and Nigeria, individuals face the death penalty for homosexuality, while others are persecuted for converting to Christianity or their political beliefs.

Keep ReadingShow less