In the neonatal intensive care department of an Islamabad hospital, scrawny infants struggle for survival -- victims of a vacuum in resources and education in the country with the highest newborn mortality rate in the world.
"In Pakistan, a baby dies every second minute," says Haider Shirazi, head of the neonatal department at the Pakistan Institute of Medical Science (PIMS), the largest health facility in the capital.
Newborns in the Muslim giant, with its rapidly growing population of 207 million inhabitants, face a one in 22 chance of dying in their first month, a UNICEF report released Tuesday showed.
That makes it worse than neighbouring war-torn Afghanistan, as well as the Central African Republic and eight other sub-Saharan African countries, which are often unstable and struggle with desperate poverty.
At the other end of the scale, Japan, which has spent decades guaranteeing the conditions necessary to protect the lives of babies, only lost one infant out of 1,111, according to the UNICEF report.
The ranking is embarrassing for Pakistan. The country is proud of its economic growth rate and expanding middle class, but in the last ten years has spent just 0.5-0.8 percent of its GDP on healthcare.
"It's only a tenth of what WHO (the World Health Organization) requires," says Kennedy Ongwae, a Kenyan doctor working for UNICEF in Islamabad.
At PIMS, says Dr Shirazi, there are 15 ventilators for newborns -- but PIMS is not representative of hospitals in Pakistan.
"In a lot of other parts of the country, they don't (have such equipment). And when the babies are infected, they die...The health budget is so pathetically low that we can do nothing with it."
- Talking about sex -
Inadequate funding is just one of the challenges. Pakistan, a deeply conservative patriarchal Muslim country, also struggles with a complete absence of sex education, family planning, health education for mothers, and healthcare training.
As a result it has the highest birth rate in South Asia -- around three children per woman, according to the World Bank.
But malnutrition and ignorance coupled with little in the way of birth spacing, or allowing a woman's body to rest for at least 18 months between pregnancies, make many of the babies particularly fragile, says Dr Shireen Gul, head of the intensive care unit at PIMS.
"This baby weighs 1.1 kilograms, (this one) 1.4 kilograms, and 1.2 kilograms," she recites, indicating three tiny bodies, her voice almost drowned out by the beeps of incubators.
In the developed world, she says, neonatal units have one nurse to one or two babies. In Pakistan, it is one nurse to eight infants.
"Many babies here do not survive," sighs Aysha Siddiqa, a nurse, gently rubbing an inert infant.
Dr. Ongwae of UNICEF also points to inadequate training of what staff there are.
Pakistan saw a surge in mothers giving birth in medical facilities between 2001 and 2013, from 21 percent to 48 percent -- but neonatal deaths have not decreased as a result, he said.
That can be down to issues as basic as midwives who carry out several deliveries without washing their hands.
- 'Never a priority' -
It is unthinkable behaviour in Japan, which "has spent several decades to ensure the 'conditions necessary to protect lives of babies'", says Fumio Bessho, a professor of paediatrics and public health, in comments published on UNICEF's Japan website.
The success is due to medical technology, regional reforms, and "above all, to the presence of many medical workers who take great care of high-risk pregnancies and babies with various problems every day", he writes.
"(E)asy access to doctors and hospitals for everyone, including frequent health checks during pregnancy, contribute to a good result," agrees Yasuhide Nakamura, professor of global health at Konan Women's University in Kobe.
Nakamura also said education of new mothers played an important role.
"The existence of the 'mother and child health handbook' that almost all mothers in Japan receive when they get pregnant is worthy of special mention," he told AFP.
"As mothers read what doctors write in their handbook, their awareness towards health of their babies and themselves is probably greater" than those in other countries, Nakamura said.
At the local level "mother classes" are offered to women, and nurses come to their homes free of charge, adds Hideki Kiyoshima, professor of modern society studies at Kinki University.
The level of care makes for a jarring comparison with the chaos of Pakistan.
"Everything is very simple. We know what we must do and it's not expensive," says Dr Shirazi.
But the newborn mortality rate, he says, "was never a priority".
Speaking at a business event, she basically said her village roots made it harder.
Directly named SRK, calling him a Delhiite with a convent education.
Threw "brutal honesty" out there as her secret weapon.
You can already imagine the social media frenzy this kicked off.
It's the latest salvo in the whole insider-outsider war that never ends.
Well, she's done it again. Kangana Ranaut, now MP, just reframed the entire Bollywood struggle debate with one comparison. At a recent industry gathering in Delhi, she got to talking about her success. And then she brought up Shah Rukh Khan. Not with nostalgia. She positioned her own journey from a no-name Himachal village as the tougher path against his, what she termed, convent-educated Delhi background, and it obviously sparked reactions online.
Kangana says coming from a small village and being brutally honest shaped her journey in Bollywood Getty Images
So what did she actually say?
Her exact words: "Why did I get so much success?" she asked the room. Classic Kangana, starting with a question she's about to answer herself. "There is probably nobody else who came from a village and got such success in the mainstream. You talk about Shah Rukh Khan. They are from Delhi, convent-educated. I was from a village that nobody would have even heard of, Bhamla." And the punchline is that she believes it's her "brutal honesty" that did the trick.
Kangana calls brutal honesty her secret weapon in the film industryGetty Images
Let's talk about these two different worlds
Look at the facts. Kangana. Bhamla. Left at 15 for Mumbai, a kid with no roadmap. Her fight in the industry is well-documented, every step a battle she talks about. Four National Awards though, that's huge. Then Shah Rukh. Delhi. Lost his parents young, sure. But he cut his teeth on TV, became a name before he even hit films. His Mumbai move in '91 led to... well, to being King Khan. Both stories are about making it from nothing. But nothing means different things depending on your postcode, apparently.
Shah Rukh Khan’s Delhi upbringing gets compared to Kangana’s village struggleGetty Images
And the fallout?
It's a mess online, obviously. You have one side cheering her on for saying the quiet part out loud: that a village girl with no English has a steeper hill to climb than a guy from the capital. Then the other side is just exhausted. They're saying it's a cheap shot, that it diminishes Khan's own loss and grind. Does this debate even go anywhere? It just seems to recycle every few months. But people click. They always click.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.