Few films manage to be both a record-breaking success and a lightning rod for controversy at the same time. But L2: Empuraan, the much-hyped sequel to Lucifer, has done exactly that. The Prithviraj Sukumaran directorial, starring Mohanlal, has not only rewritten and shattered box office history but also sparked a nationwide debate on censorship, political narratives, and artistic freedom.
On one hand, it’s the fastest Malayalam film to gross £5.1 million (₹50 crore) in Kerala, the first Malayalam film to cross £10.2 million (₹100 crore) overseas, and a £20.4 million (₹200 crore) club entrant within just five days. On the other hand, it has been accused of pushing a political agenda, leading to 2m 8s, 24 last-minute cuts, a legal battle, and a full-blown culture war.
It stirred a wide range of opinions, with members of the right wing even accusing director Prithviraj Sukumaran of having connections to terrorist groups without any substantiated evidence. These unfounded accusations have unfortunately even extended to his wife, Supriya Menon, a respected journalist and producer, suggesting dubious affiliations without merit.
So, how did this explosive mix come about?
The political flashpoint: What sparked the controversy?
The controversy surrounding L2: Empuraan began after its first-day shows, due to scenes that many believed referenced the 2002 Gujarat riots. The film’s narrative was seen as focusing on the retaliation by Hindu mobs while failing to depict the Godhra train burning incident that triggered the violence. This led to the RSS-backed magazine Organiser calling out the film, first targeting Mohanlal, then shifting focus to director Prithviraj Sukumaran.
Union Minister Suresh Gopi dismissed the entire controversy as a “business stunt” to hype up the film, but the backlash was real. The film’s portrayal of the National Investigation Agency as corrupt, its depiction of central investigative agencies, and a reference to the Ministry of Defence further fuelled the fire. Today, a BJP leader from Thrissur has filed a petition in the Kerala High Court, demanding an immediate ban on the film to prevent communal unrest.
Adding another layer of intrigue, producers Antony Perumbavoor and Gokulam Gopalan are already under the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) scanner for alleged foreign funding violations. The petitioner accused the film of deliberately undermining the ED’s credibility.
Amid these tumultuous claims, the Kerala High Court has addressed the petition seeking to ban the film, ruling that the movie will continue its screenings as scheduled. The court’s decision, especially during such a crucial time, highlights the importance of artistic freedom and brings to light the broader need to protect creative expression from unwarranted censorship.24 cuts and a “voluntary” re-edit: The censorship debate
With pressure mounting, L2: Empuraan underwent a “voluntary” re-edit of 2 minutes and 8 seconds, initially reported to include 17 cuts but later increased to a total of 24.
- The villain’s name has been changed from Bejarangi to Baldev to avoid direct connections with Bajrang Dal or any real-life figures.
- Scenes of violence involving a pregnant woman have been removed.
- A sequence showing the assault of a woman has been cut.
- A vehicle displaying religious symbols has been edited out.
- Negative references to the NIA have been muted.
- Union Minister Suresh Gopi’s name has been removed from the “thank you” credits
Antony Perumbavoor in an interaction with the media today, clarified that these changes were a collective decision and not due to political pressure. However, the timing of the edits, coming only after the Organiser article and BJP backlash, certainly suggests otherwise.
- YouTubeyoutu.be
Mohanlal’s apology and Prithviraj’s mute reshare vs. Murali Gopi’s silence
As the heat intensified, Mohanlal took the safest route, a carefully worded apology. The superstar expressed regret over the film hurting sentiments, emphasising that it was never intentional. Director Prithviraj, with just a reshare of the apology, remained defiant. While the writer Murali Gopi wasn’t openly combative, his silence and refusal to issue a similar statement spoke volumes.
He took it a step further, throwing in a cryptic Eid wishes post on Facebook. Was this a way of calling out censorship without directly challenging it? Or was he simply done with the politics of it all?
Mohanlal's apology after the controversy Facebook Screengrab/Mohanlal
Box office juggernaut: Controversy didn’t stop the money flow
Despite the political firestorm, L2: Empuraan has smashed every possible record:
- Fastest Malayalam film to reach £5.1 million (₹50 crore) in Kerala.
- First Malayalam film to cross £10.2 million (₹100 crore) in overseas markets.
- Entered the £20.4 million (₹200 crore) club in just five days.
- Highest-grossing Malayalam film in the UAE and UK.
In fact, instead of trimming and destroying the film, the controversy may have actually fuelled ticket sales. With Empuraan becoming a talking point across India, even those who might not have been interested in a Malayalam political - action thriller lined up at theatres just to see what all the fuss was about.
The bigger picture: A dangerous precedent for Indian cinema?
At its core, the L2: Empuraan saga isn’t just about one film. It’s about who controls narratives in Indian cinema. The RSS and BJP’s pressure on the film raises serious questions about censorship. If even a box office behemoth with an industry legend like Mohanlal has to bow to edits, what does this mean for smaller, independent filmmakers?
Even more concerning is the legal attack on the producers, with allegations of foreign funding and anti-government agendas. Are we now entering an era where films that challenge certain narratives will not just face cuts but also legal repercussions?
Final thoughts: A film that defined the year or even the decade
Love it or hate it, L2: Empuraan has redefined the landscape of Malayalam cinema. It has proven that regional films can go global, both in earnings and impact. But it has also exposed the thin line between artistic freedom and political scrutiny.
For now, the re-edited version is expected to hit theatres tomorrow, continuing its historic run. However, the battle over cinema’s right to tell controversial stories is far from over. And if the past few weeks have shown us anything, it’s that L2: Empuraan has set a new benchmark and become a statement in its own right.
Rahul’s casual dismissal of that controversy has added fuel to the fire
Rahul Bhatt sparks controversy over 'insensitive' remarks about sisters Alia and Pooja Bhatt
Rahul Bhatt, fitness trainer and son of veteran filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt, has found himself at the centre of a social media storm following controversial remarks about his half-sister, Alia Bhatt. In a recent interview, Rahul drew comparisons between Alia and their older sister Pooja Bhatt, calling the latter more talented, attractive, and principled.
The comments, which many have labelled inappropriate and insensitive, have sparked widespread criticism online. During the interview, Rahul stated, “In my opinion, she (Alia) is not even half of what my real sister Pooja is. Not in talent, not in looks, not in terms of being sexy. In front of my sister, she is ‘paani kam chai’ (watery tea). Amongst the siblings, the most talented and the most moralistic is Pooja.”
Social media users reacted strongly, questioning why Rahul would compare his sisters in such personal terms. Several users were particularly disturbed by his reference to their appearance and sex appeal, pointing out that such comparisons within a family cross boundaries of propriety. One comment read, “This is disturbing. Why talk about your sisters like that? It’s not just weird, it’s wrong.” Another post said, “There’s nothing respectful about comparing your siblings’ attractiveness in public.”
The backlash also reignited conversation around a decades-old controversy involving Mahesh Bhatt and Pooja Bhatt. Rahul was asked about the infamous 1990s magazine cover where the father-daughter duo shared a kiss, which had stirred public outrage at the time. Dismissing the criticism, Rahul said, “It doesn’t make any difference. It’s like water off a duck’s back. We know the truth, and we’ve seen everything since childhood.”
Rahul’s casual dismissal of that controversy has added fuel to the fire, with critics saying it reflects a broader issue of the Bhatt family being insensitive to public perception and boundaries. Many users questioned the need for bringing up old incidents in a bid to defend new and equally questionable statements.
As of now, neither Alia Bhatt nor Pooja Bhatt has issued any public response to Rahul’s remarks. Both actors, known for their significant contributions to Indian cinema, have typically kept family matters private despite living in the public eye.
This episode has also sparked debate over the role of public figures in maintaining respect when discussing family matters in the media. Observers say such comments, especially when involving women’s appearance and personal qualities, reinforce problematic attitudes and fuel unnecessary controversies.
While Rahul Bhatt is not as prominent in the entertainment industry as his father or sisters, his comments have made headlines and placed the Bhatt family in the spotlight for reasons beyond their creative work. For many, this serves as a reminder that public platforms come with responsibility, and that family ties should not be trivialised or dissected for attention or comparison.
The backlash is unlikely to subside soon, especially as fans and followers of Alia and Pooja continue to express disappointment over the way the situation has unfolded. Whether or not Rahul chooses to clarify or apologise remains to be seen.