Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

'Forced adoption': what does the law say?

The UK parliament passed the Children Act 1989, which made the child’s welfare the paramount consideration.

'Forced adoption': what does the law say?

Thousands of parents in Britain have had their children removed and adopted without their consent since the turn of the century -- many more than in any of its European neighbours.

This is largely due to the UK legal system's focus on the well-being of the child, and the requirement only to convince a judge that a child may be at risk of future harm.


Here is the legal situation in England and Wales. Scotland, which has its separate legal system, is broadly similar.

Child's welfare 

Adoption was historically focused on meeting the needs of adults rather than children and it was not until 1976 that it became part of the wider child protection system, allowing courts to dispense with parental consent.

The UK parliament passed the Children Act 1989, which made the child's welfare the paramount consideration.

Judge Brenda Hale stated at the time that "there is no question of a parental right" while politician John Kerr explained it "is only as a contributor to the child's welfare that parenthood assumes any significance".

Threshold 

A child can only be removed from his or her family with the authorisation of the family court if it is satisfied that the child is "suffering, or is likely to suffer, significant harm" due to parental action.

Harm is defined as meaning "ill-treatment or the impairment of health or development, including, for example, impairment suffered from seeing or hearing the ill-treatment of another".

Hale stressed the state "does not and cannot take away the children of all the people who commit crimes, who abuse alcohol and drugs, who suffer from physical and mental illnesses or who espouse anti-social political or religious beliefs".

But campaigners complain that the rules are ultimately subjective and that the "crystal ball" method can lead to children being removed from mothers on the grounds that they have mental health issues or are victims of domestic abuse.

Adoption

A child may only be placed for adoption either with the parents' consent or where the court makes a "placement order", authorising the local authority to place a child for adoption.

If the parent has not consented to the placement, the court must be satisfied that parental consent should be dispensed with.

Once the child is the subject of a placement order, parental responsibility is given to the local authority.

After the placement order, the child will be placed with prospective adopters pending a final adoption order.

While it is possible to overturn an adoption order, in reality, it only occurs in highly exceptional circumstances.

Contact

When a child is in the care of the local authority, parents must be allowed reasonable contact with the child.

Once placed for adoption, any contact will be ended.

EU system 

The English adoption system has caused tension between the government and several European Union member states, in particular Latvia, Slovakia and Bulgaria.

Latvia's parliament formally complained to the House of Commons that children of Latvian descent were being adopted by British families, without parental consent.

In one case, the embassy of Bulgaria observed in a non-participatory capacity and suggested several options for the alternative care of a Bulgarian child, rather than her adoption in England.

And several hundred protesters gathered outside the British embassy in Bratislava in 2012 in protest over Slovak children adopted in Britain.

Every country in Europe has a mechanism for permitting adoption without parental consent, in certain circumstances, but "few –- if any –- States exercise this power to the extent to which the English courts do," according to an EU report on the issue.

(AFP)

More For You

Falklands sovereignty row erupts days before King Charles meets Trump

No 10 was quick to respond, with the prime minister's spokesman saying the government "could not be clearer" on its stance

Getty Images

Falklands sovereignty row erupts days before King Charles meets Trump

Highlights

  • A Pentagon email reported by Reuters suggested the US was considering reviewing its support for UK sovereignty over the Falklands.
  • Downing Street said sovereignty "rests with the UK" and the islanders' right to self-determination is "paramount".
  • Report emerged just three days before King Charles and Queen Camilla are due to meet Trump at the White House.
A report suggesting the US may be rethinking its position on the Falkland Islands has sparked a strong response from Downing Street, coming just days before King Charles and Queen Camilla head to Washington to meet president Donald Trump.
An internal Pentagon email, reported by Reuters, suggested the US was looking at ways to put pressure on Nato allies it felt had not supported its war in Iran.
One of the options discussed was a review of American backing for British sovereignty over the Falklands.
No 10 was quick to respond, with the prime minister's spokesman saying the government "could not be clearer" on its stance.
"Sovereignty rests with the UK and the islanders' right to self-determination is paramount," he told BBC, adding that this had been "expressed clearly and consistently to successive US administrations."
He was firm that "nothing is going to change that."
The Falkland Islands government backed London's position, saying it had "complete confidence" in the UK's commitment to defending its right to self-determination.
Previous US administrations have recognised Britain's administration of the islands but have stopped short of formally backing its sovereignty claim.

Political reaction grows

The report triggered sharp reactions from across British politics. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch called the reported US position "absolute nonsense", adding: "We need to make sure that we back the Falklands.

They are British territory." Reform UK's Nigel Farage said the matter was "utterly non-negotiable" and confirmed he would raise it with Argentina's president Javier Milei when they meet later this year.

Keep ReadingShow less