Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

'Give patients data choice'

Informed consent is vital when collecting medical records, says expert

ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2021, NHS Digital will collect General Practice data for Planning and Research (GPDPR) in England.


According to the NHS Digital website, the data will be used to “support a wide variety of research and analysis to help run and improve health and care services”. The data will also be used “to understand whether the health and care system as a whole is working for patients”.

In line with information governance policies, the data collected will both be pseudonymised and then encrypted before it leaves an individual’s GP practice. Data will only be shared with organisations who have a legal basis and meet strict criteria to use the information for local, regional and national planning, policy development, commissioning, public health and research purposes.

The data collection was delayed following public backlash and concerns1 raised by the British Medical Association (BMA) and the Royal College of GPs (RCGP). Even though the BMA and RCGP were “supportive of the principles of the new collection in promoting data sharing for appropriate purposes and centralising oversight and safeguarding”, they have formally expressed “concerns about the lack of communication with the public regarding the GPDPR programme”.

Originally, patients had until Wednesday (23) to opt out of sharing their private GP medical records, but given the backlash, it would seem that most were not even remotely aware of the plans. It is important to note that patients can still opt out of having their data share by registering via the Type 1 Opt-out2 or a National Data Opt-out3, or both.

The NHS Digital leadership rightfully highlighted the benefits that collecting this data can have on patient care4.

As health care is becoming more digitalised, the sharing of data is more important than ever before. Video calling clinicians and health care apps are no longer the future, but our present. Covid-19 has also accelerated the adoption of some of these new technologies and new ways of working.

There are many health conditions which disproportionately affect ethnic minorities, including coronary heart disease, diabetes, prostate cancer and Covid-19. Data collection for research and new technologies can help to reduce the inequalities seen in these and other conditions.

During a visit to an optician recently I also discovered that one of the eye scans took my age and ethnicity into consideration to make sure nothing relevant to me as a middle-aged black African man was missed. This was a reminder and example of how data can be used to provide better care for all.

While the NHS Race and Health Observatory (RHO) supports the principles and rationale behind the data collection, we initially had concerns around the proposals not being widely known or shared across inclusive platforms for diverse communities, including those who may need translations. In the run-up to the original proposed opt-out date, we became aware of details on the programme being shared via social media platforms.

Where there is a lack of awareness and information over public health messaging, this can lead to additional confusion if individuals are not aware or do not receive timely communications. The case of the failed Care.data plan eight years ago is a case in point. The public in general, and ethnic minorities in particular, need to be fully aware of the benefits of data collection; be informed of what options are available to opt out and given sufficient time to do further research and decide on their preference.

Even though the Covid-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected people from an ethnic minority background, the vaccine uptake among ethnic minorities remains significantly lower than that of people from a white background.

Research by Healthwatch exploring vaccination confidence among people from African, Bangladeshi, Caribbean and Pakistani backgrounds living in the UK found that “at the root of the problem are institutional mistrust and misinformation – and that is what the healthcare sector and policymakers need to address. Addressing mistrust and misinformation about NHS programmes could also help reduce health inequalities at a local level.”

Research by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine looking at factors influencing uptake of Covid vaccines found that “refusal is higher among health and social care workers who feel pressured by their employers”.

The NHS must show it has learned lessons from the vaccination programme and give people from ethnic minority backgrounds time to make informed decisions, instead of pressuring them. It will help to rebuild the trust that has been eroded by decades of unequal experiences and outcomes for people from an ethnic minority background. It is critical that people are not only informed through trusted channels, but also be given time to consent or decline to their medical information being shared. It is important that such a wide-ranging programme is accompanied by the right public-facing messages that are culturally sensitive and inclusive.

This is also an opportunity for the NHS as a whole to start addressing the issue of ethnicity coding in these data sets. The recently published research by the Nuffield Trust, in collaboration with the RHO, looked at ethnicity coding in English health service datasets. It found that there is still much more work to do to improve the quality of ethnicity coding in health care records5. Using incomplete or inaccurate data might have an adverse impact when trying to understand and reduce health inequalities.

The RHO is willing to work with all those involved in the patient data opt-out programme to develop appropriate information and to share it.

  • Owen Chinembir is senior implementation lead for the NHS RHO.

    References:

    1. www.rcgp.org.uk/-/media/Files/News/rcgp-bma-letter-gpdpr.ashx?la=en

    2. digital.nhs.uk/your-data/opting-out-of-data-sharing

    3. www.nhs.uk/your-nhs-data-matters/manage-your-choice/

    4. www.digitalhealth.net/2021/05/nhs-digital-announces-new-primary-care-data-collection-service/

    5. www.nhsrho.org/wp-content/ uploads/ 2021/06/Nuffield-Trust-Ethnicity-coding_WEB.pdf

  • More For You

    Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

    File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

    Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

    Dinesh Sharma

    THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

    We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

    Keep ReadingShow less
    Why this was the year of governing anxiously

    Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

    Why this was the year of governing anxiously

    THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

    Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    ‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
    Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

    ‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

    Dr Raj Persaud

    AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

    We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    ‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’
    Kanishka Narayan (centre) with fellow visiting British MPs, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma (left) and other officials

    ‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’

    Kanishka Narayan

    FOUR months since my election to parliament, I had the opportunity to join my parliamentary colleagues on a delegation to India, visiting Delhi and Jaipur for conversations with our Indian counterparts, business leaders and academics.

    I went to make the case for Indian investment in my constituency and across the UK.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    ‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’
    (From left) Professor Ted Cantle, Sunder Katwala, Sara Khan and John Denham at the event

    ‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’

    Sunder Katwala

    “SOCIAL cohesion is not the absence of riots.”

    John Denham put that central point pithily at the ‘After the Riots’ cohesion summit last week.

    Keep ReadingShow less