Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Give people a vote on expanding the Senedd’

Plan is a waste of taxpayer money, says Welsh Tory shadow minister

‘Give people a vote on expanding the Senedd’

HAVING been elected as the first woman of colour to the Welsh parliament in May 2021, I know there has been immense pressure on the Labour government to see more diversity in the Senedd.

Labour and Plaid Cymru are determined to squeeze more politicians into the Senedd, a contentious move which comes with a price tag of around £100 million – something I deem to be a huge waste of taxpayer money.


Their pipeline project – which the Welsh Conservatives are vehemently against – would see an additional 36 politicians in Cardiff Bay, taking the total to 96.

People up and down the country are being faced with ever-increasing cost-of-living pressures and the last thing they need right now is to be footing the bill for Labour and Plaid’s pet project.

Our NHS is under immense pressure, with 700,000 people languishing on treatment waiting lists. People are also struggling to get a doctor’s appointment or a check-up at the dentist.

I believe what Wales needs most is more doctors, nurses, dentists and teachers, not politicians.

Not only are Mark Drakeford and Adam Price looking to put more bums on seats, but they also want to impose a gender quota.

With the fear of sounding like a modern-day Martin Luther King, I have a dream to see the Welsh parliament be as diverse and inclusive as possible.

I am astounded that since its creation some 23 years ago, the Senedd has only seen four ethnic minority men and just one woman to date. I aspire to see a Senedd that has more women, more people of colour, more disabled politicians, and more members of the LGBTQ+ community.

LEAD Comment Natasha Asghar MS byline pic 2 Natasha Asghar

However, politicians should be elected on merit, not simply because they tick the right boxes, which is what I fear will happen under these plans.

I am proud of the fact that I am the first woman of colour to be elected to the Senedd, but I did not get here simply because of the colour of my skin.

I was democratically elected on my own merit by the people of South East Wales through equal competition.

In my view, there should be no gender balance. No all-women shortlist. No positive discrimination.

People across Wales who we, as politicians serve, deserve to know that Senedd members are in post because they are good at their job – not because they tick all the boxes to fulfil an artificial quota.

Over the past few weeks, I have been inundated with emails and calls from my constituents raising concerns and their objections to the Senedd expansion scheme.

They are clear in their views that the money should be spent on healthcare, education, infrastructure, and roads instead of extra politicians – and I wholeheartedly agree with them.

The proposed changes claim to strengthen the Welsh parliament and to better represent the people of Wales, but how can that be true when it is being forced upon them? As a general rule, nothing that has been imposed on the public without their consent has been successful.

My Welsh Conservative colleagues and I believe that Labour and Plaid should let the public have the final say on these plans.

Everyone talks about ‘living in a democracy’, so let’s see just how democratic the Welsh parliament and this Labour government are in reality.

If the Labour and Plaid coalition group – a term they absolutely despise – are so confident that this expansion scheme will be supported by residents in all four corners of the country, if they are so confident that the people of Wales are happy Natasha Asgharto see up to £100 million spent on more politicians; and if they are so confident these proposals will better serve the people of Wales and give them a stronger voice, then why not put it to the people?

Give them a referendum and let them voice for themselves whether they want more politicians in Cardiff Bay.

This is the people’s Senedd, so let the people decide on the future of Wales.

(The author is a member of the Senedd for South East Wales and Welsh Conservative shadow minister for transport and technology) 

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less