Governing after Truss is now the question

The risk to Sunak is that MPs choose to triangulate with a compromise candidate. Party members would probably like Boris Johnson back – but MPs have not forgotten why they dropped him. Sunak topped the ballot with MPs but lost to Truss among members. Defence Secretary Ben Wallace is universally respected in the party over his role on Ukraine, though lacks experience on the economy. Allies say he would stand as a “tax-cutting deficit hawk” whose top priority is the pledge to increase defence spending. The choices now are tougher than that.

Penny Mordaunt is now an experienced Kingmaker – having led King Charles III’s Accession Council with confident authority, That strong, stable and predictable Royal transition offers a sharp contrast to the Westminster shenanigans. Mordaunt backing Sunak or Wallace could prove decisive.

Sunder Katwala

Senior backbenchers, trying to engineer a consensus on a single candidate, have effectively reinvented the old “magic circle” method of choosing Tory leaders, before MPs began to cast votes from 1965. Former party chair Grant Shapps is now capturing every opinion on his fabled Excel spreadsheets. Many propose choosing a new leader without involving party members again – and without a General Election. There may be an election among MPs alone, if runners-up pledge to drop out. If Sunak emerged as the choice of Wesminster, asking members to ratify the choice in a ballot, within a month of his becoming Prime Minister, could be a risk worth taking.

The collapse of the government’s economic blueprint overshadowed new Home Secretary Suella Braverman speaking against government policy on many fronts, much to Downing Street’s frustration. She proposed leaving the European Convention on Human Rights, reviving Theresa May’s net migration target, making cannabis a Class-A drug, and ditching Truss’s plans for more temporary visas in agriculture, as well as Boris Johnson’s liberal approach to post-study visas. Careless talk hurts growth. Indian anger over Braverman’s tone on immigration has put the UK-India trade deal on hold. British Future’s latest research suggests the Braverman pitch is an ‘unpopular populism’, as attitudes to immigration have softened.

Braverman describing "her dream" of seeing headlines hailing a deportation flight to Rwanda was widely criticised. It was less noticed that Braveman’s point was that she does not expect this to happen: “if I’m honest, I think it will take longer,” she told the same interviewer. The view inside the Home Office is that the legal process means the Rwanda policy won’t now be operational unless the Conservatives get re-elected. The £120 million scheme is set to achieve nothing except headlines – diverting time, energy and money from workable reforms for an orderly, effective and humane asylum system.

An earthquake in the polls makes “what would Labour do?” an increasingly important question. Labour doesn’t often win elections, so its mantra is “no complacency”. It would be prudent for the Opposition to have a working assumption of a Lazarus-style Tory recovery, miraculously reversing the damage of the post-Truss earthquake. Everybody else now expects some form of Labour-led government by early 2025.

If the next Prime Minister ducks calls for a General Election, the two-year wait until voters next go to the polls will be a long time in politics. Debate within parties focuses primarily on how to get elected. The lesson of the failed Truss experiment is that how to govern in such volatile, cash-strapped times is the core challenge now.