Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

Hanging of 2012 rapists stirs women’s safety debate in India

By Amit Roy

AT 5.30AM (12am GMT) last Friday (20), four men – Mukesh Kumar Singh, 32; Akshay Kumar Singh, 30; Vinay Sharma, 26; and Pawan Gupta, 25 – were “hanged simulta­neously” in Tihar Jail in Delhi.


They were put to death for the gang rape on December 16, 2012, of a 23-year-old medical student who died of her extensive injuries a fort­night later in a Singapore hospital.

Afterwards, the bodies were kept hanging for half an hour as stipu­lated by the jail manual. Before go­ing to the gallows, Vinay and Muke­sh “had roti, dal, rice and sabzi for dinner and Akshay only tea in the evening”, an official revealed.

India hasn’t abolished the death penalty, but it is imposed only in the “rarest of rare” cases. This was con­sidered one, given the horrific way in which five men and a 17-year-old – the latter was released after three years while Ram Singh, 34, appar­ently committed suicide in prison – took it in turn to brutalise their vic­tim inside a moving bus before tossing out her bruised body along with her beaten male friend.

The victim was given the pseudo­nym Nirbhaya – “the fearless one”.

One commentator, Namita Bhandare, argued: “Indian law does not permit the naming of rape victims. Presumably this is because the crime of rape is so terrible that, in society’s eyes, it stains not the rapist, but his victim with shame; a shame so indelible that her honour and that of her family is irretrievably lost.

“The hangman’s noose was, de­spite the delays, an inevitable desti­nation for the four convicts. The question to ask now is what really changes for India’s women? That answer is depressingly brief. Noth­ing. But for now, to honour the one who died, we could begin by re­claiming her identity and calling her by her name.”

Surely, she has a point.

The BBC’s Gita Pandey pondered: “Has India become safer for women? A short answer to that question would be: No. And that’s because despite the increased scru­tiny of crimes against women since December 2012, similar violent in­cidents have continued to make headlines in India. And statistics tell only a part of the story – cam­paigners say thousands of rapes and cases of sexual assault are not even reported to the police.”

Punishment for sex crimes has been toughened in India, but ap­pear to have done nothing to re­duce attacks against women. Quite the reverse, in fact. The National Crime Records Bureau reports that 378,000 cases of crimes against women were recorded across India in 2018 compared to 359,000 in 2017 and 338,000 in 2016. Rape in 2018 totalled 33,356.

The executions were condemned by Amnesty International India as a “dark stain” on India’s human rights record, but were otherwise widely welcomed. The victim’s mother, Asha Devi, said: “Justice was de­layed but has been delivered finally. I hugged the photo of my daughter and said, ‘Today you got justice.’”

Prime minister Narendra Modi tweeted: “Justice has prevailed. It is of utmost importance to ensure dignity and safety of women.”

There were approving responses from many Bollywood personali­ties. For example, Preity Zinta said: “I wish it would have been faster but I’m happy it’s over. If Nirbhaya rapists were hung in 2012, the judi­cial system would have stopped so much crime against women. Fear of the law would have kept the lawless in check. Prevention is always bet­ter than cure.”

In Britain, the home secretary Priti Patel has been taken to task for remarks she made on the BBC’s Question Time in 2011, but in India, no one would have quibbled.

Patel had said: “I do actually think when we have a criminal jus­tice system that continuously fails in this country, and where we have seen murderers, rapists and people who have committed the most ab­horrent crimes in society, go into prison and then are released from prison to go out into the communi­ty to then re-offend and do the types of crime they have committed again and again. I think that’s ap­palling. And actually on that basis alone, I would actually support the reintroduction of capital punish­ment to serve as a deterrent.”

Recently, she insisted: “I have never said I’m an active supporter of it and (what I said) is constantly taken out of context.”

India is different. As soon as the jail authorities confirmed the hang­ings, many in the crowd outside began clapping and chanting Van­de mataram and Bharat Mata ki jai.

Although the death penalty was abolished in the UK in 1969, multi­ple or fatal gang rapes in this coun­try are relatively rare. They remain far too common in India, with no solution in sight.

More For You

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn

Getty Images

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

It is a truth universally acknowledged that voters are dissatisfied with the political choices on offer - so must they be in want of new parties too? A proliferation of start-ups showed how tricky political match-making can be. Zarah Sultana took Jeremy Corbyn by surprise by announcing they will co-lead a new left party. Two of Nigel Farage’s exes announced separate political initiatives to challenge Reform from its right, with the leader of London’s Conservatives lending her voice to Rupert Lowe’s revival of the politics of repatriation.

Corbyn and Sultana are from different generations. He had been an MP for a decade by the time she was born. For Sultana’s allies, this intergenerational element is a core case for the joint leadership. But the communications clash suggests friction ahead. After his allies could not persuade Sultana to retract her announcement, Corbyn welcomed her decision to leave Labour, saying ‘negotiations continue’ over the structure and leadership of a new party. It will seek to link MPs elected as pro-Gaza independents with other strands of the left outside Labour.

Keep ReadingShow less
Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less