Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Heard ‘absolutely not’ able to pay Depp $10.35 million in damages: lawyer

Depp sued Heard over an op-ed she wrote for The Washington Post in December 2018.

Heard ‘absolutely not’ able to pay Depp $10.35 million in damages: lawyer

Actress Amber Heard is unable to pay her ex-husband Johnny Depp more than $10 million in damages, her lawyer said Thursday after a US jury took the side of the “Pirates of the Caribbean” star in a bitter defamation trial.

The high-profile televised court battle ended Wednesday when a seven-person jury found that Depp and Heard had defamed each other, but weighed in far more strongly with Depp.


The jury, after a six-week trial featuring claims and counterclaims of domestic abuse, awarded him $10.35 million in damages, in contrast with $2 million awarded to Heard.

Asked on NBC's TODAY show if Heard will be able to pay up, her attorney Elaine Bredehoft said: "Oh no, absolutely not."

She added that the Aquaman star wants to appeal the verdict and "has some excellent grounds for it."

The 58-year-old Depp, who lost a libel case against the British tabloid The Sun in London in 2020 for calling him a “wife-beater,” celebrated the split verdict in the case as a victory while Heard said she was "heart-broken.”

Depp sued Heard over an op-ed she wrote for The Washington Post in December 2018 in which she described herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.”

The Texas-born Heard did not name Depp in the piece, but he sued her for implying he was a domestic abuser and sought $50 million in damages.

The 36-year-old Heard countersued for $100 million, saying she was defamed by statements made by Depp's lawyer, Adam Waldman, who told the Daily Mail her abuse claims were a "hoax."

Horrible message

Bredehoft said Depp's legal team worked to "demonize" Heard and suppressed crucial evidence in the trial, preventing the jurors from examining evidence of Depp's alleged abuse.

"A number of things were allowed in this court that should not have been allowed, and it caused the jury to be confused," she said.

"We had an enormous amount of evidence that was suppressed in this case that was in the UK case," she said. "In the UK case when it came in, Amber won, Mr. Depp lost."

The lawyer said the ruling bodes ill for the MeToo movement and will discourage women from reporting sexual harassment and abuse.

"It's a horrible message," Bredehoft said. "It's a significant setback, because that's exactly what it means.

"Unless you pull out your phone and you video your spouse or your significant other beating you, effectively you won't be believed."

Bredehoft was asked by TODAY about Heard's immediate reaction to the verdict in the trial, which took place in Fairfax County Circuit Court near the US capital.

"One of the first things she said is that, 'I am so sorry to all those women out there,'" she said. "This is a setback for all women in and outside the courtroom, and she feels the burden of that."

More For You

Kajol

Kajol shares her bold take on marriage during a lively segment with Twinkle Khanna

Instagram/kajol

Kajol says marriages should have an expiry date so ‘no one has to suffer too long’ on Two Much With Kajol and Twinkle

Highlights:

  • Kajol’s comment on marriage sparks laughter and debate on the show
  • Vicky Kaushal and Kriti Sanon join as guests for the latest episode
  • Twinkle Khanna disagrees, saying “It’s marriage, not a washing machine”
  • Kajol insists renewal option would stop people from “suffering too long”
  • Two Much With Kajol and Twinkle streaming now on Amazon Prime Video

Kajol has stirred up a fresh debate on Two Much With Kajol and Twinkle after saying marriage should come with an expiry date and a renewal option. The Kuch Kuch Hota Hai star shared her take during a lighthearted segment with Vicky Kaushal and Kriti Sanon, while Twinkle Khanna pushed back against the idea.

Kajol Kajol shares her bold take on marriage during a lively segment with Twinkle Khanna Instagram/kajol

Keep ReadingShow less