High Commissioner of India, H.E. Mr. Navtej Sarna presented his credentials to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom at the Buckingham Palace on 16 March 2016 at 1200 hrs. He was accompanied by his wife, Dr. Avina Sarna, the Deputy High Commissioner and senior officers of the High Commission.
High Commissioner Sarna is the 25th High Commissioner of India to the UK since 1947. He...
Investigators at the site of the Air India crash in Ahmedabad
INDIA’s Supreme Court said on Friday (7) that a preliminary report on the Air India crash that killed 260 people in June does not suggest any wrongdoing by the pilot-in-command, Captain Sumeet Sabharwal.
The court will hear a plea from the pilot’s father next week seeking an independent probe into the tragedy.
The petition was filed by 91-year-old Pushkar Raj Sabharwal, who asked for the investigation to be conducted by a panel of aviation experts headed by a retired Supreme Court judge.
His plea follows his public criticism of the government’s inquiry into the disaster, which he said had implied his son may have been at fault.
Justice Surya Kant, who heard the case on Friday, told the grieving father not to feel burdened by suggestions of blame.
“This crash was extremely unfortunate, but you should not carry this burden that your son is being blamed,” Justice Kant said. “No one in India believes it was the pilot’s fault. There’s no insinuation against the pilot in the preliminary report.”
The Supreme Court has issued notices to the central government, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), and the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). The matter will be taken up again on Monday (10). The Federation of Indian Pilots has also filed a separate petition seeking an independent inquiry.
The AAIB’s interim report, released in July, said the Dreamliner’s fuel control switches had almost simultaneously moved from “run” to “cutoff” shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad.
The engines flamed out, and although the switches were turned back on about 10 seconds later, it was too late to recover power. The plane crashed shortly afterwards, killing all 260 people on board.
The report recorded that one pilot asked the other why the fuel switches had been turned off, and the other denied doing so. The investigation has not ruled out a technical fault, and experts in aviation medicine and psychology are part of the ongoing probe.
Sabharwal’s lawyer, Gopal Shankaranarayan, argued that the AAIB investigation lacked independence and called for a judicial committee to examine the crash. “There’s a problem with Boeing aircraft all over the world,” he said, suggesting that a wider inquiry was needed.
During the hearing, the court dismissed concerns raised over a Wall Street Journal article that cited unnamed Indian officials. “We are not bothered by foreign reports,” Justice Kant said. “Your remedy should then be before a foreign court? It’s just nasty reporting.”
The government has described the AAIB probe as “very clean” and “very thorough.” Air India’s managing director and chief executive Campbell Wilson said last month that while the AAIB report found no fault with the airline’s operations, the company was reviewing its practices.
(with inputs from Reuters)
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
