Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

‘India steers global south while eyeing larger goals’

Delhi juggles alliances as country seeks influence on world stage

‘India steers global south while eyeing larger goals’

AS INDIA hosts its third Global South Summit on Saturday (17), just two days after its annual independence day celebrations, it is increasingly clear that the global south is recognised as a key foreign policy priority.

But, the definition of what constitutes the global south varies. It is not a geographical entity although it is at times perceived as such. It essentially refers to a group of ‘low or middle income’ countries as defined by the World Bank, geographically located in both the northern and southern hemispheres. It is also based on the group of ‘developing countries’, formerly constituting the Group of 77 (now 134) in the UN General Assembly.


While India belongs to the global south, it equally, is a major global economy with a global profile on the world stage, set to become the third largest economy in the world by 2029.

It provides aid, food, fuel, fertiliser and infrastructure projects to 78 countries; and, during Covid, supplied vaccines to 99 countries.

India sees itself as an influential voice of the global south, acting as a ‘facilitator’ between the major economies of the world and the global south. In this endeavour, it has held its first dedicated global south summit meeting in January 2023, titled ‘Unity of Voice, Unity of Purpose’, followed by the second in November 2023 titled ‘Together, for Everyone’s Growth, with Everyone’s Trust’, bringing together 125 countries.

The third, to be held on Saturday will be virtual. At the G-20 summit in New Delhi in September 2023, India also ensured that the African Union became a permanent member of the G20. India has held India-Africa summits in the past.

This is based on India’s policy of ‘issue-based alignment’ or ‘multialignment’ for a multipolar world order. This is an attempt to build meaningful ties on specific issues with different partners, short of an alliance relationship. At the same time, India is a member of the Quad grouping with the US, Australia and Japan.

The Quad is not a security organisation, but a broad partnership focusing on non-security issues, focusing on cooperation over the coronavirus pandemic, vaccine production, emerging technologies, space, cyber security and 5G deployment and diversification.

India faces several challenges as a facilitator between the global south and the powerful Western world. The first is whether such a facilitatory role be successful?

LEAD India Global South CREDIT ANI Photo Prime minister Narendra Modi virtually addresses the closing session of the secound summit

In a highly uncertain world, with simultaneous raging conflicts in Europe and the Middle East, and challenges in the Far East, the world is becoming highly polarised, amid a shift from a unipolar to a multipolar world.

India’s policy of ‘multi-alignment’ and ‘strategic autonomy’ are challenged. But, India’s policy towards the Russia-Ukraine war, where it has ‘not condemned nor condoned’ Russia’s invasion of Ukraine while abstaining in UN Security Council resolutions (when it was a permanent member) against Russia has brought it dividends, especially when a large number of the countries of the ‘global south’ do not want to be forced to choose sides on ongoing conflicts.

Second, the challenge from China. India’s tense relations with China follows on from their brutal Galwan border clash in the high Himalayas in the summer of 2020.

Despite multiple rounds of border talks between the two, dis-engagement of their border forces has not been completed, nor deescalation taken place.

With a far larger economy and international profile than India, China also sees itself as a leader of the global south.

In this context, China has deeper pockets and a larger global profile than India. But, in view of the intensifying rivalry between China and the US, it will not be possible for China to play a ‘facilitatory role’ between the western members of the G20 and the global south.

Although India and China are members of several multilateral organisations such as BRICS and the SCO, there is no intent or interest in collaborating bilaterally with each other in relation to their policies towards the global south.

LEAD India Global South Rahul Roy Chaudhury photo Rahul Roy-Chaudhury

Third, with India being a member of the global south but also set to become the third largest economy in the world, there will be inherent policy contradictions between the two; the challenge will be how best India can overcome them to the satisfaction of the global south.

India has long aspired to become a member of an expanded UN Security Council in a role commiserate with its greater economic power and international profile and influence. But, this endeavour may clash with its facilitatory role in relation to the global south,

Even as India is a member of the global south, its intent, policy, actions and implementation of projects in 68 countries worldwide place it as one of its leaders.

Its role as a ‘facilitator’ between the global south and the powerful western powers of the G20 is unique. This can continue to be enhanced through increased developmental partnerships focusing on key issues of concern, including food, fuel, financial and countering climate change, all of which India is involved in.

Yet, India’s leadership of the global south will continue to be contested by China in view of the tense relations between the two Asian giants.

(The author is the senior fellow for South Asia, The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), London)

More For You

UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less