Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Indian Actor Anupam Kher Has Key Role In New BBC Spy Drama

by Amit Roy


ACTING isn’t just acting. The Bollywood school of (over)acting, for example, requires very different skills from those required for the more understated style adopted in Britain.

But Anupam Kher, with 514 films, mostly Hindi, behind him, has made the successful transition from the former to the role of Shahbaz Karim in the new BBC drama, Mrs Wilson.

Ian Thomson, publicist for Snowed-In, the production company for the BBC show, explains why the 63-year-old Indian star was chosen for his 515th project: “Anupam Kher was picked because he is an absolute professional. We know his work.”

Kher has quite a few credits in British productions, often as a typical Indian father, Mr Bhamra in Bend Like Beckham and Mr Bakshi in Bride and Prejudice, both directed by Gurinder Chadha; and as Sathnam Sanghera’s father in the BBC adaptation of the author’s autobiographical tale of a Sikh boy growing up in racist Wolverhampton, The Boy with the Topknot.

Mrs Wilson, “inspired by real events”, is based on the life of British intelligence agent Alexander (Alec) Wilson, who had seven children with four wives but whose families did not know of each other until his death at the age of 70 in 1963.

During the 1930s, he worked for British intelligence in pre-partition India, serving as principal and professor of English at Islamia College in Lahore. He also wrote 28 well-reviewed novels, mostly spy thrillers, including The Crimson Dacoit.

Kher plays Wilson’s handler in Lahore in 1932. He turns up at the latter’s funeral in Britain more than 30 years later, telling his widow, Alison Wilson: “I wanted to pay my respects – (my name is) Shahbaz Karim. Alec was my best friend in India before the war.”

But he makes the mistake of addressing Alison (played by her actress granddaughter Ruth Wilson) as “Dorothy” – Dorothy Wick was, in fact, the English actress who Alec, a Catholic, had “married” in Lahore Cathedral.

Alison is confused enough as it is, because when Alec died of a heart attack, a woman had turned up claiming to be his wife, Gladys Wilson, which indeed she was. Alec’s three other marriages, including the last to Elizabeth Hill, a nurse whom he had met while working in a London hospital, were all bigamous. Perhaps Kher was urged to over emphasise an “Indian accent” in the drama – the BBC hasn’t quite worked out how to deal with the way English is spoken by Indians – but his character goes backwards and forwards in time.

The drama, which was shot mostly in Northern Ireland and has won rave reviews from critics, has cast Kher in a key role that is anything but stereotypical – an Indian in a position of authority in British intelligence in 1930s India, and then seen three decades later having a drink with chums in a gentlemen’s club in London.

I am sure Kher does not want to bite the hand that feeds him, but he does say: “For a long time in Indian films, you could make out a villain from one kilometre away. He would have the scar, he would smoke a cigarette, you knew the villain had entered the screen and something bad would happen.

He is glad the Shahbaz Karim role was challenging. “I come from a Hindi medium school; I think in my native language,” Kher points out.

“Whenever I do an English language film or series, it makes my job more difficult – which I love. Only when you have a difficult job you can give your best.

“My drama teacher used to say that when you are ‘competent’, you can never be brilliant. I have done so much work that competence comes naturally to me.

“When you do so many films back home, meet actors at parties or dinners, your body language become familiar to them.

“But Iain (Glen) or Keeley (Hawkes) or Ruth (Wilson) are strangers to me. The process of warming up to them is acting, according to me, because it looks real. That’s what I feel.

More For You

Baffling cabinet reshuffle

Piyush Goyal with Jonathan Reynolds at Chequers during the signing of the UK–India Free Trade Agreement in July

Baffling cabinet reshuffle

IN SIR KEIR STARMER’S cabinet reshuffle last week, triggered by the resignation of Angela Rayner, the prime minister shifted Jonathan Reynolds from business and trade secretary and president of the board of trade after barely a year in the post to chief whip, making him responsible for the party.

The move doesn’t make much sense. At Chequers, the UK-India Free Trade Agreement was signed by Reynolds, and the Indian commerce and industry minister, Piyush Goyal. They had clearly established a friendly working relationship.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

We are living faster than ever before

AMG

​Dilemmas of dating in a digital world

Shiveena Haque

Finding romance today feels like trying to align stars in a night sky that refuses to stay still

When was the last time you stumbled into a conversation that made your heart skip? Or exchanged a sweet beginning to a love story - organically, without the buffer of screens, swipes, or curated profiles? In 2025, those moments feel rarer, swallowed up by the quickening pace of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

Shabana Mahmood, US homeland security secretary Kristi Noem, Canada’s public safety minister Gary Anandasangaree, Australia’s home affairs minister Tony Burke and New Zealand’s attorney general Judith Collins at the Five Eyes security alliance summit on Monday (8)

Comment: Mahmood’s rise exposes Britain’s diversity paradox

PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer’s government is not working. That is the public verdict, one year in. So, he used his deputy Angela Rayner’s resignation to hit the reset button.

It signals a shift in his own theory of change. Starmer wanted his mission-led government to avoid frequent shuffles of his pack, so that ministers knew their briefs. Such a dramatic reshuffle shows that the prime minister has had enough of subject expertise for now, gambling instead that fresh eyes may bring bold new energy to intractable challenges on welfare and asylum.

Keep ReadingShow less
indian-soldiers-ww1-getty
Indian infantrymen on the march in France in October 1914 during World War I. (Photo: Getty Images)
Getty Images

Comment: We must not let anti-immigration anger erase south Asian soldiers who helped save Britain

This country should never forget what we all owe to those who won the second world war against fascism. So the 80th anniversary of VE Day and VJ Day this year have had a special poignancy in bringing to life how the historic events that most of us know from grainy black and white photographs or newsreel footage are still living memories for a dwindling few.

People do sometimes wonder if the meaning of these great historic events will fade in an increasingly diverse Britain. If we knew our history better, we would understand why that should not be the case.

For the armies that fought and won both world wars look more like the Britain of 2025 in their ethnic and faith mix than the Britain of 1945 or 1918. The South Asian soldiers were the largest volunteer army in history, yet ensuring that their enormous contribution is fully recognised in our national story remains an important work in progress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Spotting the signs of dementia

Priya Mulji with her father

Spotting the signs of dementia

How noticing the changes in my father taught me the importance of early action, patience, and love

I don’t understand people who don’t talk or see their parents often. Unless they have done something to ruin your lives or you had a traumatic childhood, there is no reason you shouldn’t be checking in with them at least every few days if you don’t live with them.

Keep ReadingShow less