Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Indian-American MPs oppose changes to US birthright citizenship

The order, signed on the first day of Trump’s second term, declares that children born in the United States to undocumented immigrants will no longer be considered citizens.

donald-trump-getty
US President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on January 20, 2025. (Photo: Getty Images)

INDIAN-AMERICAN lawmakers have expressed strong opposition to an executive order signed by US president Donald Trump on changes to birthright citizenship.

The order, signed on the first day of Trump’s second term, declares that children born in the United States to undocumented immigrants will no longer be considered citizens.


The policy also extends to children of some individuals in the country legally on temporary visas, including students and tourists.

The executive order argues that such children are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, and therefore not entitled to citizenship under the 14th Amendment.

The move has raised concerns among Indian-American leaders, given its potential impact on legal immigrants, including those on H-1B visas.

Congressman Ro Khanna criticised the policy, stating, “Trump's order removes birthright citizenship for children born in the US not just to undocumented parents but to 'lawful' immigrants who are temporarily on a student visa, H1B/H2B visa, or business visa. So much for the pretence that the Republicans are for legal immigration.”

The H-1B visa is widely used by technology companies to employ highly skilled workers from countries like India.

Indian professionals are among the largest beneficiaries of these visas, which are capped at 65,000 annually, with an additional 20,000 for individuals with advanced degrees from US institutions.

Indian-American Congressman Shri Thanedar said, “No matter what Donald Trump says or does, birthright citizenship has and will be the law of the land. I will fight to protect it at all costs.”

Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal described the order as unconstitutional, saying, “Plain and simple this is unconstitutional and cannot be done with the stroke of a pen. If enacted, it would make a mockery of our country's laws and the precedents set in the Constitution.”

Immigration rights groups and attorneys general from 22 states have challenged the order in court, arguing that it violates the 14th Amendment.

Two federal lawsuits have been filed, with one coalition seeking a temporary restraining order to block the policy from taking effect on February 19, 2025.

New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin called the move “a flagrant violation of our Constitution,” while California Attorney General Rob Bonta described it as “blatantly unconstitutional and un-American.”

Ajay Bhutoria, a Biden White House Commissioner, also condemned the executive order, stating, “This executive order is not only unconstitutional but also undermines the values of equality and justice that define America.”

He urged South Asian and immigrant communities to stand united against such policies.

(With inputs from PTI)

More For You

Gatwick’s second runway bid casts doubt on Heathrow expansion justifications

Sir Sadiq Khan

Gatwick’s second runway bid casts doubt on Heathrow expansion justifications

Noah Vickers

GATWICK Airport getting permission to operate a second runway would destroy Heathrow Airport’s arguments for needing an extra runway of their own, Sir Sadiq Khan suggested last Thursday.

The London mayor, who has said he is against any airport expansion due to the UK’s net zero carbon goals, said approval for a second Gatwick runway would represent a “slam dunk” against the rationale for expansion at Heathrow.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump-AI-Getty

Trump speaks flanked by Masayoshi Son (2R), chairman and CEO of SoftBank Group Corp, Larry Ellison (2L), executive charmain Oracle and Sam Altman (R), CEO of Open AI at the White House on January 21, 2025

£406 billion AI infrastructure plan announced by Trump

US PRESIDENT Donald Trump announced on Tuesday a private-sector investment of up to £406 billion to develop artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure, with the aim of positioning the United States as a leader in the technology.

The initiative, named "Stargate," involves a joint venture between OpenAI, SoftBank, and Oracle. Trump said the project would result in the construction of data centres and the creation of over 100,000 jobs in the US.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kumbh-AI-Getty

Organisers hope the technology will help prevent deadly stampedes, a recurring issue at large-scale religious events in the country. (Photo: Getty Images)

India turns to AI for crowd management at Kumbh Mela

INDIA is using artificial intelligence (AI) to improve crowd management at the Kumbh Mela, the world’s largest religious gathering, where millions of pilgrims gather for ritual bathing.

Organisers hope the technology will help prevent deadly stampedes, a recurring issue at large-scale religious events in the country.

Keep ReadingShow less
usha-vance-jd-trump-getty

Trump with JD Vance (C) and Usha Vance in Emancipation Hall at the US Capitol after being sworn in as the 47th president of the US. (Photo: Getty Images)

Trump praises Usha Vance, the first Indian-American Second Lady

US president Donald Trump remarked that Usha Chilukuri Vance, wife of Vice President JD Vance, could have been his vice president, joking, "she is smarter, but the line of succession didn’t work that way."

Usha, 39, made history on Monday as the first Indian-American and Hindu to serve as Second Lady after her husband was sworn in as the 50th vice president of the United States.

Keep ReadingShow less
India-Britain-iStock

The report highlights that in 1750, India accounted for 25 per cent of global industrial output, which declined to 2 per cent by 1900 due to British protectionist policies targeting Indian textiles. (Representational image: iStock)

Report claims colonial Britain drained India of £52.7 trillion

A REPORT by Oxfam International claims that between 1765 and 1900, £52.7 trillion was transferred from India to Britain during colonial rule.

Released during the World Economic Forum in Davos, the report, Takers Not Makers: The unjust poverty and unearned wealth of colonialism, asserts that the British Empire stifled India’s industrial growth and left the nation impoverished.

Keep ReadingShow less