Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Indian anger after Trump’s ‘filthy’ talk

By Amit Roy

WATCHING the US presidential debate last week in Nashville, Tennessee, I have to admit I was startled in the early hours of the morning when Donald Trump described India as a “filthy” country.


Whether he wins or loses in next Tuesday’s (3) election, I feel he has lost a number of friends in India, across the Indian diaspora – and, significantly, perhaps even among voters of Indian origin in the US.

To be fair to Trump, I need to put his words into context. His comments were made in relation to the emission commitments made by his predecessor under the Paris Climate Accord, and his decision to pull out from the agreement on the grounds that it was unfair towards the US.

Responding to a question on how he would combat climate change and support jobs growth, he claimed that “we have the best carbon emission numbers that we’ve had in 35 years under this administration. We are working so well with industry, but here’s what we can’t do – look at China, how filthy it is, look at Russia, look at India, it’s filthy, the air is filthy.”

Of course, everyone knows pollution levels in the Indian capital, New Delhi, are intolerable, and many other cities in the country are not much better.

In fact, the Mumbai-based writer, Kiran Manral, author of The Reluctant Detective, made a point of not being offended.

She tweeted that “air reaches levels of toxicity every single year” and added: “Instead of getting all insulted and upset, can we just take it up as a challenge to clean up our surroundings and our air? So, no one can ever dare say that again.”

Doctors and epidemiologists have also warned that toxic air will hamper India’s fight against Covid-19.

However, what many Indians took in was Trump’s unfortunate phrasing, “look at India, it’s filthy”. They will also resent being bracketed with China and Russia. These are not words that they would have expected to hear from someone who has enjoyed Indian hospitality and is meant to be good friends with the Indian prime minister Narendra Modi.

It didn’t help that Trump’s jibe came ahead of an official visit this week by Mike Pompeo and Mark Esper, the US secretaries of state and defence respectively. They arrived in New Delhi on Monday (26) to meet their Indian counterparts for the “US-India 2+2 ministerial” talks and to meet Modi.

Joe Biden, Trump’s Democratic challenger for the White House, rounded on the president for his alleged gaffe and voiced the sentiments of many Indians: “President Trump called India ‘filthy’. It’s not how you talk about friends – and it’s not how you solve global challenges like climate change.”

Referring to his vice-presidential candidate, Biden went on: “@Kamala Harris and I deeply value our partnership – and will put respect back at the center of our foreign policy.”

It will be recalled his “Howdy, Modi!” event in Houston in September 2019 was attended by nearly 50,000 people and hailed by Trump as a “profoundly historic event”.

And in February this year, Modi put on a grand “Namaste Trump” show, complete with songs, dances and a mega reception attended by 125,000 at the newly-built Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel cricket stadium in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.

In India, the Congress opposition sought to embarrass Modi.

Kapil Sibal, a senior Congress leader, taunted Modi: “Trump: Fruits of Friendship: Questions India’s Covid-19 death count. Says India sends dirt up into the air. India ‘air is filthy’. Called India ‘tariff king’. The result of ‘Howdy Modi’.”

Another Congress leader, Anand Sharma, added: “President Donald Trump has insulted ‘Namaste India’ and exposed his lack of knowledge on climate change and the Paris Agreement.

“A fact check would have told him that the US is the largest polluter historically and its per capita green-house gas emissions are six times India’s ‘filthy air’.”

If Trump loses, his words will be used against him to celebrate “the fall of a filthy president”.

But if he is returned to the White House, both sides will ignore his “India is filthy” comment.

More For You

Football with Faris: Arsenal see red after shocking dismissal

The Gunners have now been awarded the most red cards this season, and those decisions were fairly debatable as to whether they should’ve stood. (Photo: Getty Images)

Football with Faris: Arsenal see red after shocking dismissal

Faris Gohir

With the Premier League producing yet another controversial refereeing decision, it is about time the PGMOL are held accountable.

Bizarre red card dished out at Molineux

Keep ReadingShow less
Saif’s wife appeals for privacy as
identity of attacker sparks debate

File photograph of Saif Ali Khan in 2013

Saif’s wife appeals for privacy as identity of attacker sparks debate

AFTER the knife attack on actor Saif Ali Khan in his apartment in the early hours of last Thursday (16) in Mumbai, many people commented: “If celebrities can’t be safe, what about ordinary folk?”

They missed the irony of the remark. Bollywood stars, in particular, are meant to be like god, leading lives beyond the dreams of avarice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Guilty plea in Southport murders raises concerns about Prevent's reach

Southport murder suspect Axel Rudakubana appears via video link at the Westminster Magistrates' Court in London, Britain, October 30, 2024, in this courtroom sketch.

Courtesy of Julia Quenzler - Reuters

Comment: Guilty plea in Southport murders raises concerns about Prevent's reach

The guilty plea on the opening day of the Southport murder trial will save the parents of the three young girls who were murdered the ordeal of a full trial. It would have taken several weeks in court to prove in law the obvious, inescapable truth: that Axel Rudakubana had wielded the knife to commit these terrible crimes. Now a public inquiry must try to answer more difficult questions: why he did it, and how the murders could have been prevented.

When Rudakubana also was charged with terror offences - the possession of ricin and an Al-Qaeda manual - in October, it was widely assumed this confirmed an Islamist terrorist motive. With reporting restrictions lifted after the conviction, police and prosecutors have been unable to confirm that motive. They appear to believe the manual may have been in his possession more as a ‘how to’ guide to committing mayhem - along with much other material about school shootings and genocides - rather than reflecting specific sympathy to any cause.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Jaideep Ahlawat in Pataal Lok

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

LOVEYAPA DISASTER

PROMOTIONS for the forthcoming film Loveyapa got off to a disastrous start earlier this month with the release of its underwhelming title track Loveyapa Ho Gaya, accompanied by a bad music video and terrible trailer.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why Jenrick is right 
about abuse inquiry

Robert Jenrick

Why Jenrick is right about abuse inquiry

ROBERT JENRICK is a man who is likely to refer to a spade as “a murder weapon”.

Not everyone would use his robust language, but surely the shadow justice secretary is right in demanding a national inquiry into grooming gangs so British society can exclude people from “alien” cultures.

Keep ReadingShow less