Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

India’s Growing Soft Power: From Howdy Modi to Namaste Trump

By Dinesh Sharma

AS THE two leading democracies – US (oldest constitutional democracy) and India (largest constitutional democracy) – continue to tighten their embrace, prime minister Narendra Modi may be promoted to the “hugger-in-chief,” who was formerly known as the “chaiwallah.”

Chai has now become a specialty drink – you can find it at any Starbucks and in most local US restaurants. And as vegetarian food becomes part of the American diet, along with yoga and samosas, there seems to be a general acceptance of Hindus and Indian Americans as part of the American culture.


Most Americans on the street still may not know who Modi is. But most Indian Americans will know that Donald Trump embraced the Hindus with his avuncular phrase: “I love the Hindus!” or “Abki baar, Trump sarkar” on the Jimmy Kimmel show. These memes went viral during the 2016 election in the diaspora community.

Interestingly, this visit is timed to gain maximum advantage with the upcoming election, and garner votes from four million Indian Americans. Many Indian Americans have been promoted in the Trump administration. At the recent Diwali lighting ceremony at the White House, no fewer than 22 Indian American administrators were present. Trump called them “a very special people”.

The strategic partnership that began under Bill Clinton more than two decades ago has continued to expand and mature under George W Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump. The presidents may have changed, but the policy, with few ups and downs, has remained consistent. Progressive Indians with a global outlook generally have preferred democratic US presidents, with the history of the civil rights movement to back them up, while the business-oriented Indians have preferred the Republicans, who believe in open trade, free markets and unfettered growth.

There is an intensification of ties after the liberal reforms led by Manmohan Singh when he was finance minister; India undertook these reforms with the help of the US government. During the post-independence period from 1947 to 1991, which marked the onset of liberal reforms, only three US presidents had visited India, namely Dwight D Eisenhower (1959), Richard Nixon (1969) and Jimmy Carter (1978). Now, Indians have hosted visits from every US president starting with Bill Clinton (2000), George W Bush (2006), Barack Obama who visited twice (2010 and 2015), and Donald Trump (2020), whose daughter Ivanka had conducted her own official visit earlier.

As the headlines stated, US and India are natural allies and see themselves fighting terrorism, defending democracy and the rule of law. The long-wished for goal of the India-US partnership to triangulate China not only in the Asia-Pacific but around the world, may be slowly becoming a reality.

As Ashley Tellis has stated recently, “Yet three years into Trump’s presidency, the strategic partnership with India that successive US administrations have cultivated as a silent bulwark against China hasn’t just survived – it has flourished.”

Meanwhile, the business ties and people-people relations have continued to increase. Many big technology companies now boast Indian American CEO’s and middle managers. The triumvirate success of Microsoft, Google and IBM has given Indian American CEO’s a hat trick with Satya Nadella, Sunder Pichai and Arvind Krishna at the helm, respectively. This is a business success story, a case study that needs to be fully unpacked to understand the ‘secret sauce,’ but there is no doubt the geo-political relationship within the context globalisation has helped.

Similarly, Indian American politicians have had a good run this political season. While none of them have fully made it yet through to the primary or to the general elections, they have not been exactly taking it easy. From Kamala Harris, Raja Krishnamoorthi, Ami Berra, Pramila Jayapal, Preet Brahara, to Neal Katyal; all have been very active in the public sphere.

Standing on the shoulders of giants like Dalip Singh Saund, who was the first Asian American and first Sikh American elected to the US Congress in 1957 from Stockton, CA, the new wave of public figures have shown that India’s growing soft power is still instrumental in shaping the American dialogue for the next century.

In his biography titled, Congressman from India (1960), DS Saund wrote, “My guideposts were two of the most beloved men of history, Abraham Lincoln and Mahatma Gandhi. …I find comfort in the Declaration of Independence and hope for mankind in the great inalienable truths expressed in the Bill of Rights.”

In the cacophony of Indian American diaspora today, I can hear and relate to the echoes of DS Saund’s words and lived experience.

It is the soft power of the two democracies – examples of martyrs like Lincoln and Gandhi – that will shape not only the enduring values of the strategic partnership between India and the US, but also the future of the planet in the 21st century.

The author is Associate Professor at John Jay College, City University of New York, and Chief Research Officer at Steamworks.

More For You

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn

Getty Images

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

It is a truth universally acknowledged that voters are dissatisfied with the political choices on offer - so must they be in want of new parties too? A proliferation of start-ups showed how tricky political match-making can be. Zarah Sultana took Jeremy Corbyn by surprise by announcing they will co-lead a new left party. Two of Nigel Farage’s exes announced separate political initiatives to challenge Reform from its right, with the leader of London’s Conservatives lending her voice to Rupert Lowe’s revival of the politics of repatriation.

Corbyn and Sultana are from different generations. He had been an MP for a decade by the time she was born. For Sultana’s allies, this intergenerational element is a core case for the joint leadership. But the communications clash suggests friction ahead. After his allies could not persuade Sultana to retract her announcement, Corbyn welcomed her decision to leave Labour, saying ‘negotiations continue’ over the structure and leadership of a new party. It will seek to link MPs elected as pro-Gaza independents with other strands of the left outside Labour.

Keep ReadingShow less
Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less