Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘It is time to take a stand against online hate’

By Sanjay Bhandari

Chair, Kick It Out

SOCIAL MEDIA is just like the real world but on steroids.


Every action and emotion is compressed and exaggerated. It can be a place of immense joy, a crucial source of real-time news and a springboard for vital political change.

The Arab Spring, Clap for Carers, Black Lives Matter – all these are social movements that have been positive­ly accelerated by social media, while Sarah Cooper’s Trump imper­sonations, Michael Spicer’s Room Next Door and Andrew Cot­ter’s adventures with his labradors Olive and Mabel have kept us connected and enter­tained during the forced isolation of lockdown.

Of course, when so­cial media companies developed their prod­ucts, this would have been the kind of peace­ful idyll they envisaged.

But sadly, like hu­manity, social media has a dark side. Bully­ing, racism and hate is rife. Trolls have weap­onised social media and football, our na­tional religion, has be­come a battleground.

Football and social media can be a positive combined force: think of Marcus Rashford campaigning for free school meals. But social media is also a magnet for hate. Its relative an­onymity combined with fragmented law en­forcement creates a shelter for trolls and en­courages “pile-ons” where one abusive troll encourages others into a frothing spiral of hate.

Arsenal legend Ian Wright, Crystal Palace winger Wilfried Zaha and Sheffield United striker David McGol­drick have all been re­cent high-profile victims. In the cases of Wright and Zaha, the perpetra­tors were children.

In order to tackle on­line hate, everyone needs to do more.

First, we need better regulation and enforce­ment. Technology is massively under-regu­lated (compared to oth­er industries that im­pact our daily lives like banking, medicine, en­ergy, food). Recently, I met with the home sec­retary and was very en­couraged by her desire to drive real change. The online harms bill is potentially a game-changer. It would create a duty of care on social media companies and a regulator with power. If the bill is passed, the UK would be world leaders in social media regulation. We encour­age its adoption. But we will also need better connected law enforce­ment and prosecution processes as trolls are falling through the cracks. They need to be identified and punished.

Second, we need so­cial media companies to be part of the solu­tion. We cannot just de­monise them – this is a technology problem so we will need technology solutions. We need poli­cies that remove hate speech quickly. We need more content moderators to review complaints. We need more investment in ar­tificial intelligence to automate the suppres­sion of unlawful content. We need greater speed and transparency over the entire complaints process. We need loop­holes to be closed (such as the ability on Insta­gram to direct message any user). We need rapid provision of user infor­mation to law enforce­ment when investigating incidents (though we need to preserve the right to create anony­mous accounts as that may serve legitimate purposes – for example, if you are gay in a coun­try where homosexuali­ty is illegal, an anony­mous social media ac­count may be a vital link to support).

We need social me­dia companies to team up with us to create bet­ter understanding of the different kinds of troll­ing behaviour so we can create more targeted re­sponse strategies – how much of the hate is one-off? How much is com­mitted by children? How much is organised? If so, who are the members of those networks? What are their motivations?

Social media firms should also utilise their depth of resources to actively aid the wider battle against discrimi­nation by using their platforms to educate the public and to accel­erate the reporting of abuse. We have an on­going dialogue with so­cial media companies and they are already doing some of this work, but they need to do more. Increased reg­ulation would doubtless accelerate this work.

Finally, we all need to play our part as individ­uals and ‘Take A Stand’ against racism, discrim­ination and hate. We need a cultural reset. All of us fans and partici­pants need to exhibit zero tolerance. We need to become activists not bystanders. Our mantra should be ‘See It, Hear It, Report It’. Players should continue to play their part by using their platforms to keep the issue in the public eye. Governing bodies, clubs and charities like ours will continue to play our part by lobbying government and social media companies for meaningful change. We should also conduct our own independent social media monitoring and investigations to hold people accountable and create evidence trails to support prosecutions (as the Premier League has done for Neil Mau­pay of Brighton). Clubs and commercial spon­sors can exert further pressure by looking at how to stop funding hate on social media plat­forms by strategically withdrawing advertising.

Online hate is a com­plex cultural and social problem. There is no magic wand to wave away the problem. As on the football pitch, success will come from creativi­ty, hard work and, above all, teamwork.

More For You

Does likeability count more than brilliance?

Higher education participation is 50 per cent for British south Asian students

Does likeability count more than brilliance?

THE headline in the Daily Telegraph read: An 18-year-old with a higher IQ than Stephen Hawking has passed 23 A-levels.

The gushing piece went on to report that Mahnoor Cheema, whose family originate from Pakistan, had also received an unconditional offer from Oxford University to read medicine.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories
of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal on Mandalay Hill in Burma at the position once held by Sikh machine gunners who fought to liberate the area

Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal OBE VR

ACROSS the Asian subcontinent 80 years ago, the guns finally fell silent on August 15, the Second World War had truly ended.

Yet, in Britain, what became known as VJ Day often remains a distant afterthought, overshadowed by Victory in Europe against the Nazis, which is marked three months earlier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being

iStock

Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

Justice Rangajeeva Wimalasena

Judicial well-being has long been a taboo subject, despite the untold toll it has taken on judges who must grapple daily with the problems and traumas of others. Research shows that judicial stress is more pronounced among magistrates and trial judges, who routinely face intense caseloads and are exposed to distressing material. The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being. They ultimately affect the integrity of the institution and the quality of justice delivered. This is why judicial well-being requires serious recognition and priority.

As early as 1981, American clinical psychologist Isaiah M. Zimmerman presented one of the first and most comprehensive analyses of the impact of stress on judges. He identified a collection of stressors, including overwhelming caseloads, isolation, the pressure to maintain a strong public image, and the loneliness of the judicial role. He also highlighted deeply personal challenges such as midlife transitions, marital strain, and diminishing career satisfaction, all of which quietly but persistently erode judicial well-being.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fauja Singh

Fauja Singh

Getty Images

What Fauja Singh taught me

I met Fauja Singh twice, once when we hiked Snowdon and I was in awe he was wearing shoes, not trainers and walking like a pro, no fear, just smiling away. I was struggling to do the hike with trainers. I remember my mum saying “what an inspiration”. He was a very humble and kind human being. The second time I met him was when I was at an event, and again, he just had such a radiant energy about him. He’s one of a kind and I’m blessed to have met him.

He wasn’t just a runner. He was a symbol. A living contradiction to everything we’re taught about age, limits, and when to stop dreaming. And now that he’s gone, it feels like a light has gone out—not just in Punjab or east London, but in the hearts of everyone who saw a bit of themselves in his journey.

Keep ReadingShow less
“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

Minreet with her mother

“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

I was five years old when my parents first signed me up for a mini marathon. They were both keen runners and wanted me to follow in their footsteps. At the time, I hated it. Running felt like punishment — exhausting, uncomfortable, and something I never imagined I’d do by choice.

But one moment changed everything. I was 12, attending a gymnastics competition, and had gone to the car alone to grab my hula hoop. As I walked back, a group of men started shouting at me. They moved closer. I didn’t wait to hear what they had to say — I ran. Fast. My heart was pounding. It was the first time I felt afraid simply for existing in public as a young girl. I never told anyone. But I remember feeling thankful, strangely, that my parents had taught me how to run.

Keep ReadingShow less