Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘It is time to take a stand against online hate’

By Sanjay Bhandari

Chair, Kick It Out

SOCIAL MEDIA is just like the real world but on steroids.


Every action and emotion is compressed and exaggerated. It can be a place of immense joy, a crucial source of real-time news and a springboard for vital political change.

The Arab Spring, Clap for Carers, Black Lives Matter – all these are social movements that have been positive­ly accelerated by social media, while Sarah Cooper’s Trump imper­sonations, Michael Spicer’s Room Next Door and Andrew Cot­ter’s adventures with his labradors Olive and Mabel have kept us connected and enter­tained during the forced isolation of lockdown.

Of course, when so­cial media companies developed their prod­ucts, this would have been the kind of peace­ful idyll they envisaged.

But sadly, like hu­manity, social media has a dark side. Bully­ing, racism and hate is rife. Trolls have weap­onised social media and football, our na­tional religion, has be­come a battleground.

Football and social media can be a positive combined force: think of Marcus Rashford campaigning for free school meals. But social media is also a magnet for hate. Its relative an­onymity combined with fragmented law en­forcement creates a shelter for trolls and en­courages “pile-ons” where one abusive troll encourages others into a frothing spiral of hate.

Arsenal legend Ian Wright, Crystal Palace winger Wilfried Zaha and Sheffield United striker David McGol­drick have all been re­cent high-profile victims. In the cases of Wright and Zaha, the perpetra­tors were children.

In order to tackle on­line hate, everyone needs to do more.

First, we need better regulation and enforce­ment. Technology is massively under-regu­lated (compared to oth­er industries that im­pact our daily lives like banking, medicine, en­ergy, food). Recently, I met with the home sec­retary and was very en­couraged by her desire to drive real change. The online harms bill is potentially a game-changer. It would create a duty of care on social media companies and a regulator with power. If the bill is passed, the UK would be world leaders in social media regulation. We encour­age its adoption. But we will also need better connected law enforce­ment and prosecution processes as trolls are falling through the cracks. They need to be identified and punished.

Second, we need so­cial media companies to be part of the solu­tion. We cannot just de­monise them – this is a technology problem so we will need technology solutions. We need poli­cies that remove hate speech quickly. We need more content moderators to review complaints. We need more investment in ar­tificial intelligence to automate the suppres­sion of unlawful content. We need greater speed and transparency over the entire complaints process. We need loop­holes to be closed (such as the ability on Insta­gram to direct message any user). We need rapid provision of user infor­mation to law enforce­ment when investigating incidents (though we need to preserve the right to create anony­mous accounts as that may serve legitimate purposes – for example, if you are gay in a coun­try where homosexuali­ty is illegal, an anony­mous social media ac­count may be a vital link to support).

We need social me­dia companies to team up with us to create bet­ter understanding of the different kinds of troll­ing behaviour so we can create more targeted re­sponse strategies – how much of the hate is one-off? How much is com­mitted by children? How much is organised? If so, who are the members of those networks? What are their motivations?

Social media firms should also utilise their depth of resources to actively aid the wider battle against discrimi­nation by using their platforms to educate the public and to accel­erate the reporting of abuse. We have an on­going dialogue with so­cial media companies and they are already doing some of this work, but they need to do more. Increased reg­ulation would doubtless accelerate this work.

Finally, we all need to play our part as individ­uals and ‘Take A Stand’ against racism, discrim­ination and hate. We need a cultural reset. All of us fans and partici­pants need to exhibit zero tolerance. We need to become activists not bystanders. Our mantra should be ‘See It, Hear It, Report It’. Players should continue to play their part by using their platforms to keep the issue in the public eye. Governing bodies, clubs and charities like ours will continue to play our part by lobbying government and social media companies for meaningful change. We should also conduct our own independent social media monitoring and investigations to hold people accountable and create evidence trails to support prosecutions (as the Premier League has done for Neil Mau­pay of Brighton). Clubs and commercial spon­sors can exert further pressure by looking at how to stop funding hate on social media plat­forms by strategically withdrawing advertising.

Online hate is a com­plex cultural and social problem. There is no magic wand to wave away the problem. As on the football pitch, success will come from creativi­ty, hard work and, above all, teamwork.

More For You

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less