Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

‘Ethnic disparities in IVF success rate highlight access challenges’

Minorities delay fertility care amid social stigma and economic barriers

‘Ethnic disparities in IVF success rate highlight access challenges’
According to a recent report, IVF birth rate for Asian patients is 24 per cent, lagging behind 32 per cent for white patients

WITH nearly 30 years as an NHS consultant and as a British Asian woman, I am acutely aware of the unique challenges ethnic minority patients face in healthcare, especially on their journey towards parenthood.

This week, National Fertility Awareness Week shines a critical light on the psychological impact of infertility in minority ethnic communities. It is time to confront the barriers and stigmas contributing to inequalities in IVF access and outcomes for BAME patients, and the ways these amplify the mental challenges in what is often already a highly emotional and personal journey.


Recent data from the Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority (HFEA) revealed that black and Asian patients consistently experience the lowest birth rates in IVF treatment. Indeed, the average IVF birth rate using fresh embryo transfers among patients aged 18-37 was 24 per cent for Asian patients, compared to 32 per cent for white patients.

The disparities impacting BAME patients’ access to fertility treatments and their outcomes are multifaceted. Factors including pre-existing health conditions that can impact fertility, along with economic, social, cultural and structural factors – including persisting stigmas in some communities – all contribute to the obstacles that hinder open dialogue and equitable access to care.

It appears that at every step along the fertility treatment journey, women from ethnic minority communities face disparate challenges that can increase infertility related emotional distress. For example, Asian women tend to be more prone to polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), a condition that can lead to extended delays in treatment due to NHS waiting lists, subsequently prolonging referrals for IVF. Additionally, PCOS is often associated with a higher BMI, which can affect IVF eligibility and lead to further delays.

With the biological clock impacting fertility for both men and women, earlier diagnosis of underlying health conditions and accessible treatment can make the difference when it comes to a successful IVF outcome.

Compounding these issues, a 2021 HFEA report highlighted that 52 per cent of Asian couples seeking IVF had to rely on white donor eggs, as only four per cent of egg donors are of Asian descent. Many patients feel it is essential for the donor’s ethnicity to match their own, resulting in additional treatment delays and potentially poorer outcomes.

Economic factors also play a significant role. The Women’s Health Strategy highlighted disparities in NHS funding and provision of fertility treatment across England, with BAME communities relying more on NHS-funded treatment.

Geeta Nargund

Unfortunately, the NHS postcode lottery disproportionately impacts these groups, leading to delayed diagnoses for infertility-related conditions and hindered access to treatment. It is essential we tackle the NHS postcode lottery to improve accessibility of IVF, ensuring funding options are available for every individual who needs additional financial support so they can access the treatment they need.

Yet often one of the greatest factors increasing the mental toll amongst patients from ethnic minority communities facing fertility challenges is the enduring stigma that surrounds infertility and fertility treatments. I often hear from Asian patients and As-ian patient support groups that there is unfortunately still a stigma associated with infertility and fertility treatments. Sadly, many patients can feel isolated and unable to share their experience of treatment with their friends and family. It is essential that we raise awareness and tackle the taboos surrounding infertility.

There is still the common view that infertility is solely a ‘women’s issue’, which is entirely false – around half of all cases of infertility are due to a male factor. By educating Asian communities and raising awareness, we can help tackle taboos and make it easier for those suffering from fertility problems to have open conversations about their experiences, creating a supportive environment for them while they go through fertility treatments.

Ultimately, tackling these disparities requires a collaborative effort. We must raise awareness and understanding of fertility issues among ethnic minority communities, through community networks and patient support groups. We must also reduce NHS waiting lists for the initial diagnosis and treatment of pre-existing reproductive health conditions, alongside ending the NHS postcode lottery, which is resulting in disparities of access to funded IVF treatment across the country.

By opening up the conversation around infertility and addressing the stigmas that persist, we can level the playing field and improve both access and outcomes for BAME patients on their journeys towards parenthood.

Professor Geeta Nargund is the awardwinning medical director of abc ivf. She is also the medical director of CREATE Fertility, sister clinic, and a senior consultant gynaecologist and lead consultant for reproductive medicine services at St George’s Hospital, London.

More For You

UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less