by LAUREN CODLING
BRITISH prime minister Theresa May expressed regret for the Amritsar atrocity, but stopped short of a full apology on Wednesday (10).
“We deeply regret what happened and the suffering caused,” she said in the House of Commons at the start of Prime Minister's Questions, as India marks the 100th anniversary of the killings this weekend.
In response, Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the main opposition Labour Party, called for “a full, clear, and unequivocal apology”.
This weekend marks 100 years since British Indian Army troops, instructed by Brigadier General Reginald Dyer, fired upon Indians gathered at Jallianwala Bagh, killing hundreds of people and injuring many more.
The events of April 13, 1919, marked a turning point in India’s freedom struggle, and in the run-up to the centenary this week, there have been calls from prominent personalities both in India and the UK for an apology from Britain.
May's remarks come after a senior minister said the government should do more to acknowledge the brutality of Jallianwala Bagh.
On Tuesday (9), Mark Field addressed MPs in Westminster as they discussed an apology from the UK government on the centenary of the killing of hundreds of Indians by the British in Amritsar.
Field, minister for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), promised MPs in Westminster Hall that he would discuss the issue with prime minister Theresa May and the foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt.
He also told MPs that an “active debate” was taking place between senior ministers and the British high commissioner, Sir Dominic Asquith, in New Delhi, but did not elaborate.
Field said: “[The Amritsar massacre] was a shameful episode in our history and one we deeply regret to this day.
“I understand [our modern relationship] with India is framed by the past …I will take this to the foreign secretary and Downing Street [and relay the] sense that we do need to do a little more than the deep regrets that I have set out today.”
Although many politicians, including former prime minister David Cameron, have expressed
sympathy for the 1919 atrocity, an apology has not been offered.
Field confirmed that a representative from the British high commission in India would lay a
wreath at the Jallianwala Bagh Martyrs’ memorial on behalf of the UK government.
He added that the government was also “committed to ensuring what happened in Amritsar was never forgotten”.
Tuesday’s debate, which was sponsored by Conservative MP Bob Blackman, was attended by several politicians who all urged the British government to apologise for the horrific events of that day.
Speaking to Eastern Eye ahead of the debate, Blackman said he felt it was the right time for the government to apologise.
“After 100 years, although we should have done this beforehand, it is a good time to put our hands up and acknowledge such a terrible event and say sorry,” the Tory MP said.
Blackman, who visited the Jallianwala Bagh memorial site in 2016, called for British ministers to attend commemorate events in India to mark the milestone and also meet family members of those affected in the incident.
Describing the event as the “worst scandal in our relationship with India during the British administration”, Blackman said few people in the UK were aware of the massacre.
He admitted that he too was not fully aware of the tragedy before his visit. “[The lack of knowledge in the country] prompted me to seek a debate so we can get the government to do something,” the Harrow East MP, whose constituents include a large number of Indians, said.
Among MPs who spoke during the debate were Preet Gill, the first female British Sikh MP.
Speaking on behalf of the APPG (All Party Parliamentary Group) for British Sikhs, Gill said it was not enough to simply condemn the incident and express shame.
“The UK government should show respect to the worldwide Sikh community and have
the courage to give a full apology for the massacre,” the Labour MP from Birmingham said.
Fellow British-Asian MPs Virendra Sharma and Khalid Mahmood have also urged the government to apologise.
Labour MP for Brent North and shadow secretary for international trade, Barry Gardiner, said unless Britain acknowledged historic events, “we will be unable to learn from the errors we have made or to build a positive future with those we have harmed”.
“Time allows some wounds to heal, but others to fester. A century on from this most egregious and murderous act, an official government apology to the government and people of India is both appropriate and necessary,” Gardiner, who is also the chair of the Labour Friends of India, said.
Meanwhile, India’s federal minister Hardeep Singh Puri said some expression of regret by Britain would help bring closure over the atrocity.
Claiming that his maternal grandfather was present at the scene and was injured, Puri said
the shooting showed the “real character of British colonialism and the colonial rule”.
“Some expression of regret – I don’t know what form it takes,” he said. “But as a proud Sikh and as a very proud Indian, for anyone who has read about this tragedy, I think some expression of regret will help in getting closure.”
The Amritsar massacre, carried out under the command of Dyer, remains a source of tension between the UK and India. Pressure from campaigners and politicians has long been put on the UK government to acknowledge the actions of the British army in 1919.
Most recently, in February, a debate in the House of Lords asked the government if they
planned to issue an apology on the centenary.
Several peers, including Baroness Sandip Verma, Lord Meghnad Desai and Lord Karan Bilimoria, took part in the discussion.
An FCO spokesperson told Eastern Eye: “The government rightly condemned the incident at
the time – secretary of state for war Winston Churchill called it ‘a monstrous event… which stands in singular and sinister isolation’.”
They also noted that the Queen and Cameron had both previously expressed deep regret on visits to Jallianwala Bagh.
Cameron called the event as “a deeply shameful event in British history” when he visited in 2013.
According to a government source, although no official trip to India is planned for Hunt, he is
keen to visit the country.
FILE PHOTO: A general view shows British Steel's Scunthorpe plant, in Scunthorpe, northern England, Britain, March 31, 2025. REUTERS/Dominic Lipinski
The FBU is planning to introduce new internal policies and wants the TUC to take action as well. (Representational image: iStock)
FBU chief raises concern over rise in racist online posts by union members
THE FIRE Brigades Union (FBU) and other trade unions are increasingly concerned about a rise in racist and bigoted online comments by their own members and officials, according to Steve Wright, the FBU’s new general secretary, speaking to the Guardian.
Wright said internal inquiries have revealed dozens of cases involving members using racist slurs or stereotypes, often aimed at asylum seekers.
He said similar issues were reported in other unions, prompting a joint campaign to counter false narratives around immigration and race promoted by far-right groups online.
“People with far-right views are becoming more brazen in what they do on social media, and I’ve witnessed it with my own union around disciplinary cases and the rhetoric of some of our own members,” Wright said to the newspaper.
He added, “Some of our members and sometimes our reps have openly made comments which are racist and bigoted. In my time in the fire service, that has gone up.”
The FBU is planning to introduce new internal policies and wants the TUC to take action as well. A formal statement addressing far-right narratives will be launched at the union’s annual conference in Blackpool next month.
Wright cited the influence of social media and figures like Donald Trump and Nigel Farage as factors contributing to these incidents. “It feels like an itch that we’ve got to scratch,” he said.
The FBU barred a former official last year for allegedly endorsing racist content on X, including posts from Britain First and Tommy Robinson.
Wright also warned that the union could strike if the government moves to cut frontline fire services.