BRITISH prime minister Theresa May expressed regret for the Amritsar atrocity, but stopped short of a full apology on Wednesday (10).
“We deeply regret what happened and the suffering caused,” she said in the House of Commons at the start of Prime Minister's Questions, as India marks the 100th anniversary of the killings this weekend.
In response, Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the main opposition Labour Party, called for “a full, clear, and unequivocal apology”.
This weekend marks 100 years since British Indian Army troops, instructed by Brigadier General Reginald Dyer, fired upon Indians gathered at Jallianwala Bagh, killing hundreds of people and injuring many more.
The events of April 13, 1919, marked a turning point in India’s freedom struggle, and in the run-up to the centenary this week, there have been calls from prominent personalities both in India and the UK for an apology from Britain.
May's remarks come after a senior minister said the government should do more to acknowledge the brutality of Jallianwala Bagh.
On Tuesday (9), Mark Field addressed MPs in Westminster as they discussed an apology from the UK government on the centenary of the killing of hundreds of Indians by the British in Amritsar.
Field, minister for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), promised MPs in Westminster Hall that he would discuss the issue with prime minister Theresa May and the foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt.
He also told MPs that an “active debate” was taking place between senior ministers and the British high commissioner, Sir Dominic Asquith, in New Delhi, but did not elaborate.
Field said: “[The Amritsar massacre] was a shameful episode in our history and one we deeply regret to this day.
“I understand [our modern relationship] with India is framed by the past …I will take this to the foreign secretary and Downing Street [and relay the] sense that we do need to do a little more than the deep regrets that I have set out today.”
Although many politicians, including former prime minister David Cameron, have expressed
sympathy for the 1919 atrocity, an apology has not been offered.
Field confirmed that a representative from the British high commission in India would lay a
wreath at the Jallianwala Bagh Martyrs’ memorial on behalf of the UK government.
He added that the government was also “committed to ensuring what happened in Amritsar was never forgotten”.
Tuesday’s debate, which was sponsored by Conservative MP Bob Blackman, was attended by several politicians who all urged the British government to apologise for the horrific events of that day.
Speaking to Eastern Eye ahead of the debate, Blackman said he felt it was the right time for the government to apologise.
“After 100 years, although we should have done this beforehand, it is a good time to put our hands up and acknowledge such a terrible event and say sorry,” the Tory MP said.
Blackman, who visited the Jallianwala Bagh memorial site in 2016, called for British ministers to attend commemorate events in India to mark the milestone and also meet family members of those affected in the incident.
Describing the event as the “worst scandal in our relationship with India during the British administration”, Blackman said few people in the UK were aware of the massacre.
He admitted that he too was not fully aware of the tragedy before his visit. “[The lack of knowledge in the country] prompted me to seek a debate so we can get the government to do something,” the Harrow East MP, whose constituents include a large number of Indians, said.
Among MPs who spoke during the debate were Preet Gill, the first female British Sikh MP.
Speaking on behalf of the APPG (All Party Parliamentary Group) for British Sikhs, Gill said it was not enough to simply condemn the incident and express shame.
“The UK government should show respect to the worldwide Sikh community and have
the courage to give a full apology for the massacre,” the Labour MP from Birmingham said.
Fellow British-Asian MPs Virendra Sharma and Khalid Mahmood have also urged the government to apologise.
Labour MP for Brent North and shadow secretary for international trade, Barry Gardiner, said unless Britain acknowledged historic events, “we will be unable to learn from the errors we have made or to build a positive future with those we have harmed”.
“Time allows some wounds to heal, but others to fester. A century on from this most egregious and murderous act, an official government apology to the government and people of India is both appropriate and necessary,” Gardiner, who is also the chair of the Labour Friends of India, said.
Meanwhile, India’s federal minister Hardeep Singh Puri said some expression of regret by Britain would help bring closure over the atrocity.
Claiming that his maternal grandfather was present at the scene and was injured, Puri said
the shooting showed the “real character of British colonialism and the colonial rule”.
“Some expression of regret – I don’t know what form it takes,” he said. “But as a proud Sikh and as a very proud Indian, for anyone who has read about this tragedy, I think some expression of regret will help in getting closure.”
The Amritsar massacre, carried out under the command of Dyer, remains a source of tension between the UK and India. Pressure from campaigners and politicians has long been put on the UK government to acknowledge the actions of the British army in 1919.
Most recently, in February, a debate in the House of Lords asked the government if they
planned to issue an apology on the centenary.
Several peers, including Baroness Sandip Verma, Lord Meghnad Desai and Lord Karan Bilimoria, took part in the discussion.
An FCO spokesperson told Eastern Eye: “The government rightly condemned the incident at
the time – secretary of state for war Winston Churchill called it ‘a monstrous event… which stands in singular and sinister isolation’.”
They also noted that the Queen and Cameron had both previously expressed deep regret on visits to Jallianwala Bagh.
Cameron called the event as “a deeply shameful event in British history” when he visited in 2013.
According to a government source, although no official trip to India is planned for Hunt, he is
The Norwegian Nobel Committee said Machado was honoured for her efforts to promote democratic rights and pursue a peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy in Venezuela.
Maria Corina Machado awarded 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for promoting democracy in Venezuela
The Nobel Committee praised her courage and fight for peaceful democratic transition
Machado has been in hiding for a year after being barred from contesting Venezuela’s 2024 election
US President Donald Trump had also hoped to win this year’s Peace Prize
VENEZUELA’s opposition leader and democracy activist Maria Corina Machado has been awarded the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee said she was honoured for her efforts to promote democratic rights and pursue a peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy in Venezuela.
Machado, who has been living in hiding for the past year, was recognised “for her tireless work promoting democratic rights for the people of Venezuela and for her struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy,” said Jorgen Watne Frydnes, chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, in Oslo.
“I am in shock,” Machado said in a video message sent to AFP by her press team.
Frydnes said Venezuela has changed from a relatively democratic and prosperous country to “a brutal authoritarian state that is now suffering a humanitarian and economic crisis.”
“The violent machinery of the state is directed against the country's own citizens. Nearly eight million people have left the country,” he said.
The opposition has been systematically suppressed through “election rigging, legal prosecution and imprisonment,” Frydnes added.
Machado has been “a key, unifying figure in a political opposition that was once deeply divided,” the committee said. It described her as “one of the most extraordinary examples of civilian courage in Latin America in recent times.”
“Despite serious threats against her life, she has remained in the country, a choice that has inspired millions,” it said.
Machado had been the opposition’s presidential candidate ahead of Venezuela’s 2024 election, but her candidacy was blocked by the government. She then supported former diplomat Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia as her replacement.
Her Nobel win came as a surprise, as her name had not featured among those speculated to receive the award before Friday’s announcement.
Trump’s hopes for prize
US President Donald Trump had expressed his desire to win this year’s Peace Prize. Since returning to the White House in January for a second term, he has repeatedly said he “deserves” the Nobel for his role in resolving several conflicts — a claim observers have disputed.
Experts in Oslo had said before the announcement that Trump was unlikely to win, noting that his “America First” policies run counter to the principles outlined in Alfred Nobel’s 1895 will establishing the prize.
Frydnes said the Norwegian Nobel Committee is not influenced by lobbying campaigns.
“In the long history of the Nobel Peace Prize, I think this committee has seen every type of campaign, media attention,” he said. “We receive thousands and thousands of letters every year of people wanting to say, what for them, leads to peace.” “We base our decision only on the work and the will of Alfred Nobel,” he added.
Last year, the prize went to the Japanese anti-nuclear group Nihon Hidankyo, a grassroots organisation of atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The Nobel Peace Prize includes a gold medal, a diploma, and a cash award of $1.2 million. It will be presented at a ceremony in Oslo on December 10, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel’s death in 1896.
The Peace Prize is the only Nobel awarded in Oslo. Other Nobel Prizes are presented in Stockholm.
On Thursday, the Nobel Prize in Literature was awarded to Hungarian author Laszlo Krasznahorkai. The 2025 Nobel season concludes Monday with the announcement of the economics prize.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.