BRITISH prime minister Boris Johnson is believed to have told his Cabinet Office to inquire into the allegations of American firm Bain & Company’s involvement in the South African corruption scandal.
A South African inquiry commission, which in January indicted former president Jacob Zuma and the Indian-origin Gupta family for ‘state capture’, criticised Bain and other foreign firms for their roles in corruption.
During 2015-2021, Bain bagged 12 contracts worth £76.5 million from the UK government, with the Cabinet Office being the biggest contributor.
As Lord Hain of Neath took exception to the government’s association with the firm, Johnson wrote a letter to the peer, stating that he was “aware of the seriousness of the situation”.
“Corruption has the ability to erode trust and undermine public confidence and it should rightly be challenged,” the prime minister said in the letter reported by The Times.
Lord Hain, an anti-apartheid campaigner born to South African parents, told Johnson last month that awarding the UK’s public contracts to Bain amounted to endorsing the American company.
Criticising the government for allowing Bain to operate commercially in the UK, the peer sought an immediate freeze on all government contracts with the company.
Referring to the findings of the inquiry commission, he said the abilities of the South African Revenue Service (SARS) to collect tax and enforce compliance were “massively and systematically damaged during the Zuma administration, rendering it ineffective”.
“Shamefully, the commission found that this serious damage to SARS’s tax-raising capacity resulted directly from deliberate actions, including by a prominent global corporation operating in the UK, Bain & Company.”
However, Cabinet Office minister Stephen Barclay played down the UK’s government’s association with Bain, saying the firm was not its “strategic supplier”.
The company was not “currently undertaking any substantial work for the government”, the report quoted him as saying.
According to Tussell data cited by The Times, the Cabinet Office alone awarded four contracts worth £55 million to Bain between 2015 and 2021 for Brexit consulting.
Bain claimed it became an “unwitting participant” in a process that inflicted serious damage on SARS, “for which we apologise.”
It also said it had paid back the money it made from the SARS contract.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
More For You
Trump blames diversity policies for Washington air collision
Jan 31, 2025
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump on Thursday blamed diversity hiring policies for a mid-air collision between an airliner and a military helicopter over Washington’s Potomac River, which left 67 people dead.
Speaking at a press conference, Trump confirmed that all those aboard both aircraft had died and cited pilot error on the military helicopter as a factor in the crash. However, he focused on diversity policies under former presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama, claiming they prevented qualified employees from being hired at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
"I put safety first. Obama, Biden and the Democrats put policy first," Trump said. "They actually came out with a directive: 'too white.' And we want the people that are competent."
As Trump spoke, police divers searched for more bodies in the river.
The wreckage of the Bombardier jet, operated by an American Airlines subsidiary, remained partially above water, surrounded by emergency vessels. The jet had been carrying 64 people. The Black Hawk helicopter, with three soldiers on board, was also in the river.
"We are now at a point where we are switching from a rescue operation to a recovery operation," Washington Fire Chief John Donnelly said, confirming that 28 bodies had been found so far.
The crash took place late Wednesday evening as the airliner approached Reagan National Airport after a routine flight from Wichita, Kansas. It was the first major air accident in the US since 2009, when 49 people died in a crash near Buffalo, New York.
Reagan National is located near downtown Washington and the Pentagon, with heavy air traffic from both civilian and military aircraft.
Air traffic control audio recorded controllers repeatedly asking the helicopter if it had the passenger jet "in sight" before instructing it to "pass behind" the plane just before the collision.
At the press conference, Trump expressed sympathy for the victims before criticising diversity, equity, and inclusion policies.
He also singled out Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, saying, "He's run it right into the ground with his diversity."
Vice president JD Vance and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also spoke, claiming that diversity hiring practices had led to unqualified personnel in key positions. When asked by reporters whether he blamed diversity for the crash, Trump responded, "It could have been."
Rescue teams worked through the night in freezing conditions, searching for debris and bodies. Some wreckage was found a mile downriver.
Among the passengers were several US figure skaters and coaches, according to US Figure Skating. Russian officials confirmed that former world pairs champions Evgenia Shishkova and Vadim Naumov were also on board.
Air traffic controllers monitoring the situation at the time of the collision reported seeing a fireball before losing contact with the helicopter. "I just saw a fireball and it was gone," one controller was heard saying.
Transport officials said both aircraft were following standard flight paths under clear weather conditions.
Defence secretary Hegseth said the Black Hawk crew was conducting a routine night evaluation.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said, "Do I think this was preventable? Absolutely."
Trump also commented on the flight paths, saying the helicopter was "going at an angle that was unbelievably bad."
He referred to the air traffic controller’s final instructions, adding, "There was very little time left when that was stated," and blamed a "confluence of bad decisions."
Keep ReadingShow less
Crackdown on ‘fake news’ sparks dissent in Pakistan
Jan 31, 2025
PAKISTAN criminalised online disinformation on Tuesday (28), passing legislation dictating punishments of up to three years in jail and prompting journalist protests accusing the government of quashing dissent.
The law targets anyone who “intentionally disseminates” information online that they have “reason to believe to be false or fake and likely to cause or create a sense of fear, panic or disorder or unrest”.
It was rushed through the National Assembly with little warning last week before being approved by the Senate on Tuesday as reporters walked out of the gallery in protest.
Facebook, TikTok and WhatsApp are among the most popular social media platforms in Pakistan, where low digital literacy fuels the spread of false information, conspiracy theories and deepfakes.
Some YouTube journalists blur the line between reporting and heavily partisan commentary tailored to their millions of followers. Many lack fact-checking skills and contribute to spreading false information, garnering thousands of views.
“I am sure that in the future, the anarchy caused in society through social media will be controlled,” government minister Tanveer Hussain said as the bill was approved.
It will now be passed to the president to be rubber-stamped.
The new law says social media platforms must register with a newly established regulatory body, with non-compliance leading to temporary or permanent bans.
It also grants Pakistan’s intelligence agencies the authority to investigate disinformation and allows any citizen to file a case.
Senior journalist Asif Bashir Chaudhry, a member of the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists, said the government had assured reporters they would be consulted, but they were “betrayed and backstabbed”.
“We genuinely wanted a law against misinformation, but if it’s not being done through open discussion but rather through fear and coercion, we will challenge it on every available platform,” Chaudhry said.
“Even under dictatorships, legislation was not forcefully rammed through parliament the way this government is doing now.”
Pakistan media workers have reported rising state censorship in recent years and the public has shifted to consuming much of its news from social media.
“The mainstream media is already compromised. That’s the reason why many journalists turned to YouTube,” YouTube journalist Asad Ali Toor said in the capital Islamabad, where more than 150 journalists rallied against the bill.
“The state wants the same control of social media as it is controlling the mainstream media,” Toor said.
Around 50 journalists also protested the bill outside the press club of the southern city of Karachi on Tuesday afternoon.
Analysts said the government is struggling with legitimacy after elections last February plagued by rigging allegations, and with former prime minister Imran Khan jailed on corruption charges he insists are politically motivated.
Khan’s supporters and senior lieutenants in his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party have faced a crackdown, with thousands rounded up and Khan’s name censored from television.
Much of PTI’s campaigning has moved online where the party’s young tech-savvy base has continually called for protests.
PTI senator Syed Shibli Faraz called the new law “highly undemocratic” and said it would “fuel the political victimisation” of their supporters.
Digital rights activist Nighat Dad said there has been “one restrictive law after another, introduced under the guise of public interest or national security”.
The real intent is “consolidating power and controlling the narrative,” she said.
Social media site X was shut down in the wake of February’s election, as posts alleging vote tampering spread on the platform.
Pakistan is ranked 152 out of 180 countries in a press freedom index compiled by Reporters Without Borders.
At least 239 cases against journalists accused of spreading “fake news” have been recorded in south and southeast Asia since 2018, according to the Anti-Fake News Lawfare online database.
In Pakistan, even before the new legislation, journalists have faced arrest under terrorism legislation which civil rights monitors said is used as a cudgel on dissent.
Keep ReadingShow less
India shifts defence strategy while balancing western ties and Russian legacy
Jan 31, 2025
INDIA’S efforts to pare back its reliance on Russian military hardware are bearing fruit after the courting of new Western allies and a rapidly growing domestic arms industry, analysts said.
At a time when Moscow’s military-industrial complex is occupied with the ongoing war in Ukraine, India has made the modernisation of its armed forces a top priority.
That urgency has risen in tandem with tensions between the world’s most populous nation and its northern neighbour China, especially since a deadly 2020 clash between their troops.
“India’s perception of its security environment vis-a-vis China has been dramatically altered,” Harsh V Pant, of the New Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation think-tank, said.
Relations between the neighbours went into freefall after the clash on their shared frontier, which killed 20 Indian and at least four Chinese soldiers.
“It has sort of shaken the system and there’s a realisation that we have to do whatever is best now, and very fast,” Pant said of the incident.
India has become the world’s largest arms importer with purchases steadily rising to account for nearly 10 per cent of all imports globally in 2019-23, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said last year.
Workers clean communication equipment aboard INS Surat on January 11
More is in the pipeline, with orders worth tens of billions of dollars from the United States, France, Israel and Germany in coming years.
Modi will be in France next month where he is expected to sign deals worth about $10 billion (£8.03bn) for Rafale fighter jets and Scorpene-class submarines, Indian media reports say.
Defence minister Rajnath Singh has also promised at least $100bn (£80.3bn) in fresh domestic military hardware contracts by 2033 to spur local arms production.
“India has been traditionally an importer for decades and only switched to emphasising on indigenous manufacturing... in the last decade,” strategic affairs analyst Nitin Gokhale said.
“It is not easy to switch, not everything can be manufactured or produced here,” he said, saying the country lacked the ability to manufacture “highend technology” weapons systems.
But its efforts have still seen numerous impressive milestones.
This decade India has opened an expansive new helicopter factory, launched its first homemade aircraft carrier, and conducted a successful longrange hypersonic missile test. That in turn has fostered a growing arms export market which saw sales last year worth $2.63bn (£2.1bn) – still a tiny amount compared to established players, but a 30-fold increase in a decade.
India is expected in the coming weeks to announce a landmark deal to supply Indonesia’s military with supersonic cruise missiles in a deal worth nearly $450 million (£361.7m).
The government aims to treble this figure by 2029, with a significant chunk of the $75bn (£6.02bn) it spent on defence last year aimed at boosting local production and innovation.
India has deepened defence cooperation with Western countries in recent years, including in the much-feted Quad alliance with the United States, Japan and Australia.
This reorientation has helped India sign various deals to import and locally co-produce military drones, naval ships, fighter jets and other hardware with suppliers from Western countries.
It has also led to a precipitous drop in India’s share of arms from longstanding ally Russia, which supplied 76 per cent of its military imports in 2009- 2013, but only 36 per cent in 2019-2023, according to SIPRI data.
New Delhi has nonetheless sought to maintain the delicate balance between India’s historically warm ties with Moscow while courting closer partnerships with Western nations.
Modi’s government has resisted pressure from Washington and elsewhere to explicitly condemn Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, instead urging both sides to the negotiating table.
Gokhale said India was not in the position to abandon its relationship with Russia, which still plays an important role as a supplier of advanced weaponry including cruise missiles and nuclear submarine technology.
“India has certainly spread its risks by sourcing from other countries,” he said. “But Russia remains a very important and dependable partner.”
Keep ReadingShow less
India's Uttarakhand implements common civil code
Jan 30, 2025
THE INDIAN state of Uttarakhand has begun implementing a common civil code to replace religious laws, a move that has raised concerns among minority Muslims about a possible nationwide rollout by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
Indian prime minister Narendra Modi’s BJP has long advocated for a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) to standardise laws on marriage, divorce, and inheritance across India. On Monday, Uttarakhand became the second Indian state to enact such a law.
Goa, which had a common civil code from its time as a Portuguese colony, was previously the only Indian state with such a system.
Supporters argue that the UCC ensures equal rights for Muslim women by ending polygamy, setting equal property inheritance rights for sons and daughters, and requiring divorce cases to be settled in civil courts. The law also mandates registration of live-in heterosexual relationships, with non-compliance leading to a fine or up to three months in jail.
Uttarakhand state chief minister Pushkar Singh Dhami said the law promotes "equality." Speaking at a press conference, he stated, "This code is not against any sect or religion. Through this, a way has been found to get rid of evil practices in society."
The BJP has pushed for a nationwide common civil code, but the proposal has drawn opposition, particularly from Muslim groups who see it as an infringement on religious freedoms.
Opposition and concerns
Muslim leaders say the UCC interferes with Islamic laws on marriage, divorce, and inheritance.
"This is an attack on our identity," Asma Zehra, president of the All India Muslim Women Association, told AFP.
She said the law would create "huge challenges" for Muslim women by causing conflicts between state laws and religious practices.
"This law is totally biased against Muslims and is a manifestation of Islamophobia," she added.
Some critics have also raised concerns about provisions requiring live-in relationships to be registered.
"It is absolutely contrary to the right to privacy and personal autonomy," senior lawyer Geeta Luthra told AFP. She said the state should not interfere in consensual personal relationships.
The Uttarakhand assembly passed the UCC bill in February last year.
(With inputs from AFP)
Keep ReadingShow less
Yunus dismisses Bangladesh’s growth boom as ‘false narrative’
Jan 30, 2025
BANGLADESH’S interim leader, Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, said last Thursday (23) that the country's high growth under ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina was “fake” and criticised the world for failing to question her alleged corruption.
Yunus, 84, an economist and 2006 Nobel Peace Prize winner, assumed leadership of the south Asian country’s interim government in August after Hasina fled to India following weeks of violent protests.
Hasina was previously credited with turning around the economy and the country’s massive garments industry during her 15 years in power, although critics accused her of human rights violations and suppressing free speech and dissent.
Hasina, who led Bangladesh since 2009, is being investigated there on suspicion of crimes against humanity, genocide, murder, corruption and money laundering and Dhaka has asked New Delhi to extradite her.
Hasina and her party deny wrongdoing, while New Delhi has not responded to the extradition request.
“She was in Davos telling everybody how to run a country. Nobody questioned that,” Yunus told Reuters in an interview on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in the Swiss Alpine resort. “That’s not a good world system at all.”
“The whole world is responsible for making that happen. So that’s a good lesson for the world,” he said. “She said, our growth rate surpasses everybody else. Fake growth rate, completely.”
Yunus did not elaborate on why he thought that growth was fake, but went on to stress the importance of broadbased and inclusive growth, and the need to reduce wealth inequality.
Annual growth in the country of 170 million people accelerated to nearly eight per cent in the financial year 2017-2018, compared with about five per cent when Hasina took over in 2009, before the impact of Covid-19 and the war in Ukraine pulled it down.
In 2023, the World Bank described Bangladesh as one of the world’s fastestgrowing economies.
“Since its independence in 1971, Bangladesh has transformed from one of the poorest countries to achieving lowermiddle income status in 2015,” it said.
The student-led movement in Bangladesh grew out of protests against quotas in government jobs that spiralled in July, provoking a violent crackdown that drew global criticism, although Hasina’s government denied using excessive force.
The protesters recommended Yunus as the chief adviser in the interim government tasked with holding fresh elections.
Yunus, who has promised to hold elections by the end of 2025 or early 2026, said he was not interested in running.
Known as the “banker to the poor”, Yunus and the Grameen Bank he founded won the Nobel for helping lift millions from poverty with tiny loans of fewer than $100 (£80.4) offered to the rural poor, too poor to gain attention from traditional banks.
“I’m not driven by growth rates,” Yunus said. “I’m driven by the quality of life of the people at the bottom level. So I would rather bring an economy which avoids the whole idea of wealth concentration.”
Ties between Bangladesh and India, who have strong trade and cultural links, have become fraught since Hasina was ousted and she took refuge in New Delhi.
Yunus has demanded that India send Hasina back to Bangladesh so she can face trial for what it says are crimes against protesters and her opponents, and crimes she is accused of committing during her tenure.
Calling China a long-term friend of Bangladesh at this difficult time, Yunus said the strained relationship with New Delhi “hurts me a lot personally”.
“Bangladesh India ties should be the strongest. You know, you cannot draw the map of India without drawing the map of Bangladesh,” he said, referring to the fact that his country’s land border runs almost entirely alongside India’s.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More
© Copyright 2025 Garavi Gujarat Publications Ltd & Asian Media Group USA Inc