Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Kamal Pankhania: "It's appropriate that the Chancellor lower the personal allowance threshold"

The leading entrepreneur reacts to the autumn statement by Jeremy Hunt

Kamal Pankhania: "It's appropriate that the Chancellor lower the personal allowance threshold"

IT'S no secret that these are difficult economic times for people around the country, and indeed across the world.

Many of us are feeling the pinch as the war in Ukraine and its impacts on energy markets drive up inflation and the cost of living. The government’s response of supporting peoples’ energy bills is the correct one. However, such measures come at a price to the exchequer.


Faced with rising interest rates pushing up the cost of government borrowing and a ‘black hole’ in public spending, Jeremy Hunt had the difficult task of trying to square the circle and close the fiscal hole. Last week (17), the Chancellor announced a set of tax rises and real-terms spending cuts that will impact all of us.

Although freezing the personal allowance threshold will be difficult for many on lower incomes, it is appropriate that Hunt lower the threshold at which people start paying the top rate of income tax from £150k to £125k. As the Chancellor said in the chamber, he is “asking more from those who have more”, helping to ensure that those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest load, whilst everybody in society contributes to supporting the UK’s recovery through this difficult economic time.

It is important that the Chancellor and the Prime Minister showed that the poorest will be supported by this budget. Increasing pensions and benefits in line with our extremely high levels of inflation, and raising the benefits cap, will be a vital relief to many of the poorest families who have been struggling.

Kamal No.10 Picture Copy 1 Kamal Pankhania

Further investment in schools and hospitals was also welcome news. As a country, it is our duty to make sure that we can look after our sick and educate our children. The Chancellor’s plans to invest in the UK and to pledge £600bn in capital spending are also welcome. It is crucial for Britain’s future prosperity that our infrastructure and built environment are leading the world in their sophistication and development.

I was particularly pleased to hear the Chancellor’s pledge to spend billions on retrofitting buildings to make them more energy efficient. Lowering the carbon footprint of the built environment is crucial to supporting the UK’s energy independence, and in dramatically cutting families’ heating bills.

The Chancellor could have gone much further on housing, however. People need homes, and we are currently in the midst of a national housing shortage. Housebuilders need more incentivisation and support. Raising stamp duty after 2025 will inhibit new developments as fewer people will be able to afford to buy new homes.

The government should also invest in reforming and expanding its planning system. The Chancellor spoke of wanting to turn the UK into the next Silicon Valley. Introducing smart digital technologies and advanced AI processes could help dramatically increase the speed at which local authorities are able to resolve planning applications. Lengthy waiting periods serve to discourage housebuilding, ensuring that housing supply cannot keep up with demand and ever-growing numbers of people find it difficult to find safe, secure and affordable housing.

Planning reform to enable the private sector to stimulate the economy by the government stepping out of business’ way is a simple, low-cost way to get Britain building. The Treasury does not need to pay to reform the planning system, and such measures will help allow developers like Westcombe Group to stimulate growth through our projects.

By increasing the supply to address the housing shortage, more people will be able to move into affordable homes. This is something we’re encouraging with our housing association the Dholak Partnership, which provides affordable lettings for key workers, through which we are targeting over 500 people in the next five years. The more people that are able to move into such affordable housing, the less the government may need to spend on housing benefits. More homes are good for the people of Britain, and good for the government.

The Chancellor announced last week that the UK is in a recession, and it is clear that we are facing a difficult fiscal situation. He showed that the government understands the scale of the challenge, but that it is committed to supporting the most vulnerable as it enacts the necessary policies to help Britain recover. I wish him the best of luck.

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less