RELUCTANCE TO CHANGE STATUS QUO AND COVERT BIAS ARE HOLDING BAME LAWYERS BACK
by S NEERAJ KRISHNA
BLACK, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) lawyers are significantly under-represented in mid- to-large-size firms (those with six or more partners), a recent survey found.
Larger firms, with at least 50 partners, had the lowest proportion of BAME partners, at eight per cent, with no progress since 2017, the study revealed.
Analysis by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA) also showed that a majority of BAME lawyers did criminal work or private legal aid.
Firms handling more “lucrative” clients, such as in corporate law, had the lowest BAME representation at 15 per cent.
Sailesh Mehta, a Red Lion Chambers barrister and a former head of the Society of Asian Lawyers, told Eastern Eye: “In every sector – whether banking, medicine or law – there are the lucrative parts and the less well-paid parts. Criminal law pays far less than corporate law.
“Historically, BAME communities start in the less-rewarding areas, because the barriers to entry in those areas are a little lower than for the well-rewarded areas.”
The SRA report, which was published last month, noted thay there was “very little difference by seniority among BAME lawyers – 21 per cent of solicitors are BAME (down by one per cent since 2017), compared to 22 per cent of partners (up by one per cent since 2017)”.
Lawyers from an ethnic background made up 21 per cent of the legal staff at law firms in 2019, a figure that has remained stagnant since 2017, the report on diversity in the legal profession showed.
About 15 per cent of lawyers were Asian (up six per cent since 2014) when compared with seven per cent of UK’s overall workforce.
Mehta noted that progression among BAME lawyers had “always been sluggish”.
The SRA report of 2017 had, in fact, called for action to address diversity differentials in relation to progression to senior levels.
“This is where progress has been slowest, because the pushback has been greatest,” Mehta said.
While acknowledging that there has been “a change for the better”, he added, “Why must such changes be so slow?”
Change could “happen in an instant if there is the will. But, because the inequality is against BAME lawyers, change is at a snail’s pace, and we are expected to express gratitude for it,” Mehta added.
In his view, the process was slow because “an attack on the status quo would be an attack on vested economic interests”.
“Those who are at the top of the profession and highly paid would be most affected by changes to make the profession more equal,” he said.
Sundeep Bhatia, the proprietor of Beaumonde Law Practice, said: “It’s distressing that the same issues apply as they did 15 years ago”.
He said the key issue was not how many BAME men and women were entering law, but “the glass ceiling that keeps them out of senior positions”.
“They should be given the opportunity, and connections to break through that glass ceiling,” said Bhatia, a former chair of the Society of Asian Lawyers.
The SRA report, which analysed the relevance of “social mobility” in the placement of lawyers, noted that the larger firms had the highest proportion of lawyers who attended private school at 32 per cent.
Firms handling corporate law had the lowest proportion of state-educated lawyers at 46 per cent. On the other hand, 79 per cent of lawyers in firms handling mostly criminal work were state educated.
“Corporate firms tend to recruit from Oxbridge or Red Brick universities,” said Bhatia, a Law Society Council member for ethnic minority solicitors since 2010. “These universities have a disproportionate intake of private school pupils.”
Most BAME solicitors would have been educated at other universities that attract less corporate interest, he added. “The only way around this is for universities to look at and revise their selection criteria,” he explained.
Mehta agreed, adding that “BAME lawyers who went to state school face a double disadvantage – race and class”.
“Covert” prejudices still exist within the legal system on the whole, he said, citing a case where he represented a “very successful Nigerian businesswoman. While she was giving evidence, the elderly judge interrupted and said, ‘I just can’t understand your client’s English!’
“I responded: ‘Would your Honour mind changing your public-school accent to one that is easier for the jury and my client to understand?’
“The learned judge smiled wryly and did not complain again.”
Bhatia believed such an “unconscious bias” could be another reason for low BAME representation in large firms. “It may be a factor, with those in decision-making positions tending to recruit those who more closely reflect themselves,” he said. “More training needs to be given at law firms to negate this unconscious bias.”
It was also “disheartening” that BAME students did do not have enough role models, Bhatia added.
Solicitor Angeli Vadera of Keoghs Group shared this view, highlighting the “lack of role models” as a key challenge.
“It discourages BAME lawyers in law firms to progress,” she said.
“More needs to be done on promotion of lawyers through executive sponsor schemes and transparent promotion programmes that facilitate application from a range of the workforce.”
Vadera, who is part of the Law Society’s Ethnic Minority Lawyers Division Committee, advocated initiatives in which results could be measured and firms could work towards a set target, such as Lord Davies’ voluntary target of 33 per cent female representation for boards on the FTSE 350.
“Similar voluntary targets for racial equality will focus the attention of the law firms on changes which they need to make,” Vadera said. “The question as to how they will address this concern is still a massive issue, as it would require a change of culture within the firms.”
The SRA chief executive, Paul Philip, said: “A diverse and inclusive legal profession which reflects the wider community is not only good for the public but also for legal businesses themselves. That is why it is encouraging to see progress continuing across many areas, although there is clearly more work to be done.”
Demonstrators gather at the entrance of the parliament during a protest against corruption and government’s decision to block several social media platforms, in Kathmandu, Nepal September 8, 2025. (Photo: Reuters)
Thousands of young Nepalis march in Kathmandu against social media ban and corruption
Government blocks 26 unregistered platforms, citing fake news and fraud concerns
Police use tear gas, rubber bullets and water cannons to disperse protesters
Critics accuse government of authoritarianism and failure to deliver on promises
THOUSANDS of young Nepalis marched in Kathmandu on Monday demanding that the government lift its ban on social media platforms and address corruption.
Nepal blocked access to 26 unregistered platforms, including Facebook, YouTube, and X, on Friday. Popular platforms such as Instagram have millions of users in the country who rely on them for entertainment, news, and business. Authorities said the shutdown followed a Supreme Court order from September last year, which required companies to register in Nepal, appoint grievance officers, and establish local compliance.
The government said social media users with fake IDs had been spreading hate speech, fake news, and committing fraud. In a statement on Sunday, it said it respected freedom of thought and expression and was committed to "creating an environment for their protection and unfettered use".
Many demonstrators carried national flags and placards reading "Shut down corruption and not social media", "Unban social media", and "Youths against corruption". They began their rally with the national anthem before marching through the city.
"We were triggered by the social media ban but that is not the only reason we are gathered here," said student Yujan Rajbhandari, 24. "We are protesting against corruption that has been institutionalised in Nepal."
Another student, Ikshama Tumrok, 20, said she opposed the "authoritarian attitude" of the government. "We want to see change. Others have endured this, but it has to end with our generation," she said.
Protester Bhumika Bharati added: "There have been movements abroad against corruption and they (the government) are afraid that might happen here as well."
Since the ban, TikTok — still operational in Nepal — has carried viral videos comparing the lives of ordinary citizens with those of politicians’ children showing off luxury goods and vacations.
On Monday, thousands of youths, including students in school uniforms, tried to march to parliament but were stopped by police who had set up barbed wire barricades. Authorities said demonstrators attempted to break into parliament by pushing through police lines.
Police used tear gas, rubber bullets, water cannons and batons to disperse the crowds, officials said. "We have imposed a curfew which will remain in force until 10 pm local time (1615 GMT) to bring the situation under control after protesters began to turn violent," said Muktiram Rijal, spokesperson for the Kathmandu district office.
Nepal has restricted social media platforms before. The Telegram messaging app was blocked in July over fraud and money laundering concerns, and TikTok was banned for nine months before being restored in August last year when it complied with local rules.
Many Nepalis believe corruption is widespread, and prime minister KP Sharma Oli’s government has been criticised by opponents for failing to deliver on its promises. About 90 per cent of Nepal’s 30 million people use the internet.
The protests come as governments worldwide, including the US, EU, Brazil, India, China and Australia, have been tightening oversight of social media and Big Tech, citing concerns over misinformation, privacy, online harm and security. Critics warn that such measures risk limiting free expression, while regulators argue that stricter controls are needed.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
People try to board a migrant dinghy into the English Channel on August 25, 2025 in Gravelines, France. (Photo: Getty Images)
THE UK government said on Sunday it is examining the use of military sites to house migrants, amid growing criticism over the practice of accommodating asylum seekers in hotels.
"We are looking at the potential use of military and non-military use sites for temporary accommodation for the people who come across on these small boats," defence secretary John Healey told Sky News.
Home secretary Shabana Mahmood said in a statement that migrants using boats to cross the Channel from France was "utterly unacceptable".
According to figures published Sunday by the Home Office, more than 30,000 people have arrived in Britain by boat since the start of the year.
Mahmood also said a new deal with France, which came into effect in early August, would allow Britain to detain those arriving by boat and return them to France.
The arrangement requires Britain to accept an equal number of eligible migrants from France.
Some hotels currently used to house migrants have seen protests, and the government is also facing legal challenges. By law, asylum seekers must be provided with accommodation and access to health care.
Prime minister Keir Starmer has pledged to end the use of hotels within four years. The government has already reduced the number of hotel places by half compared to a year ago.
The previous Conservative government had already prepared two disused military bases to house several hundred asylum seekers, a measure criticised by migrant-aid groups.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
London Underground services will not resume before 8am on Friday September 12. (Photo: Getty Images)
First London Underground strike since March 2023 begins
RMT members stage five-day walkout after pay talks collapse
Union demands 32-hour week; TfL offers 3.4 per cent rise
Elizabeth line and Overground to run but face heavy demand
THE FIRST London Underground strike since March 2023 has begun, with a five-day walkout over pay and conditions.
Members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union are staging rolling strikes after nine months of negotiations failed.
The union has demanded a 32-hour week, while Transport for London (TfL) has offered a 3.4 per cent pay rise.
TfL said the offer was “fair” but added that a reduction from the contractual 35-hour week “is neither practical nor affordable,” BBC reported.
The strike runs from midnight on Sunday 7 September until 11.59pm on Thursday 11 September. London Underground services will not resume before 8am on Friday 12 September.
Nick Dent, director of customer operations at London Underground, said it was not too late to call off the strikes before disruption.
The Elizabeth line and London Overground will run as normal but are expected to be much busier. Buses and roads are also likely to see heavier demand.
A separate dispute will shut the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) on Tuesday 9 and Thursday 11 September.
Service plans include: limited Tube operations ending early on Sunday 7 September; little or no service on the Underground from Monday to Thursday; and full resumption by late morning on Friday 12 September. The Elizabeth line will not stop at Liverpool Street, Farringdon and Tottenham Court Road stations at certain times on 8–11 September, Sky News reported.
The last full Tube strike took place in March 2023.
Keep ReadingShow less
Mumbai Local has been stripped of its licence by Harrow council. (Photo: LDRS/Google Maps)
AN INDIAN restaurant in north London has lost its licence after it was found to have repeatedly employed illegal workers.
Harrow council determined that the evidence suggested that using illegal workers was a “systemic approach” to running the premises and it had a “lack of trust” in the business to comply with the law.
Harrow council’s Licensing Panel chose to strip Mumbai Local, an Indian restaurant on Streatfield Road, of its licence at a meeting on August 20, the outcome of which has now been made public.
The review came after Immigration Officers found people working there illegally on three separate visits dating back to 2023.
The panel found that the restaurant owner had “disregarded the law” on employing illegal workers on a number of occasions and it “had no trust” in them to remedy the situation.
An option to simply suspend the licence was considered but the panel concluded that it had “no confidence” in the licence holder’s ability to comply with their legal obligations and had “no choice” but to revoke it entirely.
The Home Office had called on Harrow council to review Mumbai Local’s licence due to a “continual pattern” of hiring illegal workers.
Immigration Officers told the panel that six illegal workers had been found at the restaurant following a visit on November 16, 2023, with a further two found during a follow up visit on July 4, 2024.
A compliance check was carried out on July 17, 2025, where a man who had previously been arrested was present on the premises, as well as another lady who told officers she would get the manager before disappearing.
On August 15, 2024, the company running the restaurant was given a £120,000 civil penalty for employing two people who did not have the right to work. This was reduced to £60,000 for employing one illegal worker following an appeal. A further appeal has been lodged but this remains ongoing.
The premises licence holder (PLH) “held their hands up” to the illegal workers being on the premises in November 2023, according to the meeting minutes, but claimed that the July 2024 incident “had more to it”. The PLH claims this worker came to the country having been sponsored by an IT company that went bust so he was out of work. They suggested the man is “like a son” to them and provided free food to him as he had nowhere to go and believes he “has a duty towards him”.
The PLH tried to suggest that the panel suspend the licence for just one month, claiming this would already “be crippling” to the business but the panel would “never see him again” as they had no other sanctions against them. However, under questioning the PLH admitted that there had been issues at another premises they own and they were forced to pay a £30,000 fine.
Ultimately, the panel didn’t feel the option of a suspension and additional conditions imposed on the licence “would be an appropriate remedy”. It determined that it “did not have the confidence in the PLH’s ability to comply with his legal obligations and had no option but to use their powers to revoke the licence.”
(Local Democracy Reporting Service)
Keep ReadingShow less
FILE PHOTO: US president Donald Trump meets with Indian prime minister Narendra Modi at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 13, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump said India and Russia seem to have been "lost" to China after their leaders met with Chinese president Xi Jinping this week, expressing his annoyance at New Delhi and Moscow as Beijing pushes a new world order.
"Looks like we've lost India and Russia to deepest, darkest, China. May they have a long and prosperous future together!" Trump wrote in a social media post accompanying a photo of the three leaders together at Xi's summit in China.
"I don't think we have," he said. "I've been very disappointed that India would be buying so much oil, as you know, from Russia. And I let them know that."
Asked about Trump's social media post, India's foreign ministry told reporters in New Delhi that it had no comment. The Chinese foreign ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment and representatives for the Kremlin could not be immediately reached.
Xi hosted more than 20 leaders of non-Western countries for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in the Chinese port city of Tianjin, including Russian president Vladimir Putin and Indian prime minister Narendra Modi.
Putin and Modi were seen holding hands at the summit as they walked toward Xi before all three men stood side by side.
"I'll always be friends with Modi," Trump told reporters. "He's a great prime minister. He's great. I'll always be friends, but I just don't like what he's doing at this particular moment. But India and the US have a special relationship. There's nothing to worry about. We just have moments on occasion."
"Deeply appreciate and fully reciprocate president Trump's sentiments and positive assessment of our ties," the Indian prime minister said in an X post early on Saturday (6).
India and the US have a "very positive ... forward-looking Comprehensive and Global Strategic Partnership," Modi said.
Trump has chilled US-India ties amid trade tensions and other disputes. Trump this week said he was "very disappointed" in Putin but not worried about growing Russia-China ties.
Trump has been frustrated at his inability to convince Russia and Ukraine to reach an end to their war, more than three years after Russian forces invaded Ukraine.
He told reporters on Thursday (4) night at the White House that he planned to talk to Putin soon.