Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Leicester lockdown reflects Covid threat

By Professor Kamlesh Khunti

AS IS now known, the burden of Covid-19 has not been equal, with people from ethnic minorities being at increased risk of infection, severe dis­ease and death compared to white populations.


At the University of Leicester, we were the first ones to raise concerns about a possible link be­tween ethnicity and Covid-19 outcomes in early April, following which we had confirmed reports from the intensive care unit audit and also when the first 10 doctors in the UK to die from coronavi­rus were identified as being from ethnic minorities. These concerns have now been confirmed from a number of studies in the UK and from the US, with some studies showing that a third of Covid-19 pa­tients admitted to intensive care units were from an ethnic minority background.

After my colleagues and I first raised this issue, we have spent the past five months working with national and international scientists on various is­sue related to Covid-19 and ethnicity. One interest­ing early study we were involved in was led by NHS England and examined data from 61 million people in the UK. We found that Asian and black individu­als were between 30 and 70 per cent more likely to die from Covid-19 compared to people of white ethnicity.

The question we began to focus on next was why were ethnic minorities disproportionally affected by this pandemic? We reviewed the scientific evi­dence in June as part of a report for the South Asian Health Foundation. The available data appears to point to three main contributory factors.

Existing social inequality has left ethnic minority communities at greater exposure to Covid-19 as they are more likely to be deprived, live in over­crowded housing with multiple generations, and work in high-exposure occupations, such as trans­port or health and social care.

In addition, south Asian and black populations are more likely to have pre-existing conditions such as diabetes, obesity and heart disease, which are related to poorer Covid-19 outcomes.

Finally, perhaps due to a lack of initial culturally appropriate public health messaging among some minority communities, there may have been less understanding of the need for social distancing and social isolation when an individual or family mem­ber displays symptoms.

Coincidental to the work we were doing, on June 29, the secretary of state for health, Matt Hancock, announced that Leicester was to be put under local lockdown due to a Covid-19 “outbreak” in the city. The majority of the population in Leicester is of a non-white ethnicity, and it was the first city in Eng­land to go into a local lockdown. When we looked at the data in Leicester, ethnic minority populations were over two times more likely to test positive for Covid-19 (both pre- and three weeks into the initial UK lockdown) than the white ethnic group, and to have a higher number of household residents.

Leicester is one of the most ethnically diverse cities in the UK, so it is likely that social depriva­tion, overcrowded housing, and the multi-ethnic population of the city were key factors that contrib­uted to the rise in cases. We are still in a partial lockdown with certain restrictions such as curbs on gatherings in private homes and gardens. This has certainly helped reduce the number of people who have tested positive.

Members of our research group worked along­side the city’s public health team to help produce and disseminate culturally tailored public health messages in a number of languages. We also worked to ensure the local test, trace and isolate strat­egy was culturally adapted so it would work better in Leicester’s multi-ethnic population.

Alongside this, we were awarded prestigious na­tional funding for a range of studies on ethnicity and Covid-19. These include examining outcomes in healthcare workers which will try and identify the risk of being infected with and dying from coro­navirus in healthcare workers from various ethnic groups. We are also working with University of Ox­ford to develop a risk tool that will identify individ­uals at the highest risk of severe Covid-19, based on data from in a person’s general practice records including age, sex, ethnicity and comorbidities.

Sadly, the UK is again seeing rising numbers of positive cases, particularly among the younger populations. This could be due to a variety of rea­sons, including opening up of restaurants and bars and people returning to work, but the population really need to comply with all the safety measures including face masks, social distancing and general hygiene. Nationally we must avoid a second spike and further lockdowns in cities like Leicester.

We also need to make ethnic minority people aware of taking part in Covid-19 related research, particularly the ongoing vaccine trials. Our research group will continue to push forward trying to un­derstand what the risks are for ethnic minority groups, why these risks are greater compared to white populations, and how best to protect ethnic minorities from Covid-19 now and in the future.

The South Asian Health Foundation report on Covid-19 and resources, including videos in differ­ent languages, can be downloaded from www.sahf. org.uk/covid19

Professor Kamlesh Khunti PhD MD FRCGP FRCP FMedSci is professor of Primary Care Diabetes and Vascular Medicine and NIHR senior investigator at Diabetes Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester.

More For You

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less