Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

London court dismisses attempt to reopen the Hyderabad Fund case

A London court has dismissed the Nizam of Hyderabad's descendant's attempt to reopen the Hyderabad Fund case.

Najaf Ali Khan on behalf of 116 heirs of the late seventh Nizam, sought to challenge a 2019 judgment in the Royal Courts of Justice on Wednesday (22).


Dismissing Khan’s attempt to reopen the case, Judge Marcus Smith concluded: "I have already decided that India and the princes are entitled to the monies."

"The fact is the monies have already been paid out. There can be no basis upon which an order I make after trial can be reopened by me."

In a judgment handed down at the Royal Courts of Justice in London on October 2, 2019, Justice Marcus Smith had ruled in favour of India and the titular eighth Nizam of Hyderabad and his brother, who had reached a confidential agreement in a decades-old legal dispute with Pakistan over funds belonging to the seventh Nizam of Hyderabad at the time of Partition.

Without a lawyer, Khan appeared in the court via video conferencing and had challenged the court's judgment.

Though the plea was discouraged, the Judge said that he will hear arguments over allegations of impropriety by the administrator of late seventh Nizam's estate.

The dispute began around the time of Partition. In 1948, the Nizam of Hyderabad, Asaf Jah, had sent £1 million and one 'ginni' to the then Pakistan High Commissioner's London account as a fund for "trust for safekeeping" of Hyderabad from India if there were an invasion.

However, a few days later, the Nizam denied that the fund was transferred with his consent and asked to return it. But the bank denied the request as the money was not in his name.

The bank had then said the fund could not be transferred without the agreement of Pakistan, which now had legal title to the fund.

The Nizam issued proceedings against the bank in the 1950s.

The money has been frozen ever since and the fund is now worth £35 million at the NatWest bank in the UK, as the Nizam's descendants, supported by India, claimed it belonged to them and Pakistan counter-claimed that it was rightfully theirs.

Later, the Nizam created a trust which was to be funded from the interest of his Hyderabad Fund. In 1960s, he appointed trust to his grandsons - the current claimants - and assigned his claim to the fund to the President of India.

In 2013, Pakistan sued the National Westminster Bank, the custodian of the Nizam's fund by arguing that India's claim on the Hyderabad Nizam's fund was timed out. India countered the argument saying it was Pakistan which had blocked proceedings in the case. The UK court concurred with India.

The last and the seventh grandson of the Nizam, Mukkaram Jah, who now lives in Turkey, persuaded the case to claim the money.

The Indian government and the Nizam's family came to an agreement over the matter and India supported the Nizam's claim over the money.

Justice Smith had ruled in favour of India and Princes Mukarram and Muffakham Jah in October 2019.

More For You

starmer-social-media-ban

Bereaved parents pose with images of their children outside Downing Street on May 26, 2026 in London, England.

(Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images)

Starmer promises 'game-changer' action on social media

Highlights

  • Three options are on the table, including going further than Australia's under-16 ban.
  • Evidence suggests at least 60 per cent of Australian children have found ways around their country's ban
  • The government consultation drew 70,000 responses — the biggest since the gay marriage consultation in 2012
  • Bereaved parents who met Starmer at Downing Street urged him to target harmful platform features, not just ban access

PRIME MINISTER Sir Keir Starmer is considering going further than Australia in restricting children's access to social media, promising bereaved parents that he would unveil "game-changer" action "within weeks."

Keep ReadingShow less