Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Minority ethnic Britons face 'shocking' job discrimination

The discrimination, Black Britons and those of South-Asian origin, particularly Pakistanis, face in the job market is similar to what they experienced in the late 1960s, research has found.

A study conducted by experts based at the Centre for Social Investigation at Nuffield College, University of Oxford, found that those from minority ethnic backgrounds had to send 80 per cent more applications to get a positive response from an employer than a white person of British origin, reported The Guardian.


The research is part of a larger cross-national project funded by the European Union and it has given rise to concerns that previous policies to bring down ethnic inequality have not been successful.

“The absence of any real decline in discrimination against black British and people of Pakistani background is a disturbing finding, which calls into question the effectiveness of previous policies,” Prof Anthony Heath, co-author and emeritus fellow of Nuffield College, was quoted as saying by The Guardian. “Ethnic inequality remains a burning injustice and there needs to be a radical rethink about how to tackle it.”

For the study, researchers sent almost 3,200 applications to both manual and non-manual jobs advertised on a popular recruitment platform between November 2016 and December 2017.

While an average 24 per cent of applicants of white British origin received a positive response from employers only 15 per cent of minority ethnic applicants received favourable feedback. This is despite minority applicants stating that they were either British-born or had arrived in the country by the age of six and had obtained all their education and training in Britain.

Dr Zubaida Haque, the deputy director of the race equality thinktank Runnymede, described the findings of the study shocking.

They demonstrated that “it’s not just covert racism or unconscious bias that we need to worry about; it’s overt and conscious racism, where applicants are getting shortlisted on the basis of their ethnicity and/or name”, she said.

“It’s clear that race relations legislation is not sufficient to hold employers to account. There are no real consequences for employers of racially discriminating in subtle ways, but for BME applicants or employees it means higher unemployment, lower wages, poorer conditions and less security in work and life.”

More For You

Rage bait

Rage bait isn’t just clickbait — it’s Oxford University Press’ word of the year for 2025

iStock/Gemini AI

‘Rage bait’ is Oxford University Press’s word of the year for 2025

Highlights:

  • Rage bait captures online content designed to provoke anger
  • Oxford University Press saw a threefold rise in its use over 2025
  • Beat contenders aura farming and biohack for the top spot
  • Highlights how social media manipulates attention and emotion

Rage bait is officially 2025’s word of the year, Oxford University Press confirmed on Monday, shining a light on the internet culture that has dominated the past 12 months. The term, which describes online content deliberately meant to stir anger or outrage, has surged in use alongside endless scrolling and viral social media posts, the stuff that makes you click, comment, maybe even argue.

Rage bait Rage bait isn’t just clickbait — it’s Oxford University Press’ word of the year for 2025 iStock/Gemini AI

Keep ReadingShow less