Lockdowns might have been a great opportunity to get fit, but it’s not that simple.
MIWorking from home, home-schooling, comfort eating, getting overwhelmed and feeling exhausted threw routines out of the window, and now you’re left wondering on how to get back on track. If this sounds familiar, you are not alone.University College London tracked 70,000 people during lockdown, revealing 40 per cent exercised less during the most recent lockdown compared with earlier ones, with only 13 per cent of people exercising more now. Clearly, the more inactivity the greater the impact on your overall fitness. But if you managed to get outdoors on dailywalks, you will have maintained some aerobic fitness.
Another study shows muscle strength and flexibility can start to waste within two days of inactivity, and reducing daily steps from 10,500-1,300 for two weeks induced the loss of leg muscle mass in healthy adults. But it’s not all gloomy, the pandemic has made us slow down and perhaps become more aware of our emotions and how to best regulate them. Now is a good time to start choosing exercise which fits your mood. Mood-based exercise is a thing and could actually enhance your overall wellbeing.
While there’s tonnes of information on how various exercises help your mind and body, there’s little about what workout is right for your mood. Mood dictates movement. And moodbased exercise is simple – you choose workouts based on how you are feeling on that day. Engaging in exercise which fits your current mood allows you to get the best out of your workout because you can perform with your full attention, and most importantly to what your body and mind need in that moment. As much as I love the quiet calm of yoga or amindful walk, there are times when my mood needs boosting. Like many, my go-to exercise for an endorphin pick-me-up is a high intensity workout like battle ropes, weights, cycling or running.
That said, high intensity exercise can exacerbate stress. So, it’s important to balance high intensity workouts with low impact ones. Perhaps the best way to do this is to let your mood dictate what exercise feels right for you in the moment, which gives you the opportunity to create a mindbody connection and enjoy the experience by taking pressure off.
Whether you’re feeling tired, anxious, stressed or full of energy, the point is to choose physical activity that aligns with your emotions. This beautiful concept is a great way to become more selfaware, which gives added psychological benefits to physical ones, especially in stressful times.
If you are struggling to find motivation to exercise or feeling stressed, perhaps consider a lowintensity option like yoga, a gentle bike ride or a mindful walk which gives you that feel-good slow energy boost by calming stress hormones. And if you’re feeling energetic, why not pound those pavements on a run.
With more people concerned about their health, fitness experts agree that mood-based exercise is the way forward. And let’s be honest, surely, it’s healthier and far more fun to choose exercise that is right for you in any moment rather than going to a gym class because it’s on the timetable?
Follow Mita Mistry on www.twitter.com/mitamistry or visit www.mitamistry.co.uk
US president Donald Trump gestures next to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Ben Gurion International Airport as Trump leaves Israel en route to Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, to attend a world leaders' summit on ending the Gaza war, amid a US-brokered prisoner-hostage swap and ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, in Lod, Israel, October 13, 2025.
‘They make a desert and call it peace’, wrote the Roman historian Tacitus. That was an early exercise, back in AD 96, of trying to walk in somebody else’s shoes. The historian was himself the son-in-law of the Roman Governor of Britain, yet he here imagined the rousing speech of a Caledonian chieftain to give voice to the opposition to that imperial conquest.
Nearly two thousand years later, US president Donald Trump this week headed to Sharm-El-Sheikh in the desert, to join the Egyptian, Turkish and Qatari mediators of the Gaza ceasefire. Twenty more world leaders, including prime minister Sir Keir Starmer and president Emmanuel Macron of France turned up too to witness this ceremonial declaration of peace in Gaza.
This ceasefire brings relief after two years of devastating pain. Tens of thousands of civilians have been killed. More of the Israeli hostages taken by Hamas are returning dead than alive. Eighty-five per cent of Gaza is rubble. Each of the twenty steps of the proposed peace plan may prove rocky. The state of Palestine has more recognition - in principle - than ever before across the international community, but it may be a long road to that taking practical form. Israel continues to oppose a Palestinian state.
The ceasefire will be welcomed in Britain for humanitarian relief and rekindling hopes of a path to a political settlement. It offers an opportunity to take stock on the fissures of the last two years on community relations here in Britain too. That was the theme of a powerful cross-faith conversation last week, convened by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, to reciprocate the expressions of solidarity received from Muslims, Christians and others after the Manchester synagogue attacks, and challenge the arson attack on a Sussex mosque.
Jewish and Muslim civic voices had convened an ‘optimistic alliance’ to keep conversations going when there seemed ever less to be optimistic about. The emerging news from Gaza was seen as a hopeful basis to deepen conversation in Britain about how tackling the causes of both antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice could form part of a shared commitment to cohesion.
This conflict has not seen a Brexit-style polarisation down the middle of British society. Most people’s first instinct was to avoid choosing a side in this conflict. The murderous Hamas attack on Jews on October 7, 2023 and the excesses of the Israeli assault on Gaza piled tragedy upon tragedy. The instinct to not take sides can be an expression of mutual empathy, but is not always so noble. It can reflect confusion and exhaustion with this seemingly intractable conflict. A tendency to look away and change the subject can frustrate those whose family heritage, faith solidarity or commitments to Zionism and Palestine as political ideas make them feel more closely connected.
Others have felt this conflict thrust upon them in an unwelcome way - including British Jews fed up with the antisemitic idea that they can be held responsible at school, university or work for what the government of Israel is doing. Protesters for Palestine perceive double standards in arguments about free speech - as do those with contrasting views. The proper boundaries between legitimate political protest and prejudice are sharply contested.
Hamit Coksun is an asylum seeker who speaks somewhat broken English. He would seem an unusual ally for Robert Jenrick. Yet the shadow justice secretary went to court to offer solidarity, after Coskun had burned a Qu’ran outside the Turkish Embassy, while shouting “F__ Islam” and “Islam is the religion of terrorism”. He had been fined £250, but the appeal court overturned his conviction. The judgment was context-specific: this specific incendiary protest took place outside an embassy, not a place of worship, in an empty street, and did not direct the comments at anybody in particular.
The law does not protect faiths from criticism, and indeed offers some protection for intolerant and prejudiced political speech too, though the police can place conditions on protest to protect people from abuse, intimidation or harassment on the basis of their faith.
So it can be legal to performatively burn books - holy or otherwise - though this verdict makes clear it does not offer a green light to do so in every context.
But how far should we celebrate those who choose to burn books? Cosun advocates banning the Qu’ran, making him a flawed champion of free speech. Jenrick is legitimately concerned to show that there are no laws against blasphemy in Britain, but could anybody imagine that he would turn up in person to show solidarity to a man burning the Bible, Bhagvad Gita or Torah, shouting profanities to declaring religion of war or genocide? The court’s defence of the right to shock, offend and provoke is correct in law. Those are hardly the only conversations that a shared society needs.
Sunder Katwalawww.easterneye.biz
Sunder Katwala is the director of thinktank British Future and the author of the book How to Be a Patriot: The must-read book on British national identity and immigration.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.