Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Nationality and Borders Bill will make UK safer, says Patel

Nationality and Borders Bill will make UK safer, says Patel

THE UK has a proud history of being open to the world. Global Britain continues in that tradition.

Our society is enriched by legal migration and we are a better country for it.

The Government’s Nationality and Borders Bill, back in the House of Lords and one step closer to becoming law, builds upon our proud tradition of helping those in need from around the world. This will never change.

The Bill is designed to make our immigration system fair to those who play by the rules, and firm on those who seek to abuse the system.

UK targets scientific ways to determine asylum seekers' age Home Secretary Priti Patel (Photo by Victoria Jones - Pool/Getty Images)

  • For example, the Bill will address many of the unfair historical anomalies around citizenship which have existed for too long in British Nationality law.
  • British Nationality law has not changed significantly since 1983, and some of the provisions are very much outdated.
  • One change we are making to address this is introducing a new adult registration route so that I, as the Home Secretary has the discretion to grant citizenship to adults in certain circumstances. This covers a range of cases, including where exceptional circumstances have prevented an individual from becoming a British citizen.

Also Read | 'Tories have a problem with Asians'


We will also introduce further flexibility to waive residence requirements for naturalisation more quickly in exceptional cases. For instance, where people are not able to meet residence requirements to qualify for British citizenship through no fault of their own. This will help to ensure injustices like those faced by the Windrush generation categorically never happen again.

These significant changes to Nationality law will protect people from a range of injustices that we have seen in the past, ensuring that the system is fair.

I have found it completely shocking that opponents to the Nationality and Borders Bill have deliberately mischaracterised and misrepresented some important measures we are trying to introduce. One of these is specifically around proposals in the Bill relating to removing British citizenship.

Irresponsible scaremongering has regrettably led to considerable confusion and fear, which is why I want to offer some reassurance here specifically about deprivation of citizenship and what the Bill will mean for this important power.

It has been wrongly suggested that six million dual-nationality Britons could face having their British citizenship taken away, or that future Home Secretaries could deprive people of citizenship for minor misdemeanours just because we felt like it. These claims are the most wildly inaccurate reports I have seen in recent months. The reality is that the part of the Bill concerning what are called Deprivation Notices is just an administrative change.

Removing British citizenship has been possible for over a century – since the 1914 British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act. The power is currently contained within the British Nationality Act of 1981, so this is nothing new. It is only used against those who have acquired citizenship by fraud, and against the most dangerous people - like terrorists, extremists, and serious organised criminals. It is not something that will affect ordinary people. It always comes with a right of appeal.

However, the change we are making is nothing to do with any of that. It is simply about the process of notifying someone about removal of their citizenship. We will always try to tell someone that their citizenship has been deprived, but it might not be possible in exceptional circumstances – for example, if they are in a warzone or if informing them would reveal sensitive intelligence sources. It can’t be right that we are unable to protect the public with this measure because someone tries to hide from the law, or because there is no effective postal service.

It does not breach human rights or international law. It is simply untrue that it will have a disproportionate impact on non-white British citizens or those with dual passports. The suggestion that millions of people could be stripped of their nationality without warning or left stateless is not rooted in reality.

The Nationality and Borders Bill contains vital measures to make the UK safer and protect our borders – something that is in the interests of all Britons. And we will continue to welcome highly- killed people from around the world and to offer sanctuary to those fleeing persecution. Far from being inhumane, it will finally mean that we have a system which is fair but firm.

More For You

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less