Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

New commission urges people to share their stories of bereavement

New commission urges people to share their stories of bereavement

I HAVE written at length about my experience of bereavement. And I have no intention – for your sake as much as mine – of revisiting that story here. But the process of writing, and the reflection that accompanied it, prompted me to realise that as a society, we don’t handle bereavement as well as we could, or indeed, should.

Grief is not an illness, and bereavement forms an intrinsic part of the human condition. But while, as a society, we spend large amounts of time pondering our response to other aspects of that condition – illness and, increasingly, ageing coming to mind –it strikes me that we’ve never really had a similar debate about how we as people or as a society should address the impact of death on those left behind.


The pandemic has made us think about things more deeply than we did before, and specific Covid-related problems have made the bereavement process still more difficult. Think about those denied the chance to visit loved ones in hospital or care homes before they died; or the difficulties relatives experienced having in-person conversations with hospital staff; the disruption of rituals associated with death or, indeed, the strange nature of death at a time of mass fatalities, when those suffering bereavement experienced a relative lack of empathy for their individual grief.

The opportunity provided by the pandemic to discuss death more honestly and openly than we did previously is one we must seize. Yet, we should beware the danger, once Covid is behind us, of simply placing death and bereavement back into that dark corner where it once hid. We must use what we’ve learned to address the issues around bereavement more effectively.

It is for this reason that a UK Commission on Bereavement has been launched. Its purpose is to review the experiences of, and support available to, people who have been affected by bereavement, both before and during the pandemic; and to make recommendations to key decision-makers, including the UK government.

DP comment Anand Menon byline pic Prof Anand Menon

The commission is independent of government and made up of a group of 15 commissioners who were appointed by a steering group of charities including Marie Curie, Independent Age, the National Bereavement Alliance and Childhood Bereavement Network, Cruse Bereavement Care and the Centre for Mental Health.

The aim of our work is first, to understand people’s experience of bereavement in order that recommendations can be put forward to address the problems people have faced. To date, evidence taken from those who have suffered the death of a loved one point to several areas where society can do better.

Employers, for instance, need to show flexibility and understanding when it comes to staff members who have experienced a bereavement. Equally, the death of a loved one can lead to unexpected financial challenges – whether these be the cost of care, taking early retirement to care for a partner or indeed (don’t get me started on this) hospital parking charges.

Meanwhile, bereavement support often only lasts 18 months. There’s also the bureaucracy of death. Cancelling cards, changing names on accounts, digging out original documents, and claiming for insurance can be bewildering and time consuming at the best of times, and times of bereavement are not the best of times.

Steps must be taken to ensure we do all we can as a society to provide practical support for the bereaved. We need to consider things such as greater employer flexibility, or the provision of easy-to-access specialist advice on employment or financial matters.

All this is without considering the emotional impact of a death on those left behind. Too often, people struggle to cope as the world carries on around them, apparently indifferent to their grief. Those who have already shared their experience with the commission have spoken of a lack of face-to-face emotional support and children often being overlooked.

This is partly a question of helping parents know how to talk to them about death, and partly ensuring adequate support from schools. Currently, the commission is engaged in a process of listening and learning.

We want to hear from everyone who has experienced bereavement and are willing to share their stories.

We are particularly keen to hear from people from BAME communities as to date, only a small number of our respondents are from black or Asian minority ethnic backgrounds – lower than the proportion of these groups in the population as a whole.

This is a unique opportunity to help inform the findings of an inquiry into what we have now all come to realise is a serious issue. Please consider coming forward with your stories so we can treat bereavement with the respect it deserves. If there’s one thing we should learn to do better following this pandemic, it is to deal with the challenge of bereavement.

For more information and if you want o share your story, visit bereavementcommission.org.uk

Anand Menon is a professor of European Politics and Foreign Affairs at Kings College London, and is also a commissioner for the UK Commission

on Bereavement

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less