Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

NHS at 75: A vision of who we are and the society we want to be

The NHS is also the paradigm in the public mind of how Britain can benefit from immigration, says the expert

NHS at 75: A vision of who we are and the society we want to be

THE NHS is the closest thing that the English people have to a religion, former Chancellor Nigel Lawson once complained. Did last week’s Westminster Abbey service to mark the National Health Service’s 75th birthday not rather prove his point?

“We gather in thanksgiving for both the grace of God and the grace and glory that is the NHS,” said the Dean to open the service. The George Cross, awarded to the NHS by the late Queen, was processed to the altar, evoking the Coronation. Some commentators found it an odd, even unhealthy approach to a public service. Yet, witnessing it in person, I found it a powerful and moving event. One of its primary purposes was to thank NHS staff. Over two thousand were present, proud to represent colleagues from around the UK. That was not the only reason why snark about the service seemed to miss the point.


“Though we gather in this sacred place, we do not do so to beatify or deify an institution,” said Amanda Pritchard, NHS England Chief Executive, who acknowledged that the NHS does not always live up to its ideals.   Pritchard asserted, accurately, that “the NHS remains the institution that makes our nation most proud to be British – a cornerstone of national life and our shared identity.” I doubt that critics who contend that it is irrational to make a public service like the NHS a source of national pride would ever say the same about the Army.

Amanda Amanda Pritchard, Chief Executive of NHS England, speaks at the NHS anniversary ceremony as part of the health service's 75th anniversary celebrations at Westminster Abbey (Photo by Jordan Pettitt - Pool/Getty Images)

A thoughtful service captured why the Established Church would celebrate Britain’s most cherished secular institution, emphasising their shared concern for compassion and human dignity in matters of life and death. This was another national occasion fully at ease with modern Britain as a society of many faiths and none.

After our Hindu Prime Minister read from the Christian Bible, doctors from different faiths offered blessings from the Abbey pulpit, finding parallel sentiments in the words of Lord Krishna, the Quran and the Sikh holy book. The Labour Party leader read a Bible passage about the creation of a “New Jerusalem”, evoking how religious language had been deployed to make the post-war case for the NHS. Few people have noticed that Starmer would be Britain’s first openly atheist Prime Minister if elected next year, although Clement Attlee, Prime Minister when the NHS was created in 1948, did confide decades later to his biographer that he had been a believer in the ethics of Christianity, but “not the mumbo-jumbo”.

GettyImages 1501996072 Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer, speaks at the NHS anniversary ceremony as part of the health service's 75th anniversary celebrations at Westminster Abbey (Photo by Jordan Pettitt - Pool/Getty Images)

The NHS exemplifies several important British public values. Above all, an idea of fairness – that access to healthcare should not be dependent on the ability to pay. The NHS is also the paradigm in the public mind of how Britain can benefit from immigration. Dame Elizabeth Anionwu spoke powerfully of her Nigerian-Irish heritage and the foundational contribution to the NHS of the Windrush generation and their successors.

GettyImages 1501995670 Dame Elizabeth Anionwu speaks at the NHS anniversary ceremony (Photo by Jordan Pettitt - Pool/Getty Images)

LEAD Comment Sunder Katwala byline pic 1 Sunder Katwala

My own parents came to this country from India and Ireland, meeting while working in the NHS as a doctor and a nurse. The 75th anniversary of Windrush has been one prominent theme of the NHS’s 75th birthday celebrations because the stories of migration and the NHS are inextricably linked in the story of modern Britain.  That has made the NHS modern Britain’s most ethnically diverse workforce. Perhaps we underestimate the NHS’s role in ensuring that almost everyone in Britain has some experience of meaningful inter-ethnic contact, including in areas that are 99% white, and the contribution that makes to confidence in a multi-ethnic Britain. The institution itself, nevertheless, still has work to do internally on race equality.

Shadow Health Secretary Wes Streeting recently called the NHS “a service not a shrine” directly echoing Lawson in worrying that “thinking of it as a national religion” could get in the way of the best outcomes. Yet there have been many periods of NHS reform – some more successful than others. Lawson knew that the public will always trust doctors and nurses more than politicians. Successful reform needs to take the staff and public with it.

GettyImages 1501994250 The Order of Service and the George Cross which was presented to the National Health Service on show at the NHS anniversary ceremony as part of the health service's 75th anniversary celebrations at Westminster Abbey (Photo by Jordan Pettitt - Pool/Getty Images)

To worry that public faith in the NHS could impede reform could underestimate how national pride can be compatible with challenge and critique. Was not the creation of the NHS itself part of a patriotic call – “now win the peace” – that was clear about what needed to change? Public faith in the NHS can be a resource for reform, not a barrier to it, if change seeks to deliver its enduring mission. The post-pandemic paradox is that the NHS has rarely been under more pressure on service delivery and patient satisfaction while reinforcing the public commitment to its core principles as strongly as ever before. The message of the Westminster Abbey bells, pealing as we spilled out into the sunshine, was how much the NHS remains a potent symbol of who we think we are – and what type of society we want to be.

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less