Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

One year in, Sunak eyes future and likely legacy

‘Prime minister must keep pushing for an electoral turnaround’

One year in, Sunak eyes future and likely legacy

DO not expect any more parties in Downing Street this week to mark the anniversary of Rishi Sunak becoming prime minister. It was an understated moment of British social history, as Britain’s first Asian prime minister walked into Number 10 alone, with a few words about fixing mistakes to get the economy back on track. The political message to his party was a stark one: “unite or die”.

If economic recovery has been a hard slog, political unity has been harder still to come by. Two of the biggest by-election defeats in post-war political history confirm that Sunak’s political prospects are shakier now than they were a year ago. Opinions differ on whether the problem was an almost impossible inheritance, or how he has played a difficult hand, but the growing consensus acknowledges that the path to an unlikely electoral comeback is narrower than ever.


This anniversary introduces a new danger. It ends the 12-month grace period during which a new leaders cannot face a formal no confidence vote; 53 Conservative MPs can now trigger such a ballot. Destabilising headlines about how many may be tempted have already begun, but most of Sunak's colleagues think another leadership change is crazy talk. It would take a majority of his MPs – 176 MPs – to actually sack Sunak. Losing a first prime minister to the partygate scandal may have been a misfortune, but losing a second to the Trussonomics implosion felt more like carelessness. A third change would be a political circus. Potential successors may rather wait until after the general election than try to wrest what may be a poisoned chalice from Sunak now.

LEAD Comment Sunak INSET GettyImages 1719619451 Sunak with home secretary Suella Braverman earlier this month; both have pledged to ‘stop the boats’ (Photo by James Manning - WPA Pool/Getty Images)

Arguably, bringing back Boris Johnson – the prime minister last time the public were asked – could be more legitimate than introducing a fourth prime minister in one parliament. But Johnson left the Commons, so would need a by-election to come back in. The fantasy of Johnson’s return can be left to political fiction. So I expect Sunak to survive, but threats of a no-confidence vote may feature in party arguments on flashpoint issues – including tax, immigration and whether to threaten to leave the European Convention on Human Rights.

Prime ministers struggling politically are never short of advice – mostly from people arguing that their own hobby-horses would deliver a dramatic political comeback.  Johnson understood that the 2019 victory was won partly with the votes of people who do not identify with the Conservatives. “I can imagine people’s pencils hovering over the ballot paper and wavering,” he said, noting some voters were breaking the habit of generations. Many Conservative commentators seem to have forgotten this, always arguing that Sunak needs to move right to recover – by cutting tax and spending, slashing immigration or dialling up the ‘war on woke’ – rather than addressing the cost of living and the NHS.

Focusing on voters flirting with Reform and those who are currently undecided looks like a “limit the damage” strategy to try to get back towards 35 per cent in the polls. That could create a path to denying Labour an overall majority. But Sunak has no serious path back to Downing Street without also targeting the five pe cent of the electorate who have switched directly from Conservatives to Labour – and who ‘count double’ in head-to- head marginal seats.

The length of Sunak’s stay in 10 Downing Street may depend primarily on when he decides to hold the general election. A new More in Common survey shows most of the public want this to be as soon as possible. They are likely to be disappointed. The Labour opposition plan to taunt a mandate-less prime minister for delaying the moment of electoral reckoning, but Sunak looks set to play it long.

LEAD Comment Sunder Katwala byline pic 1 Sunder Katwala

These by-election defeats put the final nail in the coffin of a May 2024 general election to coincide with the Mayoral and local elections. Early Autumn has little appeal. Unless the government really could ‘stop the boats’, those Channel crossings tend to peak in August and September. An October election would mean a clash with the US Biden-Trump showdown. A useful new Institute of Government briefing comparing these scenarios may leave its readers thinking that the latest date possible – 23rd January 2025 – may be an underestimated possibility. That would provoke public annoyance at election campaigning through the Christmas holiday. My own hunch is for December 12, 2024, the fifth anniversary of the last general election.

So, Sunak's big choices for the next year include the election date, how to balance governing and campaigning, and the content of his re-election campaign. His battle against inflation constrains the scope for a tax cuts or spending giveaways. The prime minister wants to engage in long-term issues, from the Middle East to the future of Artificial Intelligence, which have limited electoral salience. As a party leader, Sunak must keep pushing for a near-miraculous electoral turnaround. It may be that the character of the forthcoming campaign, one rather more likely to result in defeat than victory, will ultimately define the Sunak legacy.

More For You

UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less