PAKISTAN’S Army has said it has "nothing to do with politics" as it asserted that its chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa will retire on November 29 "no matter what."
Amidst a vicious social media campaign against the powerful "establishment" for not backing former prime minister Imran Khan, military spokesman major general Babar Iftikhar said that Pakistan's survival “lies solely on democracy” and its strength lies in the institutions, be it Parliament, Supreme Court or the Armed forces.
The Pakistan Army has "nothing to do with politics" and the institution has decided to remain apolitical in the future as well, he told a press conference on Thursday (14), three days after opposition leader Shehbaz Sharif was sworn in as the new prime minister.
Khan, who came to power in 2018, reportedly with the backing of the military, became the first Pakistan prime minister who was defeated in a no-confidence vote in the National Assembly earlier this month.
Iftikhar confirmed that Khan had approached the army chief to find a solution to the political crisis.
"It is unfortunate that our political leadership was not ready to talk. So the army chief and DG ISI went to the PM Office and three scenarios were discussed," he said, recalling that one was that the no-confidence motion should be held as it was. The others were that the prime minister would resign or the no-confidence motion was retracted and the assemblies were dissolved.
Iftikhar rejected the rumours circulating on social media about the establishment meeting the opposition parties. "There is no truth to this," he asserted.
He clarified that General Bajwa was "unwell" on the day Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) president Sharif took office and had to skip the oath-taking ceremony on Monday (11).
Iftikhar also announced that General Bajwa, 61, will retire this year.
"Let me put this to rest. The chief of army staff is neither seeking an extension nor will he accept an extension. No matter what, he will be retiring on the 29th of November 2022," he said.
General Bajwa, who was appointed by then prime minister Nawaz Sharif in 2016, was granted an extension in August 2019 by the Khan government.
Iftikhar rubbished the rumours about the threat of martial law at the height of the recent political turmoil.
"There will never be martial law in Pakistan."
To a question about the opening of courts in the middle of the night when the battle for the no-confidence vote was going on, he said that it was a decision by the courts and the army had nothing to do with it.
The powerful army, which has ruled the coup-prone country for more than half of its 73 plus years of existence, has wielded considerable power in the matters of security and foreign policy.
Khan, who was ousted from power on Sunday (10), had apparently also lost the support of the Army after he refused to endorse the appointment of the ISI spy agency chief last year. Finally, he agreed but it soured his ties with the Army.
In response to a question, the spokesman said that the army was on board with the visit of Khan to Russia. But termed it embarrassing when Russia launched an attack on Ukraine when Khan was in Moscow. The spokesman said that the United States had not asked Pakistan to provide army bases after withdrawing from Afghanistan.
"But if the US had asked for the bases, the army's response would have been the same as that of PM Khan,” he said.
(PTI)
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

The IMF has urged Britain to consider public spending reforms as the debate over bank taxes intensifies
REUTERS
IMF warns UK against higher bank taxes ahead of October budget
Oct 16, 2026
- The IMF says Britain should consider spending reforms rather than rely on higher taxes on banks.
- Unions and think tanks argue a higher bank surcharge could raise billions of pounds.
- Banks and business groups warn further sector-specific taxes could deter investment and weaken competitiveness.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has urged Britain to consider cutting public spending rather than raising taxes on banks, as the Government weighs options to strengthen its finances ahead of the October 28 budget.
Chancellor John Healey is reportedly considering reversing a reduction in the bank tax surcharge, but the IMF has suggested that spending reforms should play a greater role in balancing the public finances.
Helge Berger, deputy director in the IMF’s European department, addressed the issue at a press conference in Bangkok, Thailand, during the fund’s annual meetings. He said Britain’s tax take, at roughly 40 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), was historically high and argued that revenue-raising measures needed to be balanced against action on spending.
Berger pointed to modernising property taxation and broadening the tax base for consumption taxes such as value-added tax (VAT) as potential ways to raise revenue. He also cautioned against increasing taxes on labour, saying they could discourage people from working.
On spending, he highlighted possible changes to the state pension triple lock and better targeting of social benefits.
“Ultimately, with taxes roughly at 40% of GDP, that is historically for Britain a high number,” Berger said, adding that the IMF would place greater emphasis on expenditure measures than on the proposed bank tax increase.
Bank tax debate intensifies
The Chancellor is reportedly considering reversing the reduction in the bank surcharge from 8 per cent to 3 per cent, introduced by former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt.
Trade unions and think tanks have repeatedly called for a higher levy, arguing that banks should contribute more to public finances. The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has called for the surcharge to rise to 16 per cent, claiming this could raise £24 billion over four years.
TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said: “The Treasury has already lost £6 billion in revenue from the Tories’ senseless bank tax cut – now it’s time to make sure banks pay their fair share.”
The Institute for Public Policy Research has also proposed a temporary surcharge on commercial banks’ windfall profits. The measure forms part of a package the think tank says could raise an additional £16 billion to help struggling households.
The organisation has argued that the Chancellor’s fiscal buffer has fallen by up to £15 billion since the spring, adding to pressure on the Government to find room in its finances.
However, banks and business groups have warned that increasing the surcharge could make the UK less attractive to investors. UK Finance said a higher bank tax would weaken competitiveness, discourage investment and job creation, and conflict with the Government’s growth ambitions.
Louise Hellem, chief economist at the Confederation of British Industry, said the budget should “avoid measures that would undermine competitiveness or weaken incentives to invest”.
She added that businesses were already contributing a record share of tax receipts and argued against further sector-specific taxation, particularly for a banking sector that already faced a higher tax rate than some competing international financial centres.
The debate highlights the choices facing the Government as it seeks to support households and businesses amid cost-of-living pressures while maintaining control of public finances. The October 28 budget will reveal how the Chancellor intends to balance demands for additional revenue with concerns over investment, growth and spending.
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
News
Sri Lankan PM urges citizens to use gas, fuel sparingly amid worsening crisis
Krishna bhanu
07 June 2022









