Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Panama Papers: Reprieve for Nawaz Sharif as court rules evidence is insufficient

PAKISTAN'S Supreme Court today (April 20) ruled there was insufficient evidence to order prime minister Nawaz Sharif's removal from office over corruption allegations levelled by the opposition and it ordered further investigations.

A verdict to dismiss Sharif would have left his party in power but would have sparked turmoil at a time when Pakistan is experiencing modest growth and improved security, and the civilian government and powerful military have appeared to come to uneasy terms.


Pakistan's stock market jumped after the ruling with the benchmark index gaining almost two per cent. Sharif is seen as pro-business.

Two of five judges on the court bench recommended that Sharif should step down but they were out voted.

The court ordered a joint investigation team to be formed to look into allegations around three of Sharif's four children using offshore companies to buy properties in London.

Sharif and his children deny any wrongdoing.

One of Pakistan's richest men, the prime minister told parliament last year that his family wealth was acquired legally in the decades before he entered politics.

The team has two months to complete its inquiry.

Analysts and opposition politicians said the ruling was a blow to Sharif's credibility and the inquiry's findings could yet weaken the prime minister as he heads into a general election, due by May 2018.

But for now, Sharif and his ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, are celebrating.

Sharif's daughter and his presumptive political heir, Maryam Nawaz Sharif, posted a photo on her Twitter account of the family welcoming the court's decision.

"We are ready for all kinds of investigation," Sharif's defence minister, Khawaja Asif, told reporters outside the court.

The Supreme Court agreed last year to investigate the Sharif family's offshore wealth after opposition leader Imran Khan threatened street protests following the leaking of the "Panama Papers" in 2015.

Khan called on Sharif to step down until the investigation was completed.

"The prime minister should immediately resign at least for the 60 days until JIT completes its work," Khan told reporters, referring to the joint investigation team.

"How can he continue as prime minister when he is being investigated? What moral grounds does he have to continue in office?"

Farogh Naseem, a Supreme Court lawyer and sitting senator, said Sharif could breathe easy, for now.

"It was a close call for the prime minister," he told Reuters. "There is no clean chit for the prime minister, but for the time being he has been saved from being disqualified."

Naseem said that with three of the institutions involved in the joint investigation under Sharif's control, a decision against him was unlikely.

Khan's party has indicated that it would not launch a new street protests if it was disappointed by the judgement.

(Reuters)

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

hindu-muslim-uk

The wife initially arrived in the UK in 2022 on a student visa, with her husband joining her as her dependent.

Photo for representation: iStock

Hindu-Muslim couple win damages claim over separation before India deportation

Highlights

  • High Court judge Simon Tinkler rules couple may be owed damages over breach of Article 8 right to family life
  • Couple's asylum challenge was rejected, but their separation in detention was found to be an "unlawful interference"
  • Wife and husband, referred to as FNB and FNN, were detained on 11 September 2025 pending removal to India

A MUSLIM man and his Hindu wife who had sought asylum in the UK on the grounds of feared persecution over their interfaith marriage have won a claim over being separated while in detention ahead of being deported to India.

Keep ReadingShow less