Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Prison ‘not the best way to prevent extremism’

By Barnie Choudhury

Former BBC journalist

IN MARCH 2005, I was having coffee with an officer from the National Crime Squad, and she asked me what my biggest fear was post-9/11.


I knew children as young as seven were being groomed to sell drugs, and I had heard chatter from Muslim contacts that, in the same way, teenagers were being radicalised to embrace an extreme form of Islam. So, I said my biggest fear was a 14-year old strapping a home-made bomb to himself, going to school and blowing himself up. Four months later, something similar to this awful premonition played out in London.

In the following weeks and months, as I had done since September 11, 2001, I spoke to scores of Muslims. I wanted to get my head around why ordinary young people brought up in Britain, a mainly tolerant country, would kill themselves and innocents in such a horrific way. Yes, we had gone to war in Iraq on a false premise. Yes, we appeared to be doing America’s bidding. And yes, we seemed to Muslims to be too pro-Israeli. But that just did not explain why young people would commit carnage.

In 2006, the New Labour government introduced something called ‘Prevent’. Over several administrations the programme has changed, but ultimately it uses early intervention to try and stop different communities from being radicalised. On the face of it, this can only be a good idea. But Muslims I have spoken to are suspicious that it amounts to criminalising their youth. To some, the authorities have done little to gain the trust of communities. They feel everyone questions their motives and loyalty to Britain, and the presumption of innocence, enshrined in article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is not applied to them.

Their suspicions were reinforced when the United Nations, no less, criticised the UK government’s Prevent agenda. In 2017, a report said the policy was “unpredictable and potentially arbitrary” and it was “dividing, stigmatizing and alienating segments of the population”.

Now after the latest attack in London last week, the government made its case to change the early release of those convicted of terrorism. That, sadly, is not the answer.

The problem is that organised gangs and criminals – for that is what terrorists are – do not care about the niceties of law, ethics or values. Their only job is to kill people. Their sole intention is to bend us to their will by making us scared and driving us to our most basic instinct, do or die. Their aim is to create a world in their perverse image. For some Muslims, it is to make women subservient. For white right-wing supremacists, it is to rid the world of those who have a different skin colour.

As we have seen on the last two occasions, prison is ineffective. If anything, our jails are infested with hardcore radicals who feed off new inmates like parasites attacking a sick body. Locking them up and throwing away the key is one solution. But a better one is to try to find out the danger signs in the first place.

I am not clever. I just try to study habits. But it seems to me that some of our extremists come from poor, socially deprived areas, whose families are either too strict; have an ethos which segregates different cultures, creeds and religion; or feel they have no connection with their parents and relations. They are looking for a family. They are looking for a cause. They are looking for affirmation. How easy then to lavish love and affection by making these confused kids feel valued?

And this is where south Asians must intervene. We need to ask ourselves whether we are setting up our children to fail. With every passing generation, the need to stick to the values of ‘back home’ becomes stronger. We try to hang on to how our forefathers lived and extracted discipline. Yet visit some south Asian countries and you will find things have changed. Young girls wear skimpy tops, dance provocatively and drink whiskey shots in nightclubs; young men and women are homosexual; women can be leaders; and the world has not ended.

I am not saying that we abandon everything that is great about south Asian culture. What I am urging us to do is acknowledge that we can learn so much from a western way of life and, like our cooking, if we combine the best of the best, we produce a tastier dish and a safer world. Ultimately there is no brown race, there is no black race and there is no white race. There is just the human race.

More For You

Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’
Kanishka Narayan (centre) with fellow visiting British MPs, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma (left) and other officials

‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’

Kanishka Narayan

FOUR months since my election to parliament, I had the opportunity to join my parliamentary colleagues on a delegation to India, visiting Delhi and Jaipur for conversations with our Indian counterparts, business leaders and academics.

I went to make the case for Indian investment in my constituency and across the UK.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’
(From left) Professor Ted Cantle, Sunder Katwala, Sara Khan and John Denham at the event

‘Ministers must unveil vision for bridging societal divides’

Sunder Katwala

“SOCIAL cohesion is not the absence of riots.”

John Denham put that central point pithily at the ‘After the Riots’ cohesion summit last week.

Keep ReadingShow less