Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Prison ‘not the best way to prevent extremism’

By Barnie Choudhury

Former BBC journalist

IN MARCH 2005, I was having coffee with an officer from the National Crime Squad, and she asked me what my biggest fear was post-9/11.


I knew children as young as seven were being groomed to sell drugs, and I had heard chatter from Muslim contacts that, in the same way, teenagers were being radicalised to embrace an extreme form of Islam. So, I said my biggest fear was a 14-year old strapping a home-made bomb to himself, going to school and blowing himself up. Four months later, something similar to this awful premonition played out in London.

In the following weeks and months, as I had done since September 11, 2001, I spoke to scores of Muslims. I wanted to get my head around why ordinary young people brought up in Britain, a mainly tolerant country, would kill themselves and innocents in such a horrific way. Yes, we had gone to war in Iraq on a false premise. Yes, we appeared to be doing America’s bidding. And yes, we seemed to Muslims to be too pro-Israeli. But that just did not explain why young people would commit carnage.

In 2006, the New Labour government introduced something called ‘Prevent’. Over several administrations the programme has changed, but ultimately it uses early intervention to try and stop different communities from being radicalised. On the face of it, this can only be a good idea. But Muslims I have spoken to are suspicious that it amounts to criminalising their youth. To some, the authorities have done little to gain the trust of communities. They feel everyone questions their motives and loyalty to Britain, and the presumption of innocence, enshrined in article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is not applied to them.

Their suspicions were reinforced when the United Nations, no less, criticised the UK government’s Prevent agenda. In 2017, a report said the policy was “unpredictable and potentially arbitrary” and it was “dividing, stigmatizing and alienating segments of the population”.

Now after the latest attack in London last week, the government made its case to change the early release of those convicted of terrorism. That, sadly, is not the answer.

The problem is that organised gangs and criminals – for that is what terrorists are – do not care about the niceties of law, ethics or values. Their only job is to kill people. Their sole intention is to bend us to their will by making us scared and driving us to our most basic instinct, do or die. Their aim is to create a world in their perverse image. For some Muslims, it is to make women subservient. For white right-wing supremacists, it is to rid the world of those who have a different skin colour.

As we have seen on the last two occasions, prison is ineffective. If anything, our jails are infested with hardcore radicals who feed off new inmates like parasites attacking a sick body. Locking them up and throwing away the key is one solution. But a better one is to try to find out the danger signs in the first place.

I am not clever. I just try to study habits. But it seems to me that some of our extremists come from poor, socially deprived areas, whose families are either too strict; have an ethos which segregates different cultures, creeds and religion; or feel they have no connection with their parents and relations. They are looking for a family. They are looking for a cause. They are looking for affirmation. How easy then to lavish love and affection by making these confused kids feel valued?

And this is where south Asians must intervene. We need to ask ourselves whether we are setting up our children to fail. With every passing generation, the need to stick to the values of ‘back home’ becomes stronger. We try to hang on to how our forefathers lived and extracted discipline. Yet visit some south Asian countries and you will find things have changed. Young girls wear skimpy tops, dance provocatively and drink whiskey shots in nightclubs; young men and women are homosexual; women can be leaders; and the world has not ended.

I am not saying that we abandon everything that is great about south Asian culture. What I am urging us to do is acknowledge that we can learn so much from a western way of life and, like our cooking, if we combine the best of the best, we produce a tastier dish and a safer world. Ultimately there is no brown race, there is no black race and there is no white race. There is just the human race.

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Peace in Middle East hinges on Trump’s volatile decisions’

Israeli military vehicles stationed in Nabatieh, Lebanon, last Sunday (26)

‘Peace in Middle East hinges on Trump’s volatile decisions’

CAN the ceasefire endure for any significant length of time? This would go some way to ameliorating the incredible suffering in the region, but does it all hinge on one man, more than the future of the region has ever depended in its entire history?

Ceasefires can’t hold if no progress is made in addressing the underlying issues that led to the conflict in the first place.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less