BRITISH home secretary Priti Patel has slammed the critics of her government’s controversial immigration deal with Rwanda and the BBC’s “xenophobic” overtones in reporting the matter.
She was "taken aback" by the tone of BBC journalists' references to Rwanda after the agreement with the African country was announced, she told The Telegraph.
She said the corporation’s “undercurrent” was similar to the views expressed by opposition parties.
"When you hear the critics start to stereotype, start to generalise, first of all that's all very offensive. It's deeply offensive, and it's based on ignorance and prejudice, some of this, in my view. I could call them lazy and sloppy characterisations, but actually they're not. I heard plenty of that not long after the announcement was made”.
"There are always going to be critics, and we live in a free country," she said in an interview with the newspaper published on Saturday (23).
According to documents published by the government last week, Patel overruled reservations from officials about her plan to send thousands of asylum seekers to Rwanda.
The plan, unveiled by prime minister Boris Johnson, seeks to act as a deterrent to migrants who make illegal boat crossings to Britain from France.
It has drawn heavy criticism from political opponents and campaigners.
In an exchange of letters with Patel, the top official in the Home Office highlighted uncertainty over the scheme's value to the taxpayer.
The government has said it would contribute an initial £120 million to the scheme.
"I do not believe sufficient evidence can be obtained to demonstrate that the policy will have a deterrent effect significant enough to make the policy value for money," Home Office permanent secretary Matthew Rycroft said.
Patel acknowledged the concerns but stated her belief that without taking action to stop the crossings, both the monetary costs and the loss of life among those who attempt to navigate the busy shipping channel would rise.
"It would therefore be imprudent in my view, as home secretary, to allow the absence of quantifiable and dynamic modelling ... to delay delivery of a policy that we believe will reduce illegal migration, save lives, and ultimately break the business model of the smuggling gangs," she wrote.
Last year, more than 28,000 migrants and refugees made the crossing from mainland Europe to Britain, a fraction of the number arriving in other European countries, but enough to keep immigration a politically sensitive topic among some voters.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testifies during a House Select Intelligence Committee hearing on March 19, 2026 in Washington, DC. The hearing was held to assess worldwide threats in 2026.
(Photo by Heather Diehl/Getty Images)
Tulsi Gabbard seeks criminal probe into officials behind Trump's impeachment
Apr 16, 2026
- Gabbard has referred the Trump impeachment whistleblower and former intelligence watchdog Michael Atkinson to the Justice Department for criminal investigation
- The released documents identify no specific crimes, and Gabbard admits she is "leaving it up to the lawyers" to determine what laws were broken
- The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee warns the move will "chill future whistleblowers"
THE director of National Intelligence in the US, Tulsi Gabbard, has sent criminal referrals to the Justice Department seeking investigations into the whistleblower whose complaint led to president Donald Trump's first impeachment in 2019, as well as the former intelligence community watchdog who handled the case.
The referrals, confirmed by a spokesperson for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and first reported by Fox News, target the still-anonymous whistleblower who raised concerns about Trump's July 2019 phone call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky.
During the conversation, Trump urged Zelensky to investigate then-former vice president Joe Biden — as well as former intelligence community inspector General Michael Atkinson, who subsequently informed Congress of the complaint.
The general counsel for Gabbard's office cited "possible criminal activity in violation of federal criminal law committed by one or more former employees of the intelligence community," according to various media reports.
The specific crimes alleged have not been publicly disclosed, and it remains unclear whether the Department of Justice will pursue an investigation.

The referrals follow the release earlier this week of newly declassified documents that Gabbard claimed exposed a "coordinated effort" to "manufacture a conspiracy" used to impeach Trump.
In a statement accompanying the documents, Gabbard said: "Deep state actors within the Intelligence Community concocted a false narrative that was used by Congress to usurp the will of the American people and impeach the duly-elected president of the US."
However, the documents, which include transcripts of Atkinson's closed-door testimony before the House Intelligence Committee in 2019 and notes from interviews with the whistleblower, do not appear to contain specific evidence of criminal wrongdoing, nor do they challenge the core facts presented during the impeachment proceedings.
When pressed on precisely which laws she believes were broken, Gabbard was notably vague. She said: "I'm leaving it up to the lawyers and the Department of Justice to take a look at this and to determine the specific legal parameters."
Atkinson, who spent 15 years at the Justice Department before serving as intelligence community inspector general from 2018 to 2020, was fired by Trump in April 2020. At the time, Atkinson said his dismissal was difficult to view as anything other than a consequence of having "faithfully discharged" his legal obligations as an independent inspector general.
A former DOJ official said the suggestion that Atkinson had engaged in criminal wrongdoing was "preposterous," describing him as "an exceedingly careful and thoughtful attorney and public servant."
The move has drawn sharp criticism from the senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee. Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut said in a statement: "The whistleblower who made Congress aware of Trump's efforts to extort Ukraine and falsely smear his opponent followed all the rules and demonstrated courage and principle."
He warned that while the referral would "amount to nothing because no misconduct occurred," it would nonetheless "chill future whistleblowers from coming forward to Congress with confidence that the law will protect them. I suspect that is precisely the point."
Menawhile, the documents released by Gabbard's own office reportedly include positive descriptions of the whistleblower, with one colleague characterised as calling them a "star performer" who was credible and trustworthy.
The criminal referrals are the latest in a series of actions by the Trump administration to revisit the political battles of his first term. Gabbard has also used her tenure to push back on the 2017 intelligence assessment that concluded Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Trump. CIA director John Ratcliffe separately made a criminal referral targeting former CIA director John Brennan.
Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives in December 2019 for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. He was acquitted by the Senate in February 2020.
Earlier this week, the president renewed his claim on Truth Social that the impeachment was a "hoax" and endorsed arguments by his former lawyer Alan Dershowitz that it should be formally reversed.
Keep ReadingShow less










