BRITISH home secretary Priti Patel has slammed the critics of her government’s controversial immigration deal with Rwanda and the BBC’s “xenophobic” overtones in reporting the matter.
She was "taken aback" by the tone of BBC journalists' references to Rwanda after the agreement with the African country was announced, she told The Telegraph.
She said the corporation’s “undercurrent” was similar to the views expressed by opposition parties.
"When you hear the critics start to stereotype, start to generalise, first of all that's all very offensive. It's deeply offensive, and it's based on ignorance and prejudice, some of this, in my view. I could call them lazy and sloppy characterisations, but actually they're not. I heard plenty of that not long after the announcement was made”.
"There are always going to be critics, and we live in a free country," she said in an interview with the newspaper published on Saturday (23).
According to documents published by the government last week, Patel overruled reservations from officials about her plan to send thousands of asylum seekers to Rwanda.
The plan, unveiled by prime minister Boris Johnson, seeks to act as a deterrent to migrants who make illegal boat crossings to Britain from France.
It has drawn heavy criticism from political opponents and campaigners.
In an exchange of letters with Patel, the top official in the Home Office highlighted uncertainty over the scheme's value to the taxpayer.
The government has said it would contribute an initial £120 million to the scheme.
"I do not believe sufficient evidence can be obtained to demonstrate that the policy will have a deterrent effect significant enough to make the policy value for money," Home Office permanent secretary Matthew Rycroft said.
Patel acknowledged the concerns but stated her belief that without taking action to stop the crossings, both the monetary costs and the loss of life among those who attempt to navigate the busy shipping channel would rise.
"It would therefore be imprudent in my view, as home secretary, to allow the absence of quantifiable and dynamic modelling ... to delay delivery of a policy that we believe will reduce illegal migration, save lives, and ultimately break the business model of the smuggling gangs," she wrote.
Last year, more than 28,000 migrants and refugees made the crossing from mainland Europe to Britain, a fraction of the number arriving in other European countries, but enough to keep immigration a politically sensitive topic among some voters.
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

Balendra Shah said he had recently learnt that Nepal had also 'encroached' on territories in India.
Getty Images
Nepal prime minister's remarks on ‘encroaching’ Indian land spark controversy
Jun 01, 2026
NEPAL prime minister Balendra Shah on Sunday said he had recently learnt that Nepal had also “encroached” on territories in India, while responding to questions in Parliament on the long-running border dispute between the two countries.
In his first appearance in the ongoing Parliament session that began on May 11, Shah said India and Nepal had agreed to seek the help of historians, surveyors and experts to resolve the issue. He also said Kathmandu had raised the matter with China and the United Kingdom.
Hours later, Nepal’s Foreign Ministry clarified that Shah’s comments referred to “no-man’s land encroachments” and “cross-border occupation” between the two countries, and not territorial claims.
Nepal and India have an old border dispute over Lipulekh, Limpiyadhura and Kalapani, with both countries claiming the areas. India maintains that the territories are part of Uttarakhand and has said the issue should be resolved through bilateral dialogue.
There was no immediate response from India to Shah’s remarks. Earlier this month, India rejected Nepal’s objection to the upcoming Kailash Mansarovar Yatra through Lipulekh Pass and described Kathmandu’s territorial claims as an “unilateral artificial enlargement” that New Delhi considers “untenable”.
Speaking in Parliament, Shah said: “The Nepal government has officially sent a diplomatic note to India, mentioning the issue of encroachment of territories by India, including Lipulekh, and we have already received their response.”
“Both the countries have agreed to resolve the issue sitting together with the help of historians, surveyors and concerned experts through diplomatic means,” he said.
Replying to a question from a lawmaker on the Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani dispute, Shah said Nepal too had “encroached” on Indian territory in some places.
“You will be surprised to know about a fact, which I have learnt recently, only after becoming the Prime Minister. It is not only India that has encroached Nepalese territories, but Nepal has also encroached India's territories in many places,” Shah said.
“Now both countries should study the facts and sit together as friends and resolve the issue.”
The three disputed areas are located near the trijunction of India, Tibet and Nepal.
Shah also said Nepal had discussed the issue with China and the United Kingdom. He said the matter was raised with the UK because it dates back to the period when the British government left the region.
His remarks triggered criticism from opposition leaders and former diplomats in Nepal.
Opposition lawmakers Basana Thapa of the Nepali Congress and Ramesh Malla of the Nepali Communist Party objected to the remarks and demanded that they be removed from the parliamentary record.
They said Shah should either provide evidence to support his claim or withdraw the statement.
Former Nepal foreign minister Pradip Gyawali also reportedly sought an apology from Shah.
Former Nepalese ambassador to India Nilambara Acharya told Kantipuronline that Shah had “no information regarding Indian territories being encroached by Nepal”.
Acharya said 97 per cent of the border disputes between the two countries had already been resolved. He added that there were reports of Nepalese using land in India and Indians using land in Nepal because of missing border pillars in some areas, but said Nepal had not officially encroached on Indian territory.
Another former Nepal ambassador to India, Deep Kumar Upadhyay, said there was no official record of Nepal occupying Indian land.
“India has also not raised this issue on record… So far we have conducted studies, but this issue has never surfaced… I don't know in which context the prime minister spoke about such a serious matter,” he told Nepalpress.
Nepal-India border expert Buddhi Narayan Shrestha also rejected Shah’s remarks.
“Nepal has never encroached Indian territories or extended its occupation in the border area. In some border areas, due to cross-holding occupations, farmers of both the countries have used each other's land,” he said.
Following the controversy, Nepal’s Foreign Ministry issued a clarification saying Shah’s remarks referred to “Dasgaja”, or no-man’s land encroachments and cross-border occupation.
The ministry said Nepal’s present border with India is based on the Sugauli Treaty of 1816.
“Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani and Susta in Nepal-India border area are territories that remain to be demarcated,” the Foreign Ministry said.
The Treaty of Sugauli was signed in 1816 between Nepal and the British East India Company and laid the basis for much of the current India-Nepal border after a war between the two sides.
“There are problems relating to cross-border occupation and no-man's land (Dasgaja) encroachments in some other areas besides these. What the prime minister mentioned in Parliament was related mainly to Dasgaja encroachment and cross-border occupation,” the ministry spokesperson said.
The spokesperson also said there were possibilities that “land being used by people on the Indian side may lie in Nepalese territory” and vice versa.
“What the PM said about Indian land lying in Nepali side is related to cross-border occupation,” the statement added.
The controversy comes ahead of a five-day India visit by a delegation of Nepal’s ruling Rastriya Swatantra Party led by its chairman Rabi Lamichhane.
Lamichhane is visiting India at the invitation of BJP president Nitin Nabin and is expected to hold political and diplomatic meetings in New Delhi, according to the party.
Keep ReadingShow less






