RHS-Eastern Eye Garden of Unity unveiled at Chelsea Flower Show
At the event, landscape designer Manoj Malde had married his partner, Clive Gillmor, in what has been hailed as a first gay marriage for Chelsea
By Amit RoyMay 23, 2023
Landscape designer Manoj Malde has spoken of the highlights of the RHS-Eastern Eye Garden of Unity which was unveiled on Monday (22) at the Chelsea Flower Show.
“It’s a very colourful garden – pinks, oranges with hints of aubergine and alabaster,” said Malde.
Even amidst the riot of colour, his creation stood out – and attracted a great deal of favourable attention from gardening critics and members of the public.
He spoke on a day when King Charles and Queen Camilla visited the Chelsea Flower and kept up the tradition that was long maintained by Queen Elizabeth, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society. And the Princess of Wales attended a picnic for 100 schoolchildren.
The RHS has minted a new Elizabeth Medal of Honour “with the gracious assent of His Majesty King Charles III in perpetual remembrance of Her Majesty’s glorious reign”.
At the RHS president’s lunch for 400 guests, Keith Weed stressed: “I’d like to just start by saying this is the 101st RHS Chelsea Flower Show.”
He added it was the first to be led by its director general Clare Matterson, whose new strategy includes making the RHS, which has over 600,000 members, a more diverse organisation.
Guests saw a video in which Matterson said: “Saving the world starts at our fingertips…and plants are at the heart of any garden. We nurture them wherever they are. At the RHS, we believe that if you have plants, you’re a gardener.
And the world is facing multiple crises from the climate emergency to biodiversity loss to huge economic and social upheavals. And we know that gardening can be integral to helping to address these. And this is why today we’re launching our new strategy to be there for everyone on their lifelong adventure with gardening.”
Matterson, who has worked in close partnership with Eastern Eye to bring about the Garden of Unity, added at the end of her video: “We know that everyone’s journey with gardening is different. And we want to be there for everyone at every stage on their lifelong journey with gardening.
Few activities bring so many benefits to so many people. So that’s why we believe that from beginners to experienced horticulturalists, from houseplants, local gardens to big national gardens, we believe that everybody should have the right to have access to gardening. And that gardening should be embraced as a way of life for everybody. And that’s why saving the world really does start at our fingertips.”
The keynote address was delivered by the US ambassador to the UK, Jane Hartley, whose residence, Winfield House, in Regent’s Park, is said to have the biggest garden in London after Buckingham Palace.
After a year in the post, she said she had seen English seasons change. “I love all the seasons, but spring is particularly special. And it’s more special here than any place in the world. Flowers tumble out of window boxes and crawl up brick walls. (As) you walk down the street, you’ll see an older woman plant foxgloves.”
Malde said many celebrity guests had been drawn to the Garden of Unity, among them the actress Dame Judi Dench and also Thérèse Coffey, secretary of state for environment, food and rural affairs, who is expecting to accompany Rishi Sunak to the G20 summit in India in September this year.
“We had a conversation about how we can make gardening and horticulture more inclusive and encourage different communities to take part, not just in RHS shows and gardens, but actually gardening as a whole and how they can enjoy it, learn different techniques of gardening, how to grow things, and genuinely become part of the wonderful industry of horticulture in this country,” said Malde.
Suryakala, alongside her son designer Manoj Malde
His very happy and proud mother, Suryakala, was alongside her son, who was dressed in his wedding finery because on Monday morning in the Garden of Unity he had married his partner, Clive Gillmor, in what has been hailed as a first for Chelsea.
In fact, King Charles and Queen Camilla dropped by the Garden of Unity to meet the newly married couple.
“They were lovely,” said Malde.
The meeting was apparently at Charles’s request.
On Tuesday evening, guests were invited to the formal opening of the RHS-Eastern Eye Garden of Unity.
Drawing attention to some of the highlights in the garden, Malde said: “We’ve got some artichokes here, we’re growing sweet corn, we’ve got chillies in the garden. We’ve also got aubergines – nothing like a lovely aubergine curry. We’ve got kohlrabi, lettuce and chard. We’ve even got marigolds – marigolds are really important in Hindu worship and festivals.
“And peas! I love growing peas and there’s nothing like a fresh pea curry. I’ve actually got some of those growing in the recycled oil drums. We’ve got these lovely embroidered throw cushions that represent artisan skills from India. We’ve got these lovely garlands hanging from the pergola.”
Malde said most Eastern Eye readers “will be familiar with hanging limes and chillies at your front door to keep the evil eye away and we’ve done that also on the pergola.”
He said his famous florist friend, Simon Lycett, “has curated the most amazing table. We’ve got beautiful, copper kalashes. We’ve got coriander, we’ve got okra – bhindi to most of you. We’ve got small bananas and pineapple. We’ve got fruit and vegetables from around the world. We’ve also got saffron mangoes – they are my favourite.
“We’ve got calendula – you can use them in your cooking. And then we’ve got things like Birds of Paradise, and Red Hot Pokers. We’ve even got flowers from a radish, and Eryngium as well. Alliums are here, and bits of fennel – a superb array of a mix of them.
“And one thing that I must point out is we’ve got the little deities of Ganesh, Saraswati, Lakshmi, we’ve even got the Shiva Lingam. There’s also coconut on a copper kalash. And we’ve got this most beautiful granite statue sitting on a stone – and it is Ganesh. Now, as we all know, in Hindu worship – especially weddings – a wedding doesn’t take place without the presence of Ganesh.
“We’ve even got a Rajasthani door, which I’ve managed to borrow from one of my suppliers. So it’s so lovely to be able to have different parts and different flavours of my heritage in the garden.”
He has plant five trees in the garden – “it’s one species, but we have five of them. The reason why I’ve incorporated these trees into the garden is because when I was at school (in Mombasa in Kenya), for my religious education exams, I studied Islam. These trees represent the five pillars of Islam. My trees also represent love, kindness, unity, understanding and empathy.”
AI can make thousands of podcast episodes every week with very few people.
Making an AI podcast episode costs almost nothing and can make money fast.
Small podcasters cannot get noticed. It is hard for them to earn.
Advertisements go to AI shows. Human shows get ignored.
Listeners do not mind AI. Some like it.
A company can now publish thousands of podcasts a week with almost no people. That fact alone should wake up anyone who makes money from talking into a mic.
The company now turns out roughly 3,000 episodes a week with a team of eight. Each episode costs about £0.75 (₹88.64) to make. With as few as 20 listens, an episode can cover its cost. That single line explains why the rest of this story is happening.
When AI takes over podcasts human creators are struggling to keep up iStock
The math that changes the game
Podcasting used to be slow and hands-on. Hosts booked guests, edited interviews, and hunted sponsors. Now, the fixed costs, including writing, voice, and editing, can be automated. Once that system is running, adding another episode barely costs anything; it is just another file pushed through the same machine.
To see how that changes the landscape, look at the scale we are talking about. By September 2025, there were already well over 4.52 million podcasts worldwide. In just three months, close to half a million new shows joined the pile. It has become a crowded marketplace worth roughly £32 billion (₹3.74 trillion), most of it fuelled by advertising money.
That combination of a huge market plus near-zero marginal costs creates a simple incentive: flood the directories with niche shows. Even tiny audiences become profitable.
What mass production looks like
These AI shows are not replacements for every human program. They are different products. Producers use generative models to write scripts, synthesise voice tracks, add music, and publish automatically. Topics are hyper-niche: pollen counts in a mid-sized city, daily stock micro-summaries, or a five-minute briefing on a single plant species. The episodes are short, frequent, and tailored to narrow advertiser categories.
That model works because advertisers can target tiny audiences. If an antihistamine maker can reach fifty people looking up pollen data in one town, that can still be worth paying for. Multiply that by thousands of micro-topics, and the revenue math stacks up.
How mass-produced AI podcasts are drowning out real human voicesiStock
Where human creators lose
Podcasting has always been fragile for independent creators. Most shows never break even. Discoverability is hard. Promotion costs money. Now, add AI fleets pushing volume, and the problem worsens.
Platforms surface content through algorithms. If those algorithms reward frequency, freshness, or sheer inventory, AI producers gain an advantage. Human shows that take weeks to produce with high-quality narrative, interviews, or even investigative pieces get buried.
Advertisers chasing cheap reach will be tempted by mass AI networks. That will push down the effective CPMs (cost per thousand listens) for many categories. Small hosts who relied on a few branded reads or listener donations will see the pool shrink.
What listeners get and what they lose
Not every listener cares if a host is synthetic. Some care only about the utility: a quick sports update, a commute briefing, or a how-to snippet. For those use cases, AI can be fine, or even better, because it is faster, cheaper, and always on.
But the thing is, a lot of podcast value comes from human quirks. The long-form interview, the offbeat joke, the voice that makes you feel known—those are hard to fake. Studies and industry voices already show 52% of consumers feel less engaged with content. The result is a split audience: one side tolerates or prefers automated, functional audio; the other side pays to keep human voices alive.
When cheap AI shows flood the market small creators lose their edgeiStock
Legal and ethical damage control
Mass AI podcasting raises immediate legal and ethical questions.
Copyright — Models trained on protected audio and text can reproduce or riff on copyrighted works.
Impersonation — Synthetic voices can mirror public figures, which risks deception.
Misinformation — Automated scripts without fact-checking can spread errors at scale.
Transparency — Few platforms force disclosure that an episode is AI-generated.
If regulators force tighter rules, the tiny profit margin on each episode could disappear. That would make the mass-production model unprofitable overnight. Alternatively, platforms could impose labelling and remove low-quality feeds. Either outcome would reshape the calculus.
How the industry can respond through practical moves
The ecosystem will not collapse overnight.
Label AI episodes clearly.
Use discovery algorithms that reward engagement, not volume.
Create paywalls, memberships, or time-listened metrics.
Use AI tools to help humans, not replace them.
Industry standards on IP and voice consent are needed to reduce legal exposure. Platforms and advertisers hold most of the cards here. They can choose to favour volume or to protect quality. Their choice will decide many creators’ fates.
Three short scenarios, then the point
Flooded and cheap — Platforms favour volume. Ads chase cheap reach. Many independent shows vanish, and audio becomes a sea of similar, useful, but forgettable feeds.
Regulated and curated — Disclosure rules and smarter discovery reward listener engagement. Human shows survive, and AI fills utility roles.
Hybrid balance — Creators use AI tools to speed up workflows while keeping control over voice and facts. New business models emerge that pay for depth.
All three are plausible. The industry will move towards the one that matches where platforms and advertisers put their money.
Can human podcasters survive the flood of robot-made showsiStock
New rules, old craft
Machines can mass-produce audio faster and cheaper than people. That does not make them better storytellers. It makes them efficient at delivering information. If you are a creator, your defence is simple: make content machines cannot copy easily. Tell stories that require curiosity, risk, restraint, and relationships. Build listeners who will pay for that difference.
If you are a platform or advertiser, your choice is also simple: do you reward noise or signal? Reward signal, and you keep what made podcasting special. Reward noise, and you get scale and a thinner, cheaper industry in return. Either way, the next few years will decide whether podcasting stays a human medium with tools or becomes a tool-driven medium with a few human highlights. The soundscape is changing. If human creators want to survive, they need to focus on the one thing machines do not buy: trust.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.