Skip to content 
Search

Latest Stories

Saudi money talks

by Amit Roy

THE utterly disgusting murder of the Saudi Arabian journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, inside his country’s consulate on October 2 has put the kingdom’s closest western allies, especially the UK, in an impossible situation.


After initially lying that he walked out of the consulate unharmed and then suggesting he died in a “fist fight”, Saudi foreign minister Adel al-Jubeir has admitted to Fox News that the journalist’s death was indeed murder.

The minister said Khashoggi’s death was a “huge and grave mistake”, and added that the 18 people implicated in the killing would be punished appropriately.

“This was an operation that was a rogue operation,” he added. “This was an operation where individuals ended up exceeding the authorities and responsibilities they had. They made the mistake when they killed Jamal Khashoggi in the consulate and they tried to cover up for it.”

He denied the killing had been ordered by the Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman. “There were not people closely tied to him.”

However, former MI6 chief Sir John Sawers said “all the evidence” indicates Khashoggi, a US resident and Washington Post columnist who was critical of the current Saudi regime in general and Mohammed bin Salman in particular, was murdered on the orders of someone close to the crown prince.

It will be recalled Britain rolled out the red carpet for the crown prince in March, so what should be the country’s response now?

Oliver Sprague, Amnesty International UK’s arms expert, believes the UK should have halted arms sales to Saudi Arabia long ago over its military intervention in Yemen.

Liberal Democrats leader Sir Vince Cable commented: “The UK’s heavy reliance on Saudi Arabia for arms sales is embarrassingly compromising in these circumstances.

“The government should have already suspended arms export licences to Saudi Arabia given the outrages in Yemen. This reinforces the argument for loosening the bonds to the regime.”

But the UK reaction probably will be similar to that of the US, where president Donald Trump argued that halting arms deals would “hurt us more than it would hurt them”.

The UK has used standard arms licences to approve more than $6.4 billion (£4.9bn) in arms, including advanced jets and munitions, to Saudi Arabia since the start of the war in Yemen in 2015.

Labour would suspend arms sales to Saudi Arabia, Barry Gardiner, shadow international trade secretary, has stated. “We must look very carefully again at the relationship we have with Saudi Arabia.”

He acknowledged there were a “lot of jobs” in the UK linked to the trade, but said “this is about who we are as a country”.

“We have a thriving defence industry and, of course, this would be a hit to that industry,” Gardiner, the Brent North MP, admitted.

Labour’s shadow foreign secretary, Emily Thornberry, tweeted: “The Saudi lies and impunity must stop here.”

It is unlikely, however, that a Labour government would act any differently to the ruling Conservatives.

In a joint statement, the UK foreign secretary, Jeremy Hunt, his French counterpart Jean-Yves Le Drian and Germany’s Heiko Maas said: “Nothing can justify this killing and we condemn it in the strongest possible terms. Defending freedom of expression and a free press are key priorities for Germany, the United Kingdom and France. The threatening, attacking or killing of journalists, under any circumstances, is unacceptable and of utmost

concern to our three nations.”

Now that he is no longer foreign secretary, Conservative MP Boris Johnson has used his newspaper column to condemn the Saudis and compared the killing of Khashoggi

with the attempted assassination, allegedly by the Russians, of Sergei and Yulia Skripal.

“In the Salisbury atrocity and the Khashoggi murder we therefore seem to have events of a type: statesponsored plots to execute opponents on foreign soil, where the very outlandishness of the modus operandi is intended to send a terrifying public warning to every expatriate journalist or dissident who dares to oppose the regime.

“This cannot become a pattern. We cannot just let it pass.

“Yes, of course our relations with Russia and with Saudi Arabia are very different. We have crucial commercial and security partnerships with Saudi Arabia…”

This is crucially the point. As the Brexit secretary Dominic Raab pointed out: “We are not throwing our hands in the air and terminating the relationship with Saudi Arabia, not just because of the huge number of British jobs that depend on it, but also because if you exert

influence over your partners you need to be able to talk to them.”

The problem is that in dealing with the Russians over the Skripals and the Saudis over Khashoggi, Britain cannot be seen to be adopting different moral standards.

Within Saudi Arabia, Khashoggi’s murder might trigger changes. The author Robert Lacey, a Saudi expert, has speculated that Mohammed bin Salman might have to be replaced

as crown prince. The irony is that he has many enemies because he was seen as a “reformer”.

More For You

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn

Getty Images

The real challenge isn’t having more parties, but governing a divided nation

It is a truth universally acknowledged that voters are dissatisfied with the political choices on offer - so must they be in want of new parties too? A proliferation of start-ups showed how tricky political match-making can be. Zarah Sultana took Jeremy Corbyn by surprise by announcing they will co-lead a new left party. Two of Nigel Farage’s exes announced separate political initiatives to challenge Reform from its right, with the leader of London’s Conservatives lending her voice to Rupert Lowe’s revival of the politics of repatriation.

Corbyn and Sultana are from different generations. He had been an MP for a decade by the time she was born. For Sultana’s allies, this intergenerational element is a core case for the joint leadership. But the communications clash suggests friction ahead. After his allies could not persuade Sultana to retract her announcement, Corbyn welcomed her decision to leave Labour, saying ‘negotiations continue’ over the structure and leadership of a new party. It will seek to link MPs elected as pro-Gaza independents with other strands of the left outside Labour.

Keep ReadingShow less
Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

Amol Rajan at Prayagraj

Amol Rajan confronts loss along the Ganges

ONE reason I watched the BBC documentary Amol Rajan Goes to the Ganges with particular interest was because I have been wondering what to do with the ashes of my uncle, who died in August last year. His funeral, like that of his wife, was half Christian and half Hindu, as he had wished. But he left no instructions about his ashes.

Sooner or later, this is a question that every Hindu family in the UK will have to face, since it has been more than half a century since the first generation of Indian immigrants began arriving in this country. Amol admits he found it difficult to cope with the loss of his father, who died aged 76 three years ago. His ashes were scattered in the Thames.

Keep ReadingShow less
One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

  Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less