Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Should schools respond to the current conflict between Hamas and Israel?

Should schools respond to the current conflict between Hamas and Israel?

ONLY a few years ago schools were proud of their every child matters policy. It was all the rage. But then, all of a sudden, without rhyme or reason, it vanished into thin air.

For some educationalists, the recent Hamas/Israel conflict is a clear-cut singularity of rhyme. It’s the reason why, in their view, many feel the former home secretary had to go. It was – and is – a simple black and white matter defined by their understanding of ontology and absolute morality. As such, there’s evidence that a few schools in places like Tower Hamlets, Glasgow, Bristol and Burton-on-Trent have given tacit approval to pupils to strike or protest for Palestine. The walk outs have even encouraged parents and teachers to join in.


Although I am not against activism per se, I do have concerns about head teachers adopting a strident political stance and thereby polarising their school community. Apart from the fact children are far too young to understand the complexities of international politics, allowing them to protest does very little to foster cohesion and harmony amongst the pupil population. Some might even argue it’s a form of child abuse or indoctrination.

I’m currently doing work in a densely multicultural, multi religious suburb of Birmingham. Until the 7th October, the atmosphere in the area had been fairly amicable where people understood and respected difference and equality.

Since then however, there’s been rumblings not only in mosques and local community cafes, but also amongst the school population where every now and then pupils let slip anti-Semitic language.

Capture5 1 Buidlings in Gaza have been targeted in Israeli air strikes, with the death toll on both sides rising as the conflict escalates

In schools where majority of pupils are from Islamic communities, it’s not uncommon for pupils to openly verbalise their anger against the reaction of Israel to the Hamas terror attack. Even a friend of mine – president of a mosque – has been virulently vitriolic in his condemnation of Israel, refusing to accept or acknowledge an opposing view without going into the realms of some unsubstantiated conspiracy theories.

Confronted with such an atmosphere, many apolitical teachers feel uncomfortable or ill-equipped in challenging anti-Jewish rhetoric that vilifies and demonises the Hebrew community. Many feel they’re sailing in disturbing, unchartered seas.

Should teachers address the geo-political situation – especially when its underlying concepts are at the heart of two historically warring factions? And if there’s no way of managing a discourse or dialogue on this subject, shouldn’t schools adopt the laissez affair policy of remaining detached and leaving well alone?

In the past I have argued that pupils should be given awareness of politics and the machinery of governance especially when it comes to subjects like those raised by David Attenborough or Greta Thunberg.

But addressing the current political conflict is not the same as climate change activism. A debate on climate change does not actively marginalise people’s belief systems nor does it alienate people on the basis of their race or creed. Hearing protestors spout anti-Semitic rhetoric over the megaphones – as many have witnessed – cannot possibly be conducive to our continuing life-long effort to promote British values of mutual respect and tolerance.

After all, it’s one thing giving pupils tools to understand how democracy works and the Western secular principles upon which we’re governed, it’s another ostracising a religious minority and permitting pupils to broadcast racist slogans, threats, and rallying war cries against them. One wonders how Jewish pupils in our neighbourhoods must feel in today’s very volatile, intimidating atmosphere of cultural antagonism, religious suspicion, and political hostility.

Roshan Doug scaled e1701159235475 Dr Roshan Doug

Educational management must rise above sectarian divide and understand the need to ensure that all pupils irrespective of their cultural or religious background feel safe not only in their vicinity, but travelling to and from school. And if that means abstaining from communal and international political matters that are devisive and likely to make a sizeable group of people in this country feel intimidated, threatened or fearful for their own safety, then so be it. There should be no rhyme or reason to propose frictions, divisions and hatred against any group or individual. Surely that’s a proper way to adhere to our values and ensure that every child really does matter.

(Dr Roshan Doug is the CEO of Perspective Education, UK. He has been working with schools and colleges for over 30 years as an education management consultant.)

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less