Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Sikh tragedy in latest US shooting ‘embarrassment’

By Amit Roy

ANOTHER day, another mass shooting in America.


Last Thursday (15), Brandon Scott Hole, 19, who used to work at the FedEx warehouse in Indi­anapolis in the state of Indiana, shot and killed eight people in­side and injured 60 before turn­ing the gun on himself.

Four of the fatalities were Sikh – Amarjeet Johal, 66; Jaswinder Kaur, 64; Jaswinder Singh, 68; and Amarjit Sekhon, 48.

The New York Times pointed out: “Some family members of victims who were Sikh provided different spellings and ages: Jas­vinder Kaur, 50; Amarjit Sekhon, 49; and Jaswinder Singh, 70.”

That is so Indian. Our elders are so vague about exact ages, spellings and birthdays.

Ever since the 9/11 attacks in the US, Sikhs have feared that with their turbans and beards, they were being confused as supporters of Osama bin Laden.

US president Joe Biden wants to bring in gun control, but his efforts are being frustrated by Senate Republicans.

“This has to end,” he said. “It is a national embarrassment. Who in God’s name needs a weapon that can hold a hundred rounds? Or 40 rounds? Or 20 rounds? It’s just wrong. And I’m not going to give up until it’s done.”

But will it ever be done? That Americans should be free to carry firearms is a concept diffi­cult for the rest of the world to understand. Nothing much will change until Americans them­selves learn not to live with the pandemic of mass killings.

Oscar Wilde set it out in The Picture of Dorian Gray: “They say when good Americans die they go to Paris,” chuckled Sir Thomas...

“Really! And where do bad Americans go to when they die?” inquired the Duchess.

“They go to America,” mur­mured Lord Henry.

More For You

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar speaks to media infront of the party’s Ad Van Campaign on May 04, 2026 in Bathgate, Scotland

Getty Images

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Sunder Katwala

The tremors of the May 2026 elections could shift the tectonic plates of British politics. Attention will quickly turn to the Westminster aftershocks, including what the fallout of these national elections in Scotland and Wales alongside local elections across much of England, mean for Sir Keir Starmer’s future. Yet these seismic electoral upheavals merit scrutiny in their own right.

Wales is set for a once a century political earthquake. Labour has not just led the Welsh government since devolution began in 1999 - but won the most votes in every national election in Wales since 1922. Yet it now trails third, burdened by double incumbency in Cardiff Bay and Westminster, with the party watching the Welsh nationalists of Plaid Cymru and Reform’s pro-Brexit populists compete to top the polls. That contrast has polarised Wales - by age and geography - though a broad majority would prefer a government led by Plaid Cymru’s Rhun Ap Iowerth, with two-thirds hoping to keep Reform out.

Scotland could offer a rare pocket of political stability. John Swinney is the third Scottish first minister of a turbulent term after Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf, but may now secure a fifth term for his Scottish National Party. The trick to bucking the anti-incumbent trend has been to leverage his Edinburgh government being comparatively less unpopular than its London counterpart. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar sought to demonstrate his own distance from Westminster by calling for Starmer to resign, but his bid to lead Scotland, and become its second Asian First Minister, looks set to fall short.

Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap IorwerthGetty Images

Keep ReadingShow less